FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2162687452> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2162687452 endingPage "34" @default.
• W2162687452 startingPage "26" @default.
• W2162687452 abstract "HomeRadiologyVol. 234, No. 1 PreviousNext Special ReportTraining, Competency, and Credentialing Standards for Diagnostic Cervicocerebral Angiography, Carotid Stenting, and Cerebrovascular InterventionA Joint Statement from the American Academy of Neurology1, American Association of Neurological Surgeons1, American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Radiology1, American Society of Neuroradiology1, Congress of Neurological Surgeons1, AANS/CNS Cerebrovascular Section1, and Society of Interventional Radiology12John J. Connors, III, David Sacks, Anthony J. Furlan, Warren R. Selman, Eric J. Russell, Philip E. Stieg, Mark N. HadleyJohn J. Connors, III, David Sacks, Anthony J. Furlan, Warren R. Selman, Eric J. Russell, Philip E. Stieg, Mark N. HadleyAuthor Affiliations1These organizations represent all clinical medical specialties with formal, accredited, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–approved training in the cervicocerebral vasculature and associated neurologic pathophysiology. The executive committees and governing bodies of each organization have approved this document.2From the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology (J.J.C.), Society of Interventional Radiology (D.S.), American Academy of Neurology (A.J.F.), American Association of Neurological Surgeons (W.R.S.), American Society of Neuroradiology (E.J.R.), AANS/CNS Cerebrovascular Section (P.E.S.), and Congress of Neurological Surgeons (M.H.). The complete list of authors and reviewers for the NeuroVascular Coalition Writing Group is in the Acknowledgments. Received July 30, 2004; accepted August 2. Address correspondence to J.J.C., Baptist Hospital of Miami, 8900 N Kendall Ave, Miami, FL 33133 (e-mail: [email protected]).John J. Connors, IIIDavid SacksAnthony J. FurlanWarren R. SelmanEric J. RussellPhilip E. StiegMark N. HadleyPublished Online:Jan 1 2005https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2341041349MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In References 1 Cerebral angiography: a report for health professionals by the executive committee of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association.Circulation1989; 79:474. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2 Wein TH, Hickenbottom SL, Alexandrov AV. Thrombolysis, stroke units and other strategies for reducing acute stroke costs. Pharmacoeconomics 1998; 14:603-611. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3 Berteloot D, Leclerc X, Leys D, et al. Cerebral angiography: a study of complications in 450 consecutive patients. J Radiol 1999; 80:843-848. Medline, Google Scholar4 Hankey GJ, Warlow CP, Molyneux AJ. Complications of cerebral angiography for patients with mild carotid territory ischaemia being considered for carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990; 53:542-548. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15:1401-1407. Medline, Google Scholar6 Davies KN, Humphrey PR. Complications of cerebral angiography in patients with symptomatic carotid territory ischemia screened by carotid ultrasound. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993; 56:967-972. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Mani RL, Eisenberg RL. Complications of catheter cerebral arteriography: analysis of 5000 procedures. II. Relation of complication rates to clinical and arteriographic diagnoses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978; 131:867-869. Google Scholar8 McIvor J, Steiner TJ, Perkins GD, et al. Neurological morbidity of arch angiography in cerebrovascular disease: the influence of contrast medium and the radiologist. Br J Radiol 1987; 60:117-122. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar9 Earnest F, 4th, Forbes G, Sandok BA, et al. Complications of cerebral angiography: prospective assessment of risk. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984; 142:247-253. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10 Dion JE, Gates PC, Fox AJ, et al. Clinical events following neuroangiography: a prospective study. Stroke 1987; 18:997-1004. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar11 Moran CJ, Milburn JM, Cross DT, et al. Randomized controlled trial of sheaths in diagnostic neuroangiography. Radiology 2001; 218:183-187. Link, Google Scholar12 Grzyska U, Freitag J, Zeumer H. Selective cerebral intraarterial DSA. Complication rate and control of risk factors. Neuroradiology 1990; 32:296-299. Google Scholar13 Horowitz MB, Dutton K, Purdy PD. Assessment of complication types and rates related to diagnostic angiography and interventional neuroradiologic procedures. Interv Neuroradiol 1998; 4:27-37. Crossref, Google Scholar14 Vitek JJ. Femoro-cerebral angiography: analysis of 2,000 consecutive examinations, special emphasis on carotid arteries catheterization in older patients. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1973; 118:633-647. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar15 Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, terBrugge K, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003; 227:522-528. Link, Google Scholar16 Kerber CW, Cromwell LD, Drayer BP, et al. Cerebral ischemia. I. Current angiographic techniques, complications, and safety. