FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2163144057> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2163144057 endingPage "66" @default.
• W2163144057 startingPage "62" @default.
• W2163144057 abstract "To determine intraobserver and interobserver variability of carotid arteriography interpretation as well as the reliability of simple visual interpretation (SVI) or eyeballing of arteriography in the measurement of internal carotid artery stenoses.Intraobserver and interobserver measurements of 200 carotid arteriograms were performed in a blinded fashion by two vascular surgeons (VS1 and VS2) using a digital caliber computer program similar to software available in catheterization laboratories. The distal normal internal carotid artery was used as a frame of reference. These computer-derived measurements were compared with previous SVI measurements, found by retrospective chart review, that were performed at the initial time of arteriography.Intraobserver agreement (VS1a vs VS1b and VS2a vs VS2b) within +/-5% using the computer program was 94% and 92%. Interobserver agreement within +/-5% using the computer program for the four possible combinations ranged from 43% to 48%. Interobserver agreement using the computer program increased to 83% to 88% for correct stenosis interpretation within +/-20%. In the 16% to 49% category (by computer measurement), SVI would have placed the stenosis in a higher category 40% to 56% of the time. Likewise, in the 50% to 79% category, comparing SVI with the four different computer caliber measurements, SVI overestimated the stenosis to the 80% to 99% category by 30% to 44%. In the 80% to 99% category, SVI overestimated lesions in 27% to 51% of the cases. All occlusions seen on SVI correlated with computer program measurements. The computer readings in many cases downgraded the degree of carotid stenosis into a lower category and in some cases, may have led to a different treatment paradigm. SVI never underestimated carotid stenosis compared with all matched computer program measurements.Compared with a method of objective measurement similar to that used in a catheterization laboratory, SVI overestimated most carotid artery stenoses. Given the coming era of carotid stenting and a renewed need for arteriography before carotid intervention, knowledge of variability and correct interpretation of carotid stenosis using available technology remains paramount to warranted treatment." @default.
• W2163144057 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2163144057 creator A5007515567 @default.
• W2163144057 creator A5033064818 @default.
• W2163144057 creator A5068736775 @default.
• W2163144057 creator A5069797725 @default.
• W2163144057 creator A5076257009 @default.
• W2163144057 creator A5090380076 @default.
• W2163144057 date "2005-07-01" @default.
• W2163144057 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2163144057 title "The inaccuracy of simple visual interpretation for measurement of carotid stenosis by arteriography" @default.
• W2163144057 cites W1975857275 @default.
• W2163144057 cites W2002538330 @default.
• W2163144057 cites W2005834212 @default.
• W2163144057 cites W2009998042 @default.
• W2163144057 cites W2021769571 @default.
• W2163144057 cites W2046136144 @default.
• W2163144057 cites W2065182005 @default.
• W2163144057 cites W2115164341 @default.
• W2163144057 cites W2767911074 @default.
• W2163144057 cites W4324264875 @default.
• W2163144057 cites W4376848366 @default.
• W2163144057 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2005.03.028" @default.
• W2163144057 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16012453" @default.
• W2163144057 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2163144057 type Work @default.
• W2163144057 sameAs 2163144057 @default.
• W2163144057 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2163144057 countsByYear W21631440572019 @default.
• W2163144057 countsByYear W21631440572020 @default.
• W2163144057 countsByYear W21631440572022 @default.
• W2163144057 countsByYear W21631440572023 @default.
• W2163144057 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2163144057 hasAuthorship W2163144057A5007515567 @default.
• W2163144057 hasAuthorship W2163144057A5033064818 @default.
• W2163144057 hasAuthorship W2163144057A5068736775 @default.
• W2163144057 hasAuthorship W2163144057A5069797725 @default.
• W2163144057 hasAuthorship W2163144057A5076257009 @default.
• W2163144057 hasAuthorship W2163144057A5090380076 @default.
• W2163144057 hasBestOaLocation W21631440571 @default.
• W2163144057 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2163144057 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2163144057 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
• W2163144057 hasConcept C2780643987 @default.
• W2163144057 hasConcept C2987047532 @default.
• W2163144057 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2163144057 hasConceptScore W2163144057C126838900 @default.
• W2163144057 hasConceptScore W2163144057C164705383 @default.
• W2163144057 hasConceptScore W2163144057C2780007028 @default.
• W2163144057 hasConceptScore W2163144057C2780643987 @default.
• W2163144057 hasConceptScore W2163144057C2987047532 @default.
• W2163144057 hasConceptScore W2163144057C71924100 @default.
• W2163144057 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2163144057 hasLocation W21631440571 @default.
• W2163144057 hasLocation W21631440572 @default.
• W2163144057 hasOpenAccess W2163144057 @default.
• W2163144057 hasPrimaryLocation W21631440571 @default.
• W2163144057 hasRelatedWork W2054316717 @default.
• W2163144057 hasRelatedWork W2103909095 @default.
• W2163144057 hasRelatedWork W2143189459 @default.
• W2163144057 hasRelatedWork W2347640870 @default.
• W2163144057 hasRelatedWork W2354676216 @default.
• W2163144057 hasRelatedWork W2385642067 @default.
• W2163144057 hasRelatedWork W2388120573 @default.
• W2163144057 hasRelatedWork W2389082501 @default.
• W2163144057 hasRelatedWork W2419033198 @default.
• W2163144057 hasRelatedWork W2461988034 @default.
• W2163144057 hasVolume "42" @default.
• W2163144057 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2163144057 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2163144057 magId "2163144057" @default.
• W2163144057 workType "article" @default.