FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2165166892> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2165166892 endingPage "166" @default.
• W2165166892 startingPage "161" @default.
• W2165166892 abstract "Introduction Evaluation of poorly performing physicians is a worldwide concern for licensing bodies. The Collège des Médecins du Québec currently assesses the clinical competence of physicians previously identified with potential clinical competence difficulties through a day-long procedure called the Structured Oral Interview (SOI). Two peer physicians produce a qualitative report. In view of remediation activities and the potential for legal consequences, more information on the clinical reasoning process (CRP) and quantitative data on the quality of that process is needed. This study examines the Script Concordance Test (SCT), a tool that provides a standardized and objective measure of a specific dimension of CRP, clinical data interpretation (CDI), to determine whether it could be useful in that endeavor. Methods Over a 2-year period, 20 family physicians took, in addition to the SOI, a 1-hour paper-and-pencil SCT. Three evaluators, blind as to the purpose of the experiment, retrospectively reviewed SOI reports and were asked to estimate clinical reasoning quality. Subjects were classified into 2 groups (below and above median of the score distribution) for the 2 assessment methods. Agreement between classifications is estimated with the use of the Kappa coefficient. Results Intraclass correlation for SOI was 0.89. Cronbach alpha coefficient for the SCT was 0.90. Agreement between methods was found for 13 participants (Kappa: 0.30, P = 0.18), but 7 out of 20 participants were classified differently in both methods. All participants but 1 had SCT scores below 2 SD of panel mean, thus indicating serious deficiencies in CDI. Discussion The finding that the majority of the referred group did so poorly on CDI tasks has great interest for assessment as well as for remediation. In remediation of prescribing skills, adding SCT to SOI is useful for assessment of cognitive reasoning in poorly performing physicians. The structured oral interview should be improved with more precise reporting by those who assess the clinical reasoning process of examinees, and caution is recommended in interpreting SCT scores; they reflect only a part of the reasoning process." @default.
• W2165166892 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2165166892 creator A5008305711 @default.
• W2165166892 creator A5020871090 @default.
• W2165166892 creator A5022587340 @default.
• W2165166892 creator A5033433777 @default.
• W2165166892 creator A5076775426 @default.
• W2165166892 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W2165166892 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2165166892 title "Poorly performing physicians: Does the script concordance test detect bad clinical reasoning? *" @default.
• W2165166892 cites W1974438238 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W1982586701 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2000049930 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2002230378 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2007329364 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2012306794 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2014917954 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2049645915 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2057470321 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2058166804 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2080354068 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2080818078 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2086245315 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2093844513 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2105460192 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2118786685 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2122612736 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2124349702 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2157202661 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2164610426 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W2169807821 @default.
• W2165166892 cites W4205258417 @default.
• W2165166892 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.20076" @default.
• W2165166892 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20872770" @default.
• W2165166892 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2165166892 type Work @default.
• W2165166892 sameAs 2165166892 @default.
• W2165166892 citedByCount "29" @default.
• W2165166892 countsByYear W21651668922012 @default.
• W2165166892 countsByYear W21651668922013 @default.
• W2165166892 countsByYear W21651668922015 @default.
• W2165166892 countsByYear W21651668922016 @default.
• W2165166892 countsByYear W21651668922017 @default.
• W2165166892 countsByYear W21651668922018 @default.
• W2165166892 countsByYear W21651668922020 @default.
• W2165166892 countsByYear W21651668922021 @default.
• W2165166892 countsByYear W21651668922022 @default.
• W2165166892 countsByYear W21651668922023 @default.
• W2165166892 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2165166892 hasAuthorship W2165166892A5008305711 @default.
• W2165166892 hasAuthorship W2165166892A5020871090 @default.
• W2165166892 hasAuthorship W2165166892A5022587340 @default.
• W2165166892 hasAuthorship W2165166892A5033433777 @default.
• W2165166892 hasAuthorship W2165166892A5076775426 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConcept C100521375 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConcept C106906290 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConcept C160798450 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConcept C163864269 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConcept C2778724333 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConceptScore W2165166892C100521375 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConceptScore W2165166892C104709138 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConceptScore W2165166892C105795698 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConceptScore W2165166892C106906290 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConceptScore W2165166892C126322002 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConceptScore W2165166892C138885662 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConceptScore W2165166892C15744967 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConceptScore W2165166892C160798450 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConceptScore W2165166892C163864269 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConceptScore W2165166892C171606756 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConceptScore W2165166892C19527891 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConceptScore W2165166892C2778724333 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConceptScore W2165166892C33923547 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConceptScore W2165166892C41895202 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConceptScore W2165166892C512399662 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConceptScore W2165166892C70410870 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConceptScore W2165166892C71924100 @default.
• W2165166892 hasConceptScore W2165166892C77805123 @default.
• W2165166892 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2165166892 hasLocation W21651668921 @default.
• W2165166892 hasLocation W21651668922 @default.
• W2165166892 hasOpenAccess W2165166892 @default.
• W2165166892 hasPrimaryLocation W21651668921 @default.
• W2165166892 hasRelatedWork W2439406891 @default.
• W2165166892 hasRelatedWork W2930438607 @default.
• W2165166892 hasRelatedWork W2991044756 @default.

• next