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978; 130:1097-1103. Google Scholar17 Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 1995; 273:1421-1428. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar18 Mani RL, Eisenberg RL, McDonald EJ, Jr, et al. Complications of catheter cerebral angiography: analysis of 5000 procedures. I. Criteria and incidence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978; 131:861-865. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar19 Mani RL, Eisenberg RL. Complication of catheter cerebral arteriography: analysis of 5000 procedures. III. Assessment of arteries injected, contrast medium used, duration of procedure and age of patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1978; 131:871-865. Google Scholar20 Johnston DC, Chapman KM, Goldstein LB. Low rate of complications of cerebral angiography in routine clinical practice. Neurology 2001; 57:2012-2014. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar21 Dagirmanjian A, Davis DA, Rothfus WE, et al. Detection of clinically silent intracranial emboli ipsilateral to internal carotid artery occlusions during cerebral angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:367-369. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar22 Kuntz KM, Skillman JJ, Whittemore AD, Kent KC. Carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients: is contrast angiography necessary? a morbidity analysis. J Vasc Surg 1995; 22:706-716. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar23 Bendszus M, Koltzenberg M, Burger R, et al. Silent embolism in diagnostic cerebral angiography and neurointerventional procedures: a prospective study. Lancet 1999; 354:1594-1597. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar24 Britt PM, Heiserman JE, Snider RM, et al. Incidence of postangiographic abnormalities revealed by diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21:55-59. Medline, Google Scholar25 Crawley F, Stygall J, Lunn S, et al. Comparison of microembolism detected by transcranial Doppler and neuropsychological sequelae of carotid surgery and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Stroke 2000; 31:1329-1334. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar26 Abbas SA, Glazier JJ, Wu AH, et al. Factors associated with the release of cardiac troponin T following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Clin Cardiol 1996; 19:782-786. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar27 Johansen O, Brekke M, Stromme JH, et al. Myocardial damage during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty as evidenced by troponin T measurements. Eur Heart J 1998; 19:112-117. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar28 Leape LL, Park RE, Bashore TM, et al. Effect of variability in the interpretation of coronary angiograms on the appropriateness of use of coronary revascularization procedures. Am Heart J 2000; 139:106-113. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar29 Beller GA, Bonow RO, Fuster V, Core Cardiology Training Symposium (COCATS). ACC revised recommendations for training in adult cardiovascular medicine: Core Cardiology Training II (COCATS 2)—(Revision of the 1995 COCATS training statement). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39:1242-1246. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar30 Jamal SM, Shrive FM, Ghali WA, et al. In-hospital outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in Canada: 1992/93 to 2000/01. Can J Cardiol 2003; 19:782-789. Medline, Google Scholar31 Anderson HV, Shaw RE, Brindis RG, et al. A contemporary overview of percutaneous coronary interventions. The American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR). J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39:1096-1103. Google Scholar32 Roubin GS, Yadav S, Iyer SS, Vitek J. Carotid stent-supported angioplasty: a neurovascular intervention to prevent stroke. Am J Cardiol 1996; 78:8-12. Crossref, Google Scholar33 Diethrich EB, Ndiaye M, Reid DB, et al. Stenting in the carotid artery: Initial experience in 110 patients. J Endovasc Surg 1996; 3:42-62. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar34 Wholey MH, Wholey M, Bergeron P, et al. Current global status of carotid artery stent placement. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998; 44:1-6. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar35 Jordan WD, Jr, Voellinger DC, Fisher WS, Redden D, McDowell HA. A comparison of carotid angioplasty with stenting versus endarterectomy with regional anesthesia. J Vasc Surg 1998; 28:397-403. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar36 Yadav J. SAPPHIRE trial: 1-year results. Presented at the 29th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society of Interventional Radiology March 25–30, 2004. Google Scholar37 Wholey M. ARCHER trial: One-month results. Presented at the 29th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society of Interventional Radiology March 25–30, 2004. Google Scholar38 Alberts MJ, for the publications committee of the Wallstent Trial. Results of a multicenter prospective randomized trial of carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy (abstr). Stroke 2001; 32:325. Crossref, Google Scholar39 Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial.Lancet2001; 357:1729-1737. