FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2159786095> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2159786095 endingPage "223" @default.
• W2159786095 startingPage "217" @default.
• W2159786095 abstract "Entomologia Experimentalis et ApplicataVolume 135, Issue 2 p. 217-223 Influence of arthropod sampling solutions on insect genotyping reliability Bernhard C. Stoeckle, Bernhard C. Stoeckle Unit of Molecular Zoology, Department of Animal Science, Technische Universität München, Am Hochanger 13, 85354 Freising, GermanySearch for more papers by this authorKai Dworschak, Kai Dworschak Animal Ecology, Department of Ecology & Ecosystem Management, Technische Universität München, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354 Freising, GermanySearch for more papers by this authorMartin M. Gossner, Martin M. Gossner Institute of Ecology, Friedrich-Schiller University, Dornburger Str. 159, 07743 Jena, GermanySearch for more papers by this authorRalph Kuehn, Corresponding Author Ralph Kuehn Unit of Molecular Zoology, Department of Animal Science, Technische Universität München, Am Hochanger 13, 85354 Freising, Germany *Ralph Kuehn, Unit of Molecular Zoology, Department of Animal Science, Technische Universität München, Am Hochanger 13, 85354 Freising, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Bernhard C. Stoeckle, Bernhard C. Stoeckle Unit of Molecular Zoology, Department of Animal Science, Technische Universität München, Am Hochanger 13, 85354 Freising, GermanySearch for more papers by this authorKai Dworschak, Kai Dworschak Animal Ecology, Department of Ecology & Ecosystem Management, Technische Universität München, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, 85354 Freising, GermanySearch for more papers by this authorMartin M. Gossner, Martin M. Gossner Institute of Ecology, Friedrich-Schiller University, Dornburger Str. 159, 07743 Jena, GermanySearch for more papers by this authorRalph Kuehn, Corresponding Author Ralph Kuehn Unit of Molecular Zoology, Department of Animal Science, Technische Universität München, Am Hochanger 13, 85354 Freising, Germany *Ralph Kuehn, Unit of Molecular Zoology, Department of Animal Science, Technische Universität München, Am Hochanger 13, 85354 Freising, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 06 April 2010 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2010.00977.xCitations: 16Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References Bisanti M, Ganassi S & Mandrioli M (2009) Comparative analysis of various fixative solutions on insect preservation for molecular studies. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 130: 290– 296. Broquet T & Petit E (2004) Quantifying genotyping errors in noninvasive population genetics. Molecular Ecology 13: 3601– 3608. Carvalho AOR & Vieira LGE (2000) Comparison of preservation methods of Atta spp. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) for RAPD analysis. Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 29: 489– 496. Castillo RIC & Núñez-Farfán J (2008) The evolution of sexual size dimorphism: the interplay between natural and sexual selection. Journal of Orthoptera Research 17: 197– 200. Châline N, Ratnieks FLW, Raine NE, Badcock NS & Burke T (2004) Non-lethal sampling of honey bee, Apis mellifera, DNA using wing tips. Apidologie 35: 311– 318. Dean MD & Ballard JWO (2001) Factors affecting mitochondrial DNA quality from museum preserved Drosophila simulans. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 98: 279– 283. Dillon N, Austin AD & Bartowsky E (1996) Comparison of preservation techniques for DNA extraction from hymenopterous insects. Insect Molecular Biology 5: 21– 24. Engel K & Ammer U (2003) Vergleich verschiedener Fanglösungen. Faunistisch-ökologische Mitteilungen 8: 297– 301. Fernando P, Vidya TN, Rajapakse C, Dangolla A & Melnick DJ (2003) Reliable noninvasive genotyping: fantasy or reality? Journal of Heredity 94: 115– 123. Goossens B, Waits LP & Taberlet P (1998) Plucked hair samples as a source of DNA: reliability of dinucleotide microsatellite genotyping. Molecular Ecology 7: 1237– 1241. Gossner M & Ammer U (2006) The effects of Douglas-fir on tree-specific arthropod communities in mixed species stands with European beech and Norway spruce. European Journal of Forest Research 125: 221– 235. Gurdebeke S & Maelfait JP (2002) Pitfall trapping in population genetics studies: finding the right “solution”. Journal of Arachnology 30: 255– 261. Hausknecht R, Salzer K, Filli F & Kuehn R (2009) Techniques for noninvasive genetic monitoring of Alpine Ibex (Capra ibex). Acta Theriologica 54: 277– 287. Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S & DeWaard JR (2003) Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270: 96– 99. Heydemann B (1956) Über die Bedeutung der Formalinfallen für die zoologische Landesforschung. Faunistische Mitteilungen Norddeutschlands 1: 19– 24. Hogan BLM, Costantini F & Lacy E (1986) Manipulating the Mouse Embryo. A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Woodbury, NY, USA. Hollander M & Wolfe DA (1999) Nonparametric Statistical Methods, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA. Hothorn T, Hornik K, Van De Wiel MA & Zeileis A (2009) Package ‘coin’: conditional inference procedures in a permutation test framework. Available from: http://cran.r-project.org Isono M (2005) Three approaches for cost-effective sampling of carabid beetles. Japanese Journal of Entomology 8: 1– 13. Jud P & Schmidt-Entling MH (2008) Fluid type, dilution, and bitter agent influence spider preservation in pitfall traps. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 129: 356– 359. King JR & Porter SD (2004) Recommendations on the use of alcohols for preservation of ant specimens (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insectes Sociaux 51: 197– 202. Koch DA, Duncan GA, Parsons TJ, Pruess KP & Powers TO (1998) Effects of preservation methods, parasites, and gut contents of black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) on polymerase chain reaction products. Journal of Medical Entomology 35: 314– 318. Lushai G, Fjellsted W, Marcovitch O, Aagaard K, Sherratt TN et al. (2000) Application of molecular techniques to non-lethal tissue samples of endangered butterfly populations (Parnassius apollo L.) in Norway for conservation management. Conservation Biology 94: 43– 50. Mandrioli M, Borsatti F & Mola L (2006) Factors affecting DNA preservation from museum-collected lepidopteran specimens. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 120: 239– 244. Martikainen P, Kouki J & Heikkala O (2006) The effects of green tree retention and subsequent prescribed burning on ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in boreal pine-dominated forests. Ecography 29: 659– 670. Miquel C, Bellemain E, Poillot C, Bessière J, Durand A & Taberlet P (2006) Quality indexes to assess the reliability of genotypes in studies using noninvasive sampling and multiple-tube approach. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 985– 988. Mtambo J, Van Bortel W, Madder M, Roelants P & Backeljau T (2006) Comparison of preservation methods of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus (Acari: Ixodidae) for reliable DNA amplification by PCR. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 38: 189– 199. Mühlenberg M (1993) Freilandökologie. Quelle & Meyer, Heidelberg, Germany. Müller J & Gossner M (2007) Single host trees in a closed forest canopy matrix: a highly fragmented landscape? Journal of Applied Entomology 131: 613– 620. Pompanon F, Bonin A, Bellemain E & Taberlet P (2005) Genotyping errors: causes, consequences and solutions. Nature Reviews Genetics 6: 847– 859. Post RJ, Flook PK & Millest AL (1993) Methods for the preservation of insects for DNA studies. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 21: 85– 92. Ratnasingham S & Hebert PD (2007) BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System (http://www.barcodinglife.org). Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 355– 364. Regier JC, Shultz JW, Ganley ARD, Hussey A, Shi D et al. (2008) Resolving arthropod phylogeny: exploring phylogenetic signal within 41 kb of protein-coding nuclear gene sequence. Systematic Biology 57: 920– 938. Reiss RA (2006) Ancient DNA from ice age insects: proceed with caution. Quaternary Science Reviews 25: 1877– 1893. Reiss RA, Schwert DP & Ashworth AC (1995) Field preservation of Coleoptera for molecular-genetic analyses. Environmental Entomology 24: 716– 719. Renner K (1982) Coleopterenfänge mit Bodenfallen am Sandstrand der Ostseeküste, ein Beitrag zum Problem der Lockwirkung mit Konservierungsmitteln. Faunistisch-Ökologische Mitteilungen 5: 137– 146. Rose OC, Brookes MI & Mallet JLB (1994) A quick and simple nonlethal method for extracting DNA from butterfly wings. Molecular Ecology Notes 3: 275. Sallé A, Kerdelhué C, Breton M & Lieutier F (2003) Characterization of microsatellite loci in the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytinae). Molecular Ecology Notes 3: 336– 337. Sasakawa K (2007) Effects of pitfall trap preservatives on specimen condition in carabid beetles. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 125: 321– 324. Schlötterer C (2004) The evolution of molecular markers – just a matter of fashion? Nature Reviews Genetics 5: 63– 69. Schmidt MH, Clough Y, Schulz W, Westphalen A & Tscharntke T (2006) Capture efficiency and preservation attributes of different fluids in pitfall traps. Journal of Arachnology 34: 159– 162. Sobek S, Gossner MM, Scherber C, Steffan-Dewenter I & Tscharntke T (2009) Tree diversity drives abundance and spatiotemporal diversity of true bugs (Heteroptera). Ecological Entomology 34: 772– 782. Stammer HJ (1949) Die Bedeutung der Aethylenglykolfallen für tierökologische und phänologische Untersuchungen. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft 1948: 387– 391. Taberlet P, Waits LP & Luikart G (1999) Noninvasive genetic sampling: look before you leap. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 323– 327. Tayutivutikul J, Pongprasert W, Royce LA & Ruangrit K (2003) Comparison of preservation techniques for silkworm (Bombyx mori L.) DNA based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products. Chiang Mai University Journal 2: 107– 114. Teichmann B (1994) Eine wenig bekannte Konservierungsflüßigkeit für Bodenfallen. Entomologische Nachrichten und Berichte 38: 25– 30. Vila M, Auger-Rozenberg MA, Goussard F & Lopez-Vaamonde C (2009) Effect of non-lethal sampling on life-history traits of the protected moth Graellsia isabelae (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae). Ecological Entomology 34: 356– 362. Watts PC, Thompson DJ, Allen KA & Kemp SJ (2007) How useful is DNA extracted from the legs of archived insects for microsatellite-based population genetic analyses? Journal of Insect Conservation 11: 195– 198. Citing Literature Volume135, Issue2May 2010Pages 217-223 ReferencesRelatedInformation" @default.
