FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2164008034> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2164008034 endingPage "822" @default.
• W2164008034 startingPage "812" @default.
• W2164008034 abstract "Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomographic (CT) arthrography and 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography in the evaluation of rotator cuff lesions, with arthroscopic correlation. Materials and Methods This study was approved by the institutional ethical committee, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. CT and MR arthrographic images prospectively obtained in 56 consecutive patients, following the same arthrographic procedure, were independently evaluated by two radiologists. Arthroscopy, performed within 1 month of the imaging, was used as the reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity of CT and MR arthrography were compared by using the McNemar test. Interobserver and intertechnique agreement for detecting rotator cuff lesions were measured and compared with κ and Z statistics. The Bland-Altman method was used to determine interobserver and intertechnique agreement for measuring tendon tears. For grading fatty infiltration of rotator cuff muscles, κ and Z statistics were used. Results There was no statistically significant difference in sensitivity and specificity between CT arthrography and MR arthrography in depiction of rotator cuff lesions. The respective sensitivity and specificity of CT arthrography were 92% and 93%–97% for the supraspinatus, 100% and 77%–79% for the infraspinatus, 75%–88% and 85%–90% for the subscapularis, and 55%–65% and 100% for the biceps tendon. The respective sensitivity and specificity of MR arthrography were 96% and 83%–93% for the supraspinatus, 88%–100% and 81%–83% for the infraspinatus, 75%–88% and 90%–100% for the subscapularis, and 65%–85% and 100% for the biceps tendon. Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.744–0.964 for CT arthrography; κ = 0.641–0.893 for MR arthrography), and intertechnique agreement was almost perfect (κ > 0.819). CT and MR arthrography both yielded moderate interobserver and intertechnique agreement for measuring rotator cuff tears and grading muscle fatty infiltration. Conclusion Data suggest that CT and MR arthrography have similar diagnostic performance for the evaluation of rotator cuff tendon tears. © RSNA, 2012" @default.
• W2164008034 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2164008034 creator A5012038568 @default.
• W2164008034 creator A5038994606 @default.
• W2164008034 creator A5039171922 @default.
• W2164008034 creator A5049647868 @default.
• W2164008034 creator A5050755647 @default.
• W2164008034 creator A5077482056 @default.
• W2164008034 date "2012-09-01" @default.
• W2164008034 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2164008034 title "Evaluation of Rotator Cuff Tendon Tears: Comparison of Multidetector CT Arthrography and 1.5-T MR Arthrography" @default.
• W2164008034 cites W1972289870 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W1977763663 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W1981881551 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W1993515038 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W1998076424 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2006244369 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2012409676 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2015105701 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2015795623 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2025800542 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2033503557 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2042190224 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2085643109 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2098509484 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2098953291 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2102721064 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2117794495 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2127807623 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2142681601 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2157302567 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2157988516 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2158644066 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2163919580 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2164777277 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2164921568 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W2169776207 @default.
• W2164008034 cites W4297832561 @default.
• W2164008034 doi "https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12112062" @default.
• W2164008034 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22919041" @default.
• W2164008034 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2164008034 type Work @default.
• W2164008034 sameAs 2164008034 @default.
• W2164008034 citedByCount "53" @default.
• W2164008034 countsByYear W21640080342013 @default.
• W2164008034 countsByYear W21640080342014 @default.
• W2164008034 countsByYear W21640080342015 @default.
• W2164008034 countsByYear W21640080342016 @default.
• W2164008034 countsByYear W21640080342017 @default.
• W2164008034 countsByYear W21640080342018 @default.
• W2164008034 countsByYear W21640080342019 @default.
• W2164008034 countsByYear W21640080342020 @default.
• W2164008034 countsByYear W21640080342021 @default.
• W2164008034 countsByYear W21640080342022 @default.
• W2164008034 countsByYear W21640080342023 @default.
• W2164008034 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2164008034 hasAuthorship W2164008034A5012038568 @default.
• W2164008034 hasAuthorship W2164008034A5038994606 @default.
• W2164008034 hasAuthorship W2164008034A5039171922 @default.
• W2164008034 hasAuthorship W2164008034A5049647868 @default.
• W2164008034 hasAuthorship W2164008034A5050755647 @default.
• W2164008034 hasAuthorship W2164008034A5077482056 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConcept C186282968 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConcept C2776511800 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConcept C2778275304 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConcept C2779162959 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConcept C2780105995 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConceptScore W2164008034C105795698 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConceptScore W2164008034C126838900 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConceptScore W2164008034C141071460 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConceptScore W2164008034C143409427 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConceptScore W2164008034C186282968 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConceptScore W2164008034C2776511800 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConceptScore W2164008034C2778275304 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConceptScore W2164008034C2779162959 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConceptScore W2164008034C2780105995 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConceptScore W2164008034C2989005 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConceptScore W2164008034C33923547 @default.
• W2164008034 hasConceptScore W2164008034C71924100 @default.
• W2164008034 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2164008034 hasLocation W21640080341 @default.
• W2164008034 hasLocation W21640080342 @default.
• W2164008034 hasOpenAccess W2164008034 @default.
• W2164008034 hasPrimaryLocation W21640080341 @default.
• W2164008034 hasRelatedWork W2008460476 @default.
• W2164008034 hasRelatedWork W2020873118 @default.
• W2164008034 hasRelatedWork W2055566411 @default.
• W2164008034 hasRelatedWork W2062944881 @default.
• W2164008034 hasRelatedWork W2136378192 @default.
• W2164008034 hasRelatedWork W2143951763 @default.
• W2164008034 hasRelatedWork W2145431797 @default.

• next