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar40 Wholey MH, Wholey M, Mathias K, et al. Global experience in cervical carotid artery stent placement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 50:160-167. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar41 Yadav J. SAPPHIRE trial: 1 year results. Presented at the Trans Catheter Therapeutics Meeting, Washington DC, September 15–19, 2003. Google Scholar42 Jaeger HJ, Mathias KD, Hauth E, et al. Cerebral ischemia detected with diffusion-weighted MR imaging after stent implantation in the carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23:200-207. Medline, Google Scholar43 Jaeger HJ, Mathias KD, Drescher R, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging after angioplasty or angioplasty plus stenting of arteries supplying the brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22:1251-1259. Medline, Google Scholar44 Vitek JJ, Roubin GS, Al-Mubarek N, et al. Carotid artery stenting: technical considerations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21:1736-1743. Medline, Google Scholar45 Mathias K. Results of European trials. Presented at the 29th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society of Interventional Radiology, Phoenix, Ariz, March 25–30, 2004. Google Scholar46 Macdonald S, Cleveland TJ, Gaines P, et al. Neuropsychometric outcomes of unprotected and protected carotid stenting (EmboShield): a randomized trial (abstr). J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15(2 pt 2):S184-S185. Google Scholar47 Macdonald S, Cleveland TJ, Gaines PA, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to compare protected and unprotected carotid stenting: a randomized trial (abstr). J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15(2 pt 2):S185. Google Scholar48 Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, EVA-3S Investigators. Carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection: clinical alert from the Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial. Stroke [serial online] 2004; 35:e18-e20. Available at: stroke.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/35/1/e18. Google Scholar49 Kastrup A, Groschel K, Krapf H, et al. Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with or without protection devices: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke 2003; 34:813-819. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar50 Lee JH, Kwon SU, Lee JH, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis: long-term follow-up. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003; 15:90-107. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar51 Gress DR, Smith WS, Dowd CF, et al. Angioplasty for intracranial symptomatic vertebrobasilar ischemia. Neurosurgery 2002; 51:23-27. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar52 Lylyk P, Cohen JE, Ceratto R, et al. Angioplasty and stent placement in intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses and dissections. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23:430-436. Medline, Google Scholar53 Levy EI, Horowitz MB, Koebbe CJ, et al. Transluminal stent-assisted angioplasty of the intracranial vertebrobasilar system for medically refractory, posterior circulation ischemia: early results. Neurosurgery 2001; 48:1215-1221. Medline, Google Scholar54 Alazzaz A, Thornton J, Aletich VA, et al. Intracranial percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for arteriosclerotic stenosis. Arch Neurol 2000; 57:1625-1630. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar55 Nahser HC, Henkes H, Weber W, et al. Intracranial vertebrobasilar stenosis: angioplasty and follow-up. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21:1293-1301. Medline, Google Scholar56 Rasmussen PA, Perl J, 2nd, Barr JD, et al. Stent-assisted angioplasty of intracranial vertebrobasilar atherosclerosis: an initial experience. J Neurosurg 2000; 92:771-778. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar57 Connors JJ, 3rd, Wojak JC. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for intracranial atherosclerotic lesions: evolution of technique and short-term results. J Neurosurg 1999; 91:415-423. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar58 Marks MP, Marcellus M, Norbash AM, et al. Outcome of angioplasty for atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis. Stroke 1999; 30:1065-1069. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar59 Callahan AS, 3rd, Berger BL. Balloon angioplasty of intracranial arteries for stroke prevention. J Neuroimaging 1997; 7:232-235. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar60 Singh V, Gress DR, Higashida RT, et al. The learning curve for coil embolization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23:768-771. Medline, Google Scholar61 Murayama Y, Nien YL, Duckwiler G, et al. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years’ experience. J Neurosurg 2003; 98:959-966. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar62 Lozier AP, Connolly ES, Jr, Lavine SD, Solomon RA. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of posterior circulation aneurysms: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke 2002; 33:2509-2518. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar63 Malek AM, Halbach VV, Phatouros CC, et al. Balloon-assist technique for endovascular coil embolization of geometrically difficult intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2000; 46:1397-1406. