FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2163302870> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2163302870 abstract "Local anaesthesia for cataract surgery can be provided by sub-Tenon's or topical anaesthesia. Both techniques offer possible advantages. This review, which originally was published in 2007 and was updated in 2014, was undertaken to compare these two anaesthetic techniques.Our objectives were to compare the effectiveness of topical anaesthesia (with or without intracameral local anaesthetic) versus sub-Tenon's anaesthesia in providing pain relief during cataract surgery. We reviewed pain during administration of anaesthesia, postoperative pain, surgical satisfaction with operating conditions and patient satisfaction with pain relief provided, and we looked at associated complications.We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and EMBASE (last search in November 2014) and the reference lists of published articles. We looked for conferences abstracts and trials in progress and placed no constraints on language or publication status.We included all randomized studies that compared sub-Tenon's anaesthesia versus topical anaesthesia for cataract surgery.We assessed trial quality and extracted data in the format allowing maximal data inclusion.We included eight studies in this updated review but could retain in the analysis only seven studies on 742 operated eyes of 617 participants. Two cross-over trials included 125 participants, and five parallel trials included 492 participants. These studies were published between 1997 and 2005. The mean age of participants varied from 71.5 years to 83.5 years. The female proportion of participants varied from 54% to 76%. Compared with sub-Tenon's anaesthesia, topical anaesthesia (with or without intracameral injection) for cataract surgery increases intraoperative pain but decreases postoperative pain at 24 hours. The amplitude of the effect (equivalent to 1.1 on a score from 0 to 10 for intraoperative pain, and to 0.2 on the same scale for postoperative pain at 24 hours), although statistically significant, was probably too small to be of clinical relevance. The quality of the evidence was rated as high for intraoperative pain and moderate for pain at 24 hours. We did find differences in pain during administration of local anaesthetic (low level of evidence), and indications that surgeon satisfaction (low level of evidence) and participant satisfaction (moderate level of evidence) were less with topical anaesthesia. There was not enough evidence to say that one technique would result in a higher or lower incidence of intraoperative complications compared with the other.Both topical anaesthesia and sub-Tenon's anaesthesia are accepted and safe methods of providing anaesthesia for cataract surgery. An acceptable degree of intraoperative discomfort has to be expected with either of these techniques. Randomized controlled trials on the effects of various strategies to prevent intraoperative pain during cataract surgery could prove useful." @default.
• W2163302870 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2163302870 creator A5041243021 @default.
• W2163302870 creator A5063293568 @default.
• W2163302870 date "2015-08-27" @default.
• W2163302870 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2163302870 title "Sub-Tenon's anaesthesia versus topical anaesthesia for cataract surgery" @default.
• W2163302870 cites W1561963843 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W1576173198 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W1849396775 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W1908515604 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W1946533893 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W1964218750 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W1970217628 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W1972261262 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W1979935408 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W1986640553 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W1991701062 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W1998740118 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2007035750 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2009603687 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2009777982 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2028945486 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2042381024 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2044978753 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2046048492 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2046434948 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2051664330 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2057104375 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2069084057 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2071300369 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2085915844 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2090132603 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2102696978 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2104675861 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2104909710 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2117679116 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2125435699 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2130588898 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2139306818 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2142510618 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2156287648 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2156964849 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2164586769 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2165010366 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2165959381 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2169629898 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2208548284 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2229554356 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2337424378 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2588681363 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W2916841405 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W4252300654 @default.
• W2163302870 cites W4255503248 @default.
• W2163302870 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd006291.pub3" @default.
• W2163302870 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26308931" @default.
• W2163302870 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2163302870 type Work @default.
• W2163302870 sameAs 2163302870 @default.
• W2163302870 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W2163302870 countsByYear W21633028702016 @default.
• W2163302870 countsByYear W21633028702017 @default.
• W2163302870 countsByYear W21633028702018 @default.
• W2163302870 countsByYear W21633028702019 @default.
• W2163302870 countsByYear W21633028702020 @default.
• W2163302870 countsByYear W21633028702021 @default.
• W2163302870 countsByYear W21633028702022 @default.
• W2163302870 countsByYear W21633028702023 @default.
• W2163302870 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2163302870 hasAuthorship W2163302870A5041243021 @default.
• W2163302870 hasAuthorship W2163302870A5063293568 @default.
• W2163302870 hasBestOaLocation W21633028701 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConcept C154049752 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConcept C2775888743 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConcept C2776983577 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConceptScore W2163302870C127413603 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConceptScore W2163302870C141071460 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConceptScore W2163302870C142724271 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConceptScore W2163302870C154049752 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConceptScore W2163302870C168563851 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConceptScore W2163302870C17744445 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConceptScore W2163302870C199539241 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConceptScore W2163302870C2775888743 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConceptScore W2163302870C2775944032 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConceptScore W2163302870C2776983577 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConceptScore W2163302870C2779473830 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConceptScore W2163302870C42219234 @default.
• W2163302870 hasConceptScore W2163302870C535046627 @default.

• next