FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2162000397> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2162000397 endingPage "130" @default.
• W2162000397 startingPage "125" @default.
• W2162000397 abstract "ABSTRACT Retention in mandibular dentures has always been a challenge for the treating dentist. Denture adhesives are known to improve the adhesive bond between the denture and the underlying tissues. However, denture adhesives still remain unexplored and not much is known about the efficacy of these materials in mandibular dentures especially in patients with poor foundations. The present study was carried out to compare the efficacy of different commercially available denture adhesives in relation to their retentive ability in patients with good well formed mandibular ridges and in patients with resorbed and flat mandibular ridges. Seventy edentulous patients, age range between 50 to 70 years, were selected. The patients were divided into 2 groups; group 1 comprised of 35 patients with good well formed mandibular ridges and group 2 consisted of 35 patients having low well rounded mandibular ridges. The adhesion and cohesion that developed between the dentures and the underlying tissues when the various materials were interposed between them was evaluated with the help of a test apparatus in newtons. Mean value of retention in denture without adhesive was 9.93 N and 24.53 N in resorbed and well formed ridges respectively. Use of denture adhesive materials led to a higher value of retention as opposed to when the dentures were used without adhesives. This was true for patients with good well formed mandibular ridges as well as for patients with poor foundations. Among the various denture adhesive powders tested, Fittydent showed better results, i.e. 29.56 and 33.05 in resorbed and well-formed ridges respectively as opposed to fixon which showed values of 16.47 and 27.70 respectively. How to cite this article Malhotra P, Yadav B, Yadav H, Phukela SS. A Clinical Study to assess the Efficacy of Commonly Available Denture Adhesive Materials in Mandibular Dentures. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2013;3(4):125-130." @default.
• W2162000397 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2162000397 creator A5006391760 @default.
• W2162000397 creator A5008138510 @default.
• W2162000397 creator A5038555523 @default.
• W2162000397 creator A5082986333 @default.
• W2162000397 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2162000397 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W2162000397 title "A Clinical Study to assess the Efficacy of Commonly Available Denture Adhesive Materials in Mandibular Dentures" @default.
• W2162000397 cites W2032535912 @default.
• W2162000397 cites W2041192845 @default.
• W2162000397 cites W2062635818 @default.
• W2162000397 cites W2078299748 @default.
• W2162000397 cites W2094453365 @default.
• W2162000397 cites W2155024977 @default.
• W2162000397 doi "https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1091" @default.
• W2162000397 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2162000397 type Work @default.
• W2162000397 sameAs 2162000397 @default.
• W2162000397 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2162000397 countsByYear W21620003972020 @default.
• W2162000397 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2162000397 hasAuthorship W2162000397A5006391760 @default.
• W2162000397 hasAuthorship W2162000397A5008138510 @default.
• W2162000397 hasAuthorship W2162000397A5038555523 @default.
• W2162000397 hasAuthorship W2162000397A5082986333 @default.
• W2162000397 hasBestOaLocation W21620003971 @default.
• W2162000397 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2162000397 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2162000397 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2162000397 hasConcept C2779227376 @default.
• W2162000397 hasConcept C2780062004 @default.
• W2162000397 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2162000397 hasConcept C68928338 @default.
• W2162000397 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2162000397 hasConceptScore W2162000397C159985019 @default.
• W2162000397 hasConceptScore W2162000397C192562407 @default.
• W2162000397 hasConceptScore W2162000397C199343813 @default.
• W2162000397 hasConceptScore W2162000397C2779227376 @default.
• W2162000397 hasConceptScore W2162000397C2780062004 @default.
• W2162000397 hasConceptScore W2162000397C29694066 @default.
• W2162000397 hasConceptScore W2162000397C68928338 @default.
• W2162000397 hasConceptScore W2162000397C71924100 @default.
• W2162000397 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2162000397 hasLocation W21620003971 @default.
• W2162000397 hasOpenAccess W2162000397 @default.
• W2162000397 hasPrimaryLocation W21620003971 @default.
• W2162000397 hasRelatedWork W1970736313 @default.
• W2162000397 hasRelatedWork W1985246353 @default.
• W2162000397 hasRelatedWork W2028434337 @default.
• W2162000397 hasRelatedWork W2348965746 @default.
• W2162000397 hasRelatedWork W2366970374 @default.
• W2162000397 hasRelatedWork W2378708604 @default.
• W2162000397 hasRelatedWork W2383115444 @default.
• W2162000397 hasRelatedWork W2387409583 @default.
• W2162000397 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2162000397 hasRelatedWork W4226323713 @default.
• W2162000397 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W2162000397 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2162000397 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2162000397 magId "2162000397" @default.
• W2162000397 workType "article" @default.