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar64 Vinuela F, Duckwiler G, Mawad M. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of acute intracranial aneurysm: perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients. J Neurosurg 1997; 86:475-482. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar65 Soeda A, Sakai N, Sakai H, et al. Thromboembolic events associated with Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of asymptomatic cerebral aneurysms: evaluation of 66 consecutive cases with use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24:127-132. Medline, Google Scholar66 Armbruster JS. Accreditation of residency training in the US. Postgrad Med J 1996; 72:391-394. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar67 Redman HC. The route to subspecialty accreditation. Radiology 1989; 172:893-894. Link, Google Scholar68 Langsley DG. What is the American Board of Medical Specialties? Pathologist 1985; 39:30-32. Medline, Google Scholar69 Fader T, Gunzburger LK, Hartmann J, et al. Implementing meaningful CME as an essential component in a community hospital quality assurance plan. J Contin Educ Health Prof 1988; 8:231-237. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar70 Cleves MA, Weiner JP, Cohen W, et al. Assessing HCFA’s Health Care Quality Improvement Program. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1997; 23:550-560. Medline, Google Scholar71 Kremer BK. Physician recertification and outcomes assessment. Eval Health Prof 1991; 14:187-200. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar72 Pelletier LR, Tackett S. The Performance Measurement Coordinating Council: a town meeting. J Healthc Qual 2000; 22:24-31. Crossref, Google Scholar73 Hernandez AM. Trends in healthcare practitioner credentialing. J Health Care Finance 1998; 24:66-70. Medline, Google Scholar74 Skolnick AA. JCAHO, NCQA, and AMAP establish council to coordinate health care performance measurement. JAMA 1998; 279:1769-1770. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar75 Alberts MJ, Hademenos G, Latchaw RE, et al. Recommendations for the establishment of Primary Stroke Centers. JAMA 2000; 283:3102-3109. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar76 Standards of Practice Committee of the Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology. Angioplasty standard of practice. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1992; 3:269-271. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar77 American Society of Neuroradiology, American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology. Quality improvement guidelines for adult diagnostic neuroangiography: cooperative study between the ASNR, ASITN, and the SCVIR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21:146-150. Medline, Google Scholar78 Levin DC, Becker GJ, Dorros G, et al. Training standards for physicians performing peripheral angioplasty and other percutaneous peripheral vascular interventions: a statement for health professionals from the Special Group of Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, and Clinical Cardiology, the American Heart Association. Circulation 1992; 86:1348-1350. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar79 Spittell JA, Nanda NC, Creager MA, et al. Recommendations for peripheral transluminal angioplasty: training and facilities. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 21:546-548. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar80 White RA. Endovascular credentialing. Endovascular Surgery Credentialing and Training Subcommittee. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1995; 6:287-289. Google Scholar81 Standards of Practice Committee of the Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology. Standard for diagnostic arteriography in adults. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1993; 4:385-395. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar82 American College of Radiology. Standard for the performance of diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography in adults: res 5–1999—American College of Radiology Standards 2000–2001. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2000; 415-426. Google Scholar83 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Ad Hoc Task Force on Cardiac Catheterization. ACC/AHA guidelines for cardiac catheterization and cardiac catheterization laboratories. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18:1149-1182. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar84 Training Program Standards Committee. Standards for training in cardiac catheterization and angiography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1980; 6:345-348. Crossref, Google Scholar85 Friesinger GC, Adams DF, Bourassa MG, et al. Optimal resources for examination of the heart and lungs: cardiac catheterization and radiographic facilities. Circulation 1983; 68:891A-930A. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar86 Conti CR, Faxon DP, Gruentzig AR, et al. 17th Bethesda Conference: adult cardiology training—Task Force III: training in cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 7:1205-1206. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar87 Hodgson JM, Tommaso CL, Watson RM, et al. Core curriculum for the training of adult invasive cardiologists: report of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Committee on Training Standards. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996; 37:392-408. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar88 Hirshfeld JW, Jr, Ellis SG, Faxon DP, et al. Recommendations for the assessment and maintenance of proficiency in coronary interventional procedures: statement of the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31:722-743. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar89 Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty).J Am Coll Cardiol1993; 22:2033-2054. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar90 Weaver WF, Myler RK, Sheldon WC, et al. Guidelines for physician performance of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1985; 11:109-112. Crossref, Google Scholar91 Guidelines for the performance of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.Circulation1982; 66:693-694. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar92 Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty).J Am Coll Cardiol1988; 12:529-545. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar93 Cowley MJ, King SB, 3rd, Baim D, et al. Guidelines for credentialing and facilities for performance of coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1988; 15:136-138. Crossref, Google Scholar94 Clinical competence in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a statement for physicians from the ACP/ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Privileges in Cardiology.Circulation1990; 81:2041-2046. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar95 Gomez C, Kinkel P, Masdeu J, et al. American Academy of Neurology guidelines for credentialing in neuroimaging: report from the task force on updating guidelines for credentialing in neuroimaging. Neurology 1997; 49:1734-1737. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar96 Bakshi R, Alexandrov AV, Gomez CR, Masdeu JC. Neuroimaging curriculum for neurology trainees: report from the Neuroimaging Section of the AAN. J Neuroimaging 2003; 13:215-217. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar97 Higashida RT, Hopkins LN, Berenstein A, et al. Program requirements for residency/fellowship education in neuroendovascular surgery/interventional neuroradiology: a special report on graduate medical education. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21:1153-1159. Medline, Google Scholar98 White RA, Hodgson KJ, Ahn SS, et al. Endovascular interventions training and credentialing for vascular surgeons. J Vasc Surg 1999; 29:177-186. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar99 American Board of Internal Medicine Committee on Interventional Cardiology. Certificate of Added Qualifications in Interventional Cardiology. Available at: www.abim.org/subspec/ic.htm. Accessed July 28 2004. Google Scholar100 American Board of Radiology. Certificate in Diagnostic Radiology. Available at: www.theabr.org/diagnostic.htm. Accessed July 28 2004. Google Scholar101 ACGME. Program requirements for residency education in neuroradiology. Available at: www.cgme.org/downloads/RRC_progReq/422pr602.pdf. Accessed July 28 2004. Google Scholar102 ACGME. Program requirements for residency education in vascular neurology. Available at: www.acgme.org/downloads/RRC_progReq/188pr202.pdf. Accessed July 28 2004. Google Scholar103 ACGME. Program requirements for residency education in endovascular surgical neuroradiology. Available at: www.acgme.org/downloads/RRC_progReq/422pr403.pdf. Accessed July 28 2004. Google Scholar104 ACGME. Program requirements for graduate medical education in diagnostic radiology. Available at: www.acgme.org/downloads/RRC_progReq/420pr702.pdf. Accessed July 28 2004. Google Scholar105 Murray WB, Good ML, Gravenstein JS, et al. Learning about new anesthetics using a model driven, full human simulator. J Clin Monit Comput 2002; 17:293-300. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar106 Schwid HA, Rooke GA, Carline J, et al. Evaluation of anesthesia residents using mannequin-based simulation: a multiinstitutional study. Anesthesiology 2002; 97:1434-1444. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar107 Watterson JD, Beiko DT, Kuan JK, Denstedt JD. Randomized prospective blinded study validating acquisition of ureteroscopy skills using computer based virtual reality endourological simulator. J Urol 2002; 168:1928-1932. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar108 Rowe R, Cohen RA. An evaluation of a virtual reality airway simulator. Anesth Analg 2002; 95:62-66. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar109 Forrest FC, Taylor MA, Postlethwaite K, Aspinall R. Use of a high-fidelity simulator to develop testing of the technical performance of novice anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88:338-344. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar110 Byrne AJ, Greaves JD. Assessment instruments used during anaesthetic simulation: review of published studies. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86:445-450. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar111 Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Hart IR, et al. Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment. JAMA 1999; 282:861-866. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar112 Riley RH, Wilks DH, Freeman JA. Anaesthetists’ attitudes towards an anaesthesia simulator: a comparative survey—U.S.A. and Australia. Anaesth Intensive Care 1997; 25:514-519. