FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2159939252> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2159939252 endingPage "476" @default.
• W2159939252 startingPage "470" @default.
• W2159939252 abstract "In the analysis of binary response data from many types of large studies, the data are likely to have arisen from multiple centers, resulting in a within-center correlation for the response. Such correlation, or clustering, occurs when outcomes within centers tend to be more similar to each other than to outcomes in other centers. In studies where there is also variability among centers with respect to the exposure of interest, analysis of the exposure-outcome association may be confounded, even after accounting for within-center correlations. We apply several analytic methods to compare the risk of major complications associated with two strategies, staged and combined procedures, for performing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), a mechanical means of relieving blockage of blood vessels due to atherosclerosis. Combined procedures are used in some centers as a cost-cutting strategy. We performed a number of population-averaged and cluster-specific (conditional) analyses, which (a) make no adjustments for center effects of any kind; (b) make adjustments for the effect of center on only the response; or (c) make adjustments for both the effect of center on the response and the relationship between center and exposure. The method used for this third approach decomposes the procedure type variable into within-center and among-center components, resulting in two odds ratio estimates. The naive analysis, ignoring clusters, gave a highly significant effect of procedure type (OR = 1.6). Population average models gave marginally to very nonsignificant estimates of the OR for treatment type ranging from 1.6 to 1.2 with adjustment only for the effect of centers on response. These results depended on the assumed correlation structure. Conditional (cluster-specific) models and other methods that decomposed the treatment type variable into among- and within-center components all found no within-center effect of procedure type (OR = 1.02, consistently) and a considerable among-center effect. This among-center variability in outcomes was related to the proportion of patients who receive combined procedures and was found even when conditioned on procedure type (within-center) and other patient- and center-level covariates. This example illustrates the importance of addressing the potential for center effects to confound an outcome-exposure association when average exposure varies across clusters. While conditional approaches provide estimates of the within-cluster effect, they do not provide information about among-center effects. We recommend using the decomposition approach, as it provides both types of estimates." @default.
• W2159939252 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2159939252 creator A5020692170 @default.
• W2159939252 creator A5032541349 @default.
• W2159939252 creator A5047049575 @default.
• W2159939252 creator A5051242364 @default.
• W2159939252 date "1999-06-01" @default.
• W2159939252 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2159939252 title "An Empirical Comparison of Several Clustered Data Approaches Under Confounding Due to Cluster Effects in the Analysis of Complications of Coronary Angioplasty" @default.
• W2159939252 cites W1976566530 @default.
• W2159939252 cites W1978136073 @default.
• W2159939252 cites W1983068528 @default.
• W2159939252 cites W1992508564 @default.
• W2159939252 cites W1994552776 @default.
• W2159939252 cites W1997341045 @default.
• W2159939252 cites W1997588813 @default.
• W2159939252 cites W2029595363 @default.
• W2159939252 cites W2063342154 @default.
• W2159939252 cites W2077192207 @default.
• W2159939252 cites W2080337015 @default.
• W2159939252 cites W2082105048 @default.
• W2159939252 cites W2146713328 @default.
• W2159939252 cites W2319838316 @default.
• W2159939252 cites W2332891818 @default.
• W2159939252 cites W4244611409 @default.
• W2159939252 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00470.x" @default.
• W2159939252 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11318202" @default.
• W2159939252 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
• W2159939252 type Work @default.
• W2159939252 sameAs 2159939252 @default.
• W2159939252 citedByCount "92" @default.
• W2159939252 countsByYear W21599392522012 @default.
• W2159939252 countsByYear W21599392522013 @default.
• W2159939252 countsByYear W21599392522014 @default.
• W2159939252 countsByYear W21599392522015 @default.
• W2159939252 countsByYear W21599392522016 @default.
• W2159939252 countsByYear W21599392522017 @default.
• W2159939252 countsByYear W21599392522018 @default.
• W2159939252 countsByYear W21599392522019 @default.
• W2159939252 countsByYear W21599392522020 @default.
• W2159939252 countsByYear W21599392522021 @default.
• W2159939252 countsByYear W21599392522022 @default.
• W2159939252 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2159939252 hasAuthorship W2159939252A5020692170 @default.
• W2159939252 hasAuthorship W2159939252A5032541349 @default.
• W2159939252 hasAuthorship W2159939252A5047049575 @default.
• W2159939252 hasAuthorship W2159939252A5051242364 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C117220453 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C164866538 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C2779463800 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C2780326628 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C2780400711 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C77350462 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C8010536 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C105795698 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C117220453 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C126322002 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C149782125 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C156957248 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C164866538 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C185592680 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C199360897 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C2524010 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C2779463800 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C2780326628 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C2780400711 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C2908647359 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C33923547 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C41008148 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C500558357 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C71924100 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C77350462 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C8010536 @default.
• W2159939252 hasConceptScore W2159939252C99454951 @default.
• W2159939252 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2159939252 hasLocation W21599392521 @default.
• W2159939252 hasLocation W21599392522 @default.
• W2159939252 hasOpenAccess W2159939252 @default.
• W2159939252 hasPrimaryLocation W21599392521 @default.
• W2159939252 hasRelatedWork W1992228662 @default.
• W2159939252 hasRelatedWork W2188664023 @default.
• W2159939252 hasRelatedWork W2481749367 @default.
• W2159939252 hasRelatedWork W2585911331 @default.
• W2159939252 hasRelatedWork W2793477322 @default.
• W2159939252 hasRelatedWork W2994176440 @default.

• next