FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2165599055> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2165599055 abstract "Background Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is the most frequent form of oral ulceration, characterised by recurrent oral mucosal ulceration in an otherwise healthy individual. At its worst RAS can cause significant difficulties in eating and drinking. Treatment is primarily aimed at pain relief and the promotion of healing to reduce the duration of the disease or reduce the rate of recurrence. A variety of topical and systemic therapies have been utilised. Objectives To determine the clinical effect of systemic interventions in the reduction of pain associated with RAS, a reduction in episode duration or frequency. Search methods We undertook electronic searches of: Cochrane Oral Health Group and PaPaS Trials Registers (to 6 June 2012); CENTRAL via The Cochrane Library (to Issue 4, 2012); MEDLINE via OVID (1950 to 6 June 2012); EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 6 June 2012); CINAHL via EBSCO (1980 to 6 June 2012); and AMED via PubMed (1950 to 6 June 2012). We searched reference lists from relevant articles and contacted the authors of eligible trials to identify further trials and obtain additional information. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which the primary outcome measