FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2163398049> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2163398049 endingPage "137" @default.
• W2163398049 startingPage "130" @default.
• W2163398049 abstract "El objetivo de este trabajo fue revisar las características de los métodos utilizados para valorar la estabilidad de la zona central del cuerpo (core stability), así como las características más importantes de los programas de ejercicios de estabilización del tronco. Los resultados de la revisión indican que métodos biomecánicos, como la aplicación controlada de cargas o descargas súbitas, el paradigma del asiento inestable y la modelación matemática, han permitido analizar el efecto de numerosos factores sobre la estabilidad del raquis. Por otro lado, los test de campo utilizados habitualmente para valorar la core stability (test de condición muscular, test de equilibrio corporal en apoyo monopodal, test de control postural del raquis lumbar y la pelvis, etc.) presentan limitaciones importantes, principalmente debido a la falta de estudios sobre la validez de estas medidas. Finalmente, existe una gran cantidad de información en relación con la eficacia y la seguridad de los ejercicios de estabilización, pero carecemos de información suficiente sobre otras características de la carga de entrenamiento. The aim of this study was to review both the characteristics of the tests used to assess core stability and the most important features of trunk stabilization exercise programs. The results of this review suggest that biomechanical methods such as sudden and controlled trunk loading and unloading, unstable sitting paradigm and mathematical modeling, have allowed us to analyze the effect of several factors on spine stability. In addition, field tests commonly used to assess core stability (muscle condition tests, single leg stance balance tests, postural control of lumbar spine and pelvis tests, etc.) have important limitations, mainly due to the absence of studies on the validity of these measurements. Finally, there is a lot of information regarding the effectiveness and safety of the stabilization exercises, but we lack enough information on other training load characteristics. O objetivo desse trabalho foi revisar as características dos métodos utilizados para avaliar a estabilidade da zona central do corpo («core estability»), assim como as características mais importantes dos programas de exercícios de estabilização do tronco. Os resultados da revisão indicam que métodos biomecânicos como a aplicação controlada de cargas ou descargas súbitas, o paradigma do assento estável e a modelação matemática, tem permitido analisar o efeito de numerosos fatores sobre a estabilidade da coluna. Por outro lado, os testes de campo utilizados habitualmente para avaliar a estabilidade do core (teste de condição muscular, teste de equilíbrio corporal em apoio monopodal, teste de controle postural da coluna lombar e da pelve, etc.) apresentam limitações importantes, principalmente devido a falta de estudos sobre a validade dessas medidas. Finalmente, existe uma grande quantidade de informação em relação à eficácia e à segurança dos exercícios de estabilização, mas carecemos de informação suficiente sobre outras características da carga de treinamento." @default.
• W2163398049 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2163398049 creator A5014953339 @default.
• W2163398049 creator A5016372738 @default.
• W2163398049 creator A5019132622 @default.
• W2163398049 creator A5022817562 @default.
• W2163398049 creator A5039924373 @default.
• W2163398049 creator A5081976015 @default.
• W2163398049 date "2015-09-01" @default.
• W2163398049 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2163398049 title "Core stability: evaluación y criterios para su entrenamiento" @default.
• W2163398049 cites W1966908544 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W1976993962 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W1979914684 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W1980075719 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W1980185735 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W1983142404 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W1983464789 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W1994099533 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W1998908181 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2002969212 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2006194540 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2018551331 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2037355160 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2044938238 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2046164469 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2047433722 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2048899244 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2049902272 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2050395969 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2061097947 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2061745726 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2062337969 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2065987281 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2070021585 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2070974433 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2071423475 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2072341371 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2079991884 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2081154906 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2082403327 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2083315777 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2087488692 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2090535526 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2100322080 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2101019400 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2112650079 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2122333119 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2124160649 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2124383603 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2134732152 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2137535936 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2141859251 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2148386843 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2150877482 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2154561298 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2159679513 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2160366982 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2164631174 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2164739109 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2167866202 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2331189042 @default.
• W2163398049 cites W2484673636 @default.
• W2163398049 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ramd.2014.02.005" @default.
• W2163398049 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2163398049 type Work @default.
• W2163398049 sameAs 2163398049 @default.
• W2163398049 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2163398049 countsByYear W21633980492017 @default.
• W2163398049 countsByYear W21633980492018 @default.
• W2163398049 countsByYear W21633980492019 @default.
• W2163398049 countsByYear W21633980492020 @default.
• W2163398049 countsByYear W21633980492021 @default.
• W2163398049 countsByYear W21633980492022 @default.
• W2163398049 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2163398049 hasAuthorship W2163398049A5014953339 @default.
• W2163398049 hasAuthorship W2163398049A5016372738 @default.
• W2163398049 hasAuthorship W2163398049A5019132622 @default.
• W2163398049 hasAuthorship W2163398049A5022817562 @default.
• W2163398049 hasAuthorship W2163398049A5039924373 @default.
• W2163398049 hasAuthorship W2163398049A5081976015 @default.
• W2163398049 hasBestOaLocation W21633980491 @default.
• W2163398049 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2163398049 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2163398049 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2163398049 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W2163398049 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2163398049 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2163398049 hasConcept C204664388 @default.
• W2163398049 hasConcept C2164484 @default.
• W2163398049 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2163398049 hasConceptScore W2163398049C120665830 @default.
• W2163398049 hasConceptScore W2163398049C121332964 @default.
• W2163398049 hasConceptScore W2163398049C138885662 @default.
• W2163398049 hasConceptScore W2163398049C15708023 @default.
• W2163398049 hasConceptScore W2163398049C15744967 @default.
• W2163398049 hasConceptScore W2163398049C1862650 @default.
• W2163398049 hasConceptScore W2163398049C204664388 @default.

• next