FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2164777381> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2164777381 endingPage "547" @default.
• W2164777381 startingPage "530" @default.
• W2164777381 abstract "Purpose – Whilst the real estate development appraisal practices of large national and international real estate companies are well understood, relatively little is known about how development appraisals are conducted by indigenous appraisers and valuers in developing countries. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how development appraisal is conducted in Brazil, compared to the UK, focusing primarily on the methods employed by small- and medium-sized real estate practices and their appraisers to appraise the viability of commercial real estate developments in the State of Sao Paulo. Design/methodology/approach – The study employs a two phase Delphi Method to capture and analyse empirical data from small- and medium-sized real estate appraisers in Brazil. Using the long established and relatively transparent UK Residual Method of development appraisal as a template against which to compare Brazilian appraisal methods, guidance and practice. To understand how indigenous development appraisers operate the Brazilian development appraisal methods, the research was conducted in Portuguese by a bi-lingual real estate expert who was familiar with both UK and Brazilian practice. Findings – The research establishes that appraisers working for small- and medium -sized real estate practices in Brazil rarely use the Residual Method. Instead, they employ a range of methods, the choice of which is heavily influenced by the availability of comparable market data, with Direct Comparison of market data and the Capitalisation of Income being the methods of choice. Appraisers rarely employ the Residual Method as the principal development appraisal technique, using instead the Comparative Method and Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis. Land prices are usually agreed or already known and developer’s profit is usually determined using DCF analysis and is highly sensitive to fluctuations in construction costs. Research limitations/implications – The research engaged with a small number of appraisers and valuers in small- and medium-sized practices in the State of Sao Paulo using a two-phase Delphi Method. The long established UK Residual Method of development appraisal was used as a template against which to compare practice in Sao Paulo State. There is potential therefore to replicate the research in other Brazilian States and transfer the methodology to other developing countries. Practical implications – In Brazil, when development land in urban areas is acquired on the basis of plot exchange, land is often sold at less than market value and the original landowner retains an equity stake in the development and shares in the development overage. The practice of “ permuta física ”, giving landowners the freehold of part of the development, or “ permuta financeira ”, whereby the landowner receives an enhanced land price, indexed against development value, is of potential relevance to the UK and other developed countries that need help in urban unlocking land markets. Originality/value – The research is a unique comparative study of development appraisal methods employed by small- and medium-sized practices in Brazil. It contributes to the limited literature that has so far been published in English on Brazilian development appraisal methods and reveals the similarities and differences with the Residual Method of development appraisal that is widely used in the UK and other developed countries." @default.
• W2164777381 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2164777381 creator A5004285990 @default.
• W2164777381 creator A5023945059 @default.
• W2164777381 date "2015-09-07" @default.
• W2164777381 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2164777381 title "An investigation of development appraisal methods employed by valuers and appraisers in small and medium sized practices in Brazil" @default.
• W2164777381 cites W1519961568 @default.
• W2164777381 cites W1555149333 @default.
• W2164777381 cites W1993248769 @default.
• W2164777381 cites W2009008511 @default.
• W2164777381 cites W2069220491 @default.
• W2164777381 cites W2070032729 @default.
• W2164777381 cites W2070172019 @default.
• W2164777381 cites W2090740742 @default.
• W2164777381 cites W2125316516 @default.
• W2164777381 cites W2485126600 @default.
• W2164777381 cites W3121550279 @default.
• W2164777381 cites W4205381561 @default.
• W2164777381 cites W4205848502 @default.
• W2164777381 cites W4231657455 @default.
• W2164777381 cites W4237029240 @default.
• W2164777381 cites W4240268283 @default.
• W2164777381 cites W4250031451 @default.
• W2164777381 cites W4299820775 @default.
• W2164777381 cites W4301874450 @default.
• W2164777381 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/jpif-03-2015-0019" @default.
• W2164777381 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2164777381 type Work @default.
• W2164777381 sameAs 2164777381 @default.
• W2164777381 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2164777381 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2164777381 hasAuthorship W2164777381A5004285990 @default.
• W2164777381 hasAuthorship W2164777381A5023945059 @default.
• W2164777381 hasBestOaLocation W21647773812 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConcept C205664371 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConcept C2778920669 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConcept C2780495726 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConcept C502083482 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConcept C60641444 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConcept C82279013 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConceptScore W2164777381C10138342 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConceptScore W2164777381C105795698 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConceptScore W2164777381C121955636 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConceptScore W2164777381C144133560 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConceptScore W2164777381C162118730 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConceptScore W2164777381C205664371 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConceptScore W2164777381C2778920669 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConceptScore W2164777381C2780495726 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConceptScore W2164777381C33923547 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConceptScore W2164777381C502083482 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConceptScore W2164777381C60641444 @default.
• W2164777381 hasConceptScore W2164777381C82279013 @default.
• W2164777381 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2164777381 hasLocation W21647773811 @default.
• W2164777381 hasLocation W21647773812 @default.
• W2164777381 hasOpenAccess W2164777381 @default.
• W2164777381 hasPrimaryLocation W21647773811 @default.
• W2164777381 hasRelatedWork W159091991 @default.
• W2164777381 hasRelatedWork W1864963004 @default.
• W2164777381 hasRelatedWork W2124273482 @default.
• W2164777381 hasRelatedWork W2217300606 @default.
• W2164777381 hasRelatedWork W2377013952 @default.
• W2164777381 hasRelatedWork W3121211061 @default.
• W2164777381 hasRelatedWork W3123757520 @default.
• W2164777381 hasRelatedWork W4200309523 @default.
• W2164777381 hasRelatedWork W624204849 @default.
• W2164777381 hasRelatedWork W3125708154 @default.
• W2164777381 hasVolume "33" @default.
• W2164777381 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2164777381 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2164777381 magId "2164777381" @default.
• W2164777381 workType "article" @default.