Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2158837370> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2158837370 endingPage "346" @default.
- W2158837370 startingPage "329" @default.
- W2158837370 abstract "1. Secondary production was estimated for Plecoptera, Odonata and Megaloptera (mostly large predators) occurring on the snag habitat of a subtropical blackwater river in the southeastern U.S.A. Coastal Plain for 2 years. Production estimates and gut analyses were used in estimating species-specific ingestion to construct a quantitative food web of the predator portion of the invertebrate assemblage. Neither basal resources (e.g. detritus) nor predaceous vertebrates (e.g. fishes) were considered in this analysis. A discharge-specific model of snag-habitat availability was used to convert values per m2 of snag surface to values per m2 of river bed. 2. These three orders included the major large predators on the snag habitat, as well as two detritivorous stoneflies. The major predators were the hellgrammite (Corydaluscornutus), five perlid stoneflies (Paragnetinakansensis, Perlestaplacida, Neoperlaclymene, Acroneuriaevoluta and Acroneuriaabnormis) and two dragonflies (Neurocorduliamolesta and Boyeriavinosa). The detritivores were Pteronarcysdorsata and Taeniopteryxlita. 3. Total predator production was high, but varied from only 7.1 to 7.4 g dry mass (DM) m−2 y−1 of snag surface (2.4–2.7 g DM m−2 y−1 of river bed) over two years. Corydalus was the largest predator and had the highest production (2.8–3.1 g DM m−2 of snag surface). The most productive stoneflies were Perlesta (0.7–1.0 g DM m−2 of snag surface) and Paragnetina (1.0–1.3 g DM m−2 of snag surface). The most productive dragonfly was Neurocordulia (0.7–1.9 g DM m−2 of snag surface). Production of the non-predaceous stoneflies was 1.0–2.3 g DM m−2 of snag surface. Production values per m2 of river bed were 2–3.5 times lower than the values per m2 snag surface. 4. Measurement of ingestion fluxes within the predator portion of the food web showed that predaceous invertebrates were primarily supported by chironomid and mayfly prey. However, the greatest consumption of chironomids and mayflies was by omnivorous hydropsychid caddisflies, which had a considerably higher production than the larger predators. There was a hierarchy of feeding with Corydalus as top predator consuming all other groups, followed in order by dragonflies, stoneflies and hydropsychids. Although the feeding hierarchy suggested the presence of four predatory trophic levels within the invertebrate assemblage, calculations of trophic position indicated there were less than two. With primary consumers (e.g. midges) having a trophic position of 2, Corydalus had a trophic position of only 3.5. 5. A relatively high fraction of invertebrate production was consumed by predaceous invertebrates, ranging from 9 to >100% for various primary consumer groups, with total consumption representing 52% of total production. Because these estimates do not include vertebrate consumption or emergence, it means that a high fraction of larval mortality is due to predation." @default.
- W2158837370 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2158837370 creator A5003119264 @default.
- W2158837370 creator A5026390452 @default.
- W2158837370 creator A5047110112 @default.
- W2158837370 creator A5083208590 @default.
- W2158837370 date "2001-03-01" @default.
- W2158837370 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2158837370 title "Food web quantification using secondary production analysis: predaceous invertebrates of the snag habitat in a subtropical river" @default.
- W2158837370 cites W1498054492 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W1965066337 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W1969087343 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W1972501876 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W1981272107 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W1987065938 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W1987852776 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W1989897679 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W1991180217 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W1998097337 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2008937226 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2013379784 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2022651580 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2025021243 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2025818964 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2033079627 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2033266700 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2034207651 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2035426173 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2042802775 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2045625270 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2047664648 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2049086000 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2050691419 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2051901574 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2059657951 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2061760894 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2066189421 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2072002579 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2077097625 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2083616467 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2091561180 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2091665103 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2097446807 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2100640576 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2105534067 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2113984584 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2120794929 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2124106845 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2142945980 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2151693232 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2151770077 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2153357555 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2155165844 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2169934922 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2177495254 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2316108733 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2320969214 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2330014261 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2332039211 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W2524366913 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W4230871231 @default.
- W2158837370 cites W571797 @default.
- W2158837370 doi "https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00680.x" @default.
- W2158837370 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
- W2158837370 type Work @default.
- W2158837370 sameAs 2158837370 @default.
- W2158837370 citedByCount "84" @default.
- W2158837370 countsByYear W21588373702012 @default.
- W2158837370 countsByYear W21588373702013 @default.
- W2158837370 countsByYear W21588373702014 @default.
- W2158837370 countsByYear W21588373702015 @default.
- W2158837370 countsByYear W21588373702016 @default.
- W2158837370 countsByYear W21588373702017 @default.
- W2158837370 countsByYear W21588373702018 @default.
- W2158837370 countsByYear W21588373702019 @default.
- W2158837370 countsByYear W21588373702020 @default.
- W2158837370 countsByYear W21588373702021 @default.
- W2158837370 countsByYear W21588373702022 @default.
- W2158837370 countsByYear W21588373702023 @default.
- W2158837370 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2158837370 hasAuthorship W2158837370A5003119264 @default.
- W2158837370 hasAuthorship W2158837370A5026390452 @default.
- W2158837370 hasAuthorship W2158837370A5047110112 @default.
- W2158837370 hasAuthorship W2158837370A5083208590 @default.
- W2158837370 hasConcept C109931610 @default.
- W2158837370 hasConcept C13474642 @default.
- W2158837370 hasConcept C173758957 @default.
- W2158837370 hasConcept C179992253 @default.
- W2158837370 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
- W2158837370 hasConcept C188382862 @default.
- W2158837370 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W2158837370 hasConcept C192158950 @default.
- W2158837370 hasConcept C2779446833 @default.
- W2158837370 hasConcept C2781015247 @default.
- W2158837370 hasConcept C63376196 @default.
- W2158837370 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2158837370 hasConcept C96857902 @default.
- W2158837370 hasConceptScore W2158837370C109931610 @default.