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar113 Barr JD, Connors JJ, 3rd, Sacks D, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of cervical carotid angioplasty and stent placement: the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, the American Society of Neuroradiology, and the Society of Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14(9 pt 1):1079-1093. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar114 McGrath PD, Wennberg DE, Dickens JD, Jr, et al. Relation between operator and hospital volume and outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of the coronary stent. JAMA 2000; 284:3139-3144. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar115 Wennberg DE, Lucas FL, Birkmeyer JD, Bredenberg CE, Fisher ES. Variation in carotid endarterectomy mortality in the Medicare population: trial hospitals, volume, and patient characteristics. JAMA 1998; 279:1278-1281. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar116 Hannan EL, Wu C, Ryan TJ, et al. Do hospitals and surgeons with higher coronary artery bypass graft surgery volumes still have lower risk-adjusted mortality rates? Circulation 2003; 108:795-801. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarArticle HistoryPublished in print: Jan 2005 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByLearning curve and proficiency metrics for transcarotid artery revascularizationBrajesh K.Lal, MinervaMayorga-Carlin, VikramKashyap, WilliamJordan, DipankarMukherjee, RichardCambria, WesleyMoore, Richard F.Neville, Hans-HenningEckstein, ShaliniSahoo, SumairaMacdonald, John D.Sorkin2022 | Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 75, No. 6Aortic arch types and postoperative outcomes after carotid artery stenting in asymptomatic and symptomatic patientsRenatoCasana, DanieleBissacco, ChiaraMalloggi, Valerio S.Tolva, AndreaOdero Jr, MaurizioDomanin, SantiTrimarchi, VincenzoSilani, GianfrancoParati2021 | International Angiology, Vol. 39, No. 6Segmentation-based blood flow parameter refinement in cerebrovascular structures using 4D arterial spin labeling MRARenzoPhellan, ThomasLindner, MichaelHelle, AlexandreFalcao, ClarissaYasuda, MagdalenaSokolska, Rolf H.Jager, Nils DanielForkert2019 | IEEE Transactions on Biomedical EngineeringImaging of intracranial hemorrhage: Subarachnoid hemorrhage and its sequelaeMatthew D.Alexander, Nerissa U.Ko, Steven W.Hetts2015 | Applied RadiologyCarotid Artery Stenting: Second Consensus Document of the ICCS/ISO-SPREAD Joint CommitteeGaetanoLanza, CarloSetacci, AlbertoCremonesi, StefanoRicci, DomenicoInzitari, Gianmarcode Donato, PatrizioCastelli, CarloPratesi, FlavioPeinetti, JessicaLanza, AugustoZaninelli, Gian FrancoGensini2014 | Cerebrovascular Diseases, Vol. 38, No. 2Intracranial Angioplasty and Stent Placement After Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) Trial: Present State and Future Considerations⋆Adnan IQureshi, Fahmi M.Al-Senani, ShakirHusain, Nazli A.Janjua, GiuseppeLanzino, Pablo M.Lavados, ThanhNguyen, JeanRaymond, Qaisar A.Shah, Jose I.Suarez, M. Fareed K.Suri, RehaTolun2012 | Journal of Neuroimaging, Vol. 22, No. 1The Role of 3 Tesla MRA in the Detection of Intracranial AneurysmsEftychia Z.Kapsalaki, Christos D.Rountas, Kostas N.Fountas2012 | International Journal of Vascular Medicine, Vol. 2012Assessment of an Introductory Cervicocerebral Catheter Angiography Learning Program: A Pilot StudyY.W.Lui, J.M.Farinhas, A.M.Basalely, K.A.Hsu, K.Freeman, J.A.Bello2012 | American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 33, No. 6Interpretation and Implications of the Prematurely Terminated Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in the Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) TrialAdnan I.Qureshi2012 | Neurosurgery, Vol. 70, No. 1Carotid artery dissections: Thrombosis of the false lumenIvanStevic, Howard H.W.Chan, Anthony K.C.Chan2011 | Thrombosis Research, Vol. 128, No. 4Lumen Morphology in Mild-to-Moderate Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Correlates with Neurological SymptomsMasaakiHokari, SatoshiKuroda, HiroshiYasuda, NaokiNakayama, SatoruAbe, YoshinobuIwasaki, HisatoshiSaito2011 | Journal of Neuroimaging, Vol. 21, No. 4Can experienced physicians with high peripheral interventional volume but low carotid artery stenting (CAS) volume achieve low complication rates during CAS?M.Rizwan Khalid, FatimaKhalid, F. AliFarooqui, DianaDragoi, KhusrowNiazi2011 | EuroIntervention, Vol. 6, No. 6Contemporary CardiologyFaisalAlquoofi, Ronak S.Kanani2009Practical Carotid Artery StentingGerardStansby, SumairaMacdonald2009New data about stenting versus endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid artery stenosisLarry B.Goldstein2009 | Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, Vol. 11, No. 3ESVS Guidelines. Invasive Treatment for Carotid Stenosis: Indications, TechniquesC.D.Liapis, Sir P.R.F.Bell, D.Mikhailidis, J.Sivenius, A.Nicolaides, J.Fernandes e Fernandes, G.Biasi, L.Norgren2009 | European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 37, No. 4An analysis of carotid artery stenting procedures performed in New York and Florida (2005-2006): Procedure indication, stroke rate, and mortality rate are equivalent for vascular surgeons and non-vascular surgeonsRobertSteppacher, NicholasCsikesz, MohammadEslami, EliasArous, LouisMessina, AndresSchanzer2009 | Journal of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 49, No. 6Carotid artery stenting vs. endarterectomyM.Roffi, D.Mukherjee, D. G.Clair2009 | European Heart Journal, Vol. 30, No. 22Diagnostic Methods in the Cardiac Catheterization LaboratoryMarcoRoffi, ZsoltKulcsár2009Qualification Requirements for Performing Neurointerventional Procedures: A Report of the Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Neuroimaging and the Society of Vascular and Interventional NeurologyAdnan I.Qureshi, AlexAbou-Chebl, Tudor G.Jovin2008 | Journal of Neuroimaging, Vol. 18, No. 4Carotid Artery Stenting for High-risk Patients(2. Atherosclerotic Internal Carotid Artery Disease and High Risk Patients,<SPECIAL ISSUES>Stroke as a Systemic Vascular Disease)ShigeruMiyachi2008 | Japanese Journal of Neurosurgery, Vol. 17, No. 12Training for Carotid Intervention: Preparing the Next GenerationS.A.Black, V.A.Pandey, J.H.N.Wolfe2007 | European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Vol. 33, No. 5ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Carotid StentingEric R.Bates, Joseph D.Babb, Donald E.Casey, Christopher U.Cates, Gary R.Duckwiler, Ted E.Feldman, William A.Gray, KennethOuriel, Eric D.Peterson, KennethRosenfield, John H.Rundback, Robert D.Safian, Michael A.Sloan, Christopher J.White, Robert A.Harrington, JonathanAbrams, Jeffrey L.Anderson, Eric R.Bates, Mark J.Eisenberg, Cindy L.Grines, Mark A.Hlatky, Robert C.Lichtenberg, Jonathan R.Lindner, Gerald M.Pohost, Richard S.Schofield, Samuel J.Shubrooks, James H.Stein, Cynthia M.Tracy, Robert A.Vogel, Deborah J.Wesley2007 | Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 49, No. 1What are Current Preprocedure Imaging Requirements for Carotid Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy: Have Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Computed Tomographic Angiography Made a Difference?Thomas S.Maldonado2007 | Seminars in Vascular Surgery, Vol. 20, No. 4ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Carotid StentingEric R.Bates, Chair Joseph D.Babb, Donald E.Casey, Christopher U.Cates, Gary R.Duckwiler, Ted E.Feldman, William A.Gray, KennethOuriel, Eric D.Peterson, KennethRosenfield, John H.Rundback, Robert D.Safian, Michael A.Sloan, Christopher J.White2007 | Vascular Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 1Complications and Follow-up after Unprotected Carotid Artery StentingElke A.M.Hauth, RobertDrescher, ChristianJansen, H. MartinGissler, MichaelSchwarz, MichaelForsting, Horst J.Jaeger, Klaus D.Mathias2006 | CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 29, No. 4Techniques in carotid artery stentingLucStockx2006 | European Journal of Radiology, Vol. 60, No. 1Current Diagnostic Modalities for Intracranial AneurysmsSergeBracard, RenéAnxionnat, LucPicard2006 | Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, Vol. 16, No. 3Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology 2005DavidPelz, TommyAndersson, MichaelSoderman, PedroLylyk, MakotoNegoro2006 | Stroke, Vol. 37, No. 2Carotid Artery StentingAlbertoCremonesi, CarloSetacci, AngeloBignamini, LeonardoBolognese, FrancescoBriganti, GermanoDi Sciascio, DomenicoInzitari, GaetanoLanza, LucianoLupattelli, SalvatoreMangiafico, CarloPratesi, BernardReimers, StefanoRicci, Gianmarcode Donato, UgoUgolotti, AugustoZaninelli, Gian FrancoGensini2006 | Stroke, Vol. 37, No. 9Carotid Stent Placement, Stroke Prevention, and Training1David Sacks, , and John J. Connors, III, 1 January 2005 | Radiology, Vol. 234, No. 1Radiology 2005—What’s Happening?Anthony V. Proto, 1 January 2005 | Radiology, Vol. 234, No. 1Part 9: Adult Stroke2005 | Circulation, Vol. 112, No. 24_supplementRecommended Articles A Rock and a Hard Place: Benefit and Risk in the Evolving Practice of Endovascular Therapy for Intracranial Atherosclerotic StenosisRadiology2023Volume: 307Issue: 4New Diffusion Abnormalities Following Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial AtherosclerosisRadiology2023Volume: 307Issue: 4Arterial Spin Labeling: Techniques, Clinical Applications, and InterpretationRadioGraphics2022Volume: 43Issue: 1The Use and Pitfalls of Intracranial Vessel Wall Imaging: How We Do ItRadiology2017Volume: 286Issue: 1pp. 12-28Ischemic Infarction in Young Adults: A Review for RadiologistsRadioGraphics2019Volume: 39Issue: 6pp. 1629-1648See More RSNA Education Exhibits Live and in Color: Imaging of Neurovascular DevicesDigital Posters2022Carotid Bulb Lesions: Reviewing Imaging Patterns and Differential DiagnosesDigital Posters2020Role of High Resolution Vessel Wall Imaging in Recognizing Vulnerable Intracranial Atherosclerotic PlaquesDigital Posters2019 RSNA Case Collection Carotid WebRSNA Case Collection2020Moyamoya DiseaseRSNA Case Collection2021Ischemic stroke in moyamoya diseaseRSNA Case Collection2020 Vol. 234, No. 1 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download" @default.
• W2162687452 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2162687452 creator A5026825623 @default.
• W2162687452 creator A5030596318 @default.
• W2162687452 creator A5032784685 @default.
• W2162687452 creator A5042671764 @default.
• W2162687452 creator A5043783211 @default.
• W2162687452 creator A5083784159 @default.
• W2162687452 creator A5084510096 @default.
• W2162687452 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W2162687452 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2162687452 title "Training, Competency, and Credentialing Standards for Diagnostic Cervicocerebral Angiography, Carotid Stenting, and Cerebrovascular Intervention" @default.