• W2159786095 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2159786095 creator A5045362154 @default.
• W2159786095 creator A5053342440 @default.
• W2159786095 creator A5056428455 @default.
• W2159786095 creator A5071619094 @default.
• W2159786095 date "2010-05-01" @default.
• W2159786095 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2159786095 title "Influence of arthropod sampling solutions on insect genotyping reliability" @default.
• W2159786095 cites W1492124637 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W1970835031 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W1970943990 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W1974735830 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W1981981738 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2012909086 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2017379255 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2022088394 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2028858659 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2031832906 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2037982849 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2039232683 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2041137365 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2048056059 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2057597395 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2064067799 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2066709769 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2078149435 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2081458695 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2085525886 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2087417683 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2109439286 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2122392939 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2127864831 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2128701823 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2130098503 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2140929646 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2141163753 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2150302133 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2153514543 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2156152312 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2157296800 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2171699142 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W2330738998 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W3121953277 @default.
• W2159786095 cites W4229653201 @default.
• W2159786095 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2010.00977.x" @default.
• W2159786095 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2159786095 type Work @default.
• W2159786095 sameAs 2159786095 @default.
• W2159786095 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W2159786095 countsByYear W21597860952012 @default.
• W2159786095 countsByYear W21597860952013 @default.
• W2159786095 countsByYear W21597860952015 @default.
• W2159786095 countsByYear W21597860952016 @default.
• W2159786095 countsByYear W21597860952018 @default.
• W2159786095 countsByYear W21597860952019 @default.
• W2159786095 countsByYear W21597860952020 @default.
• W2159786095 countsByYear W21597860952021 @default.
• W2159786095 countsByYear W21597860952022 @default.
• W2159786095 countsByYear W21597860952023 @default.
• W2159786095 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2159786095 hasAuthorship W2159786095A5045362154 @default.
• W2159786095 hasAuthorship W2159786095A5053342440 @default.
• W2159786095 hasAuthorship W2159786095A5056428455 @default.
• W2159786095 hasAuthorship W2159786095A5071619094 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConcept C106131492 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConcept C140779682 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConcept C177756618 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConcept C2776134702 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConcept C2777612826 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConcept C90856448 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConceptScore W2159786095C106131492 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConceptScore W2159786095C140779682 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConceptScore W2159786095C177756618 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConceptScore W2159786095C18903297 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConceptScore W2159786095C2776134702 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConceptScore W2159786095C2777612826 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConceptScore W2159786095C31972630 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConceptScore W2159786095C41008148 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConceptScore W2159786095C86803240 @default.
• W2159786095 hasConceptScore W2159786095C90856448 @default.
• W2159786095 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2159786095 hasLocation W21597860951 @default.
• W2159786095 hasOpenAccess W2159786095 @default.
• W2159786095 hasPrimaryLocation W21597860951 @default.
• W2159786095 hasRelatedWork W2035251782 @default.
• W2159786095 hasRelatedWork W2058635998 @default.
• W2159786095 hasRelatedWork W2106254208 @default.
• W2159786095 hasRelatedWork W2170488974 @default.
• W2159786095 hasRelatedWork W2294210133 @default.
• W2159786095 hasRelatedWork W2297003382 @default.
• W2159786095 hasRelatedWork W2990720088 @default.
• W2159786095 hasRelatedWork W4224314748 @default.
• W2159786095 hasRelatedWork W4297961832 @default.

• next