Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2158728032> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2158728032 endingPage "1187" @default.
- W2158728032 startingPage "1187" @default.
- W2158728032 abstract "<h3>Importance</h3> At many institutions, computed tomography with iodinated intravenous contrast medium is the preferred imaging modality for staging of the neck in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. However, few studies have specifically assessed the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography for determining the presence or absence of extracapsular spread (ECS). <h3>Objective</h3> To determine the accuracy of modern, contrast-enhanced, multidetector computed tomography in the diagnosis of ECS of cervical lymph node metastases from squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. <h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3> Retrospective observational study at an academic tertiary referral center among 100 consecutive patients between May 1, 2007, and February 1, 2012, who underwent a lateral cervical neck dissection for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck with neck metastases of at least 1 cm in diameter on pathologic assessment. Exclusion criteria included malignant neoplasms other than squamous cell carcinoma, a delay in surgery longer than 6 weeks from the time of staging computed tomography, and prior treatment of the neck or recurrent disease or a second primary. <h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3> Each patient was independently assigned a subjective score for the presence of ECS by 2 Certificate of Added Qualification–certified neuroradiologists according to a 5-point scale. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated, and sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for each observer. <h3>Results</h3> The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for observers 1 and 2 are 0.678 (95% CI, 0.578-0.768) and 0.621 (95% CI, 0.518-0.716), respectively. For observer 1, the positive and negative predictive values for the detection of ECS were 84% (95% CI, 68%-93%) and 49% (95% CI, 36%-62%), respectively. For observer 2, the positive and negative predictive values for the detection of ECS were 71% (95% CI, 57%-82%) and 48% (95% CI, 32%-64%), respectively. <h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3> Computed tomography cannot be used to reliably determine the presence of pathologic ECS. Radiologic findings suggestive of ECS should not be relied on for treatment planning in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck." @default.
- W2158728032 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2158728032 creator A5002839107 @default.
- W2158728032 creator A5008896995 @default.
- W2158728032 creator A5009079779 @default.
- W2158728032 creator A5051070911 @default.
- W2158728032 creator A5065416501 @default.
- W2158728032 creator A5086074491 @default.
- W2158728032 creator A5086088557 @default.
- W2158728032 date "2013-11-01" @default.
- W2158728032 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2158728032 title "Accuracy of Computed Tomography in the Prediction of Extracapsular Spread of Lymph Node Metastases in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck" @default.
- W2158728032 cites W1492225083 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W1591118513 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W1967854008 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W196896152 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W1969463716 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W1969528363 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W1974136861 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W1983065223 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2001144635 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2016138558 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2030435142 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2032046435 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2034784240 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2036749444 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2037379477 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2046355768 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2048389271 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2048787136 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2053613247 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2055472916 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2057652674 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2064692482 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2067802336 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2068143759 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2069224380 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2089051701 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2089941799 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2090990325 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2106402375 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2120068217 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2122070012 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2126039159 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2133463688 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2142222095 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2145078756 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2152980002 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2158534818 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2169732017 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2183386853 @default.
- W2158728032 cites W2214206681 @default.
- W2158728032 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2013.4491" @default.
- W2158728032 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24076619" @default.
- W2158728032 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2158728032 type Work @default.
- W2158728032 sameAs 2158728032 @default.
- W2158728032 citedByCount "72" @default.
- W2158728032 countsByYear W21587280322014 @default.
- W2158728032 countsByYear W21587280322015 @default.
- W2158728032 countsByYear W21587280322016 @default.
- W2158728032 countsByYear W21587280322017 @default.
- W2158728032 countsByYear W21587280322018 @default.
- W2158728032 countsByYear W21587280322019 @default.
- W2158728032 countsByYear W21587280322020 @default.
- W2158728032 countsByYear W21587280322021 @default.
- W2158728032 countsByYear W21587280322022 @default.
- W2158728032 countsByYear W21587280322023 @default.
- W2158728032 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2158728032 hasAuthorship W2158728032A5002839107 @default.
- W2158728032 hasAuthorship W2158728032A5008896995 @default.
- W2158728032 hasAuthorship W2158728032A5009079779 @default.
- W2158728032 hasAuthorship W2158728032A5051070911 @default.
- W2158728032 hasAuthorship W2158728032A5065416501 @default.
- W2158728032 hasAuthorship W2158728032A5086074491 @default.
- W2158728032 hasAuthorship W2158728032A5086088557 @default.
- W2158728032 hasBestOaLocation W21587280321 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConcept C2776530083 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConcept C2776833033 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConcept C2777546739 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConcept C2778474501 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConcept C2780849966 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConcept C58471807 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConceptScore W2158728032C126322002 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConceptScore W2158728032C126838900 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConceptScore W2158728032C146357865 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConceptScore W2158728032C151730666 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConceptScore W2158728032C167135981 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConceptScore W2158728032C2776530083 @default.
- W2158728032 hasConceptScore W2158728032C2776833033 @default.