• W2162687452 cites W114113150 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W115404058 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1557604963 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W163656463 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1955664145 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1965451731 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1965807105 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1965849267 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1971400758 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1973352840 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1976670526 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1978487164 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1978606782 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1978823478 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1980619534 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1981206779 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1982081844 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1982335865 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1984398197 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1986414672 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1986757453 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1992207625 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W1992334086 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2000473513 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2000656872 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2001514859 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2003235472 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2007235784 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2009842756 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2011094251 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2012321895 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2031291940 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2032079577 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2042674308 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2046582806 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2053316993 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2055721340 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2058836765 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2065716920 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2065740147 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2066490019 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2072791280 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2073102660 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2076033687 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2076554050 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2077507304 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2081132325 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2081645438 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2082537724 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2085364515 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2092356718 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2092689878 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2093394693 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2109275503 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2112573578 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2113274166 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2131138492 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2131813159 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2132511760 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2132655363 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2139799421 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2141681919 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2143436751 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2145187997 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2147142748 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2149397443 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2149475645 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2150195370 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2167148122 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2169436924 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2170202608 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2170376428 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2336628146 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2338278796 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2410865055 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2411189466 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2424242792 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2887548265 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W2912507137 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W3026863776 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W4230059346 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W4234441804 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W4239222279 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W4244807166 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W4247648106 @default.
• W2162687452 cites W4251292767 @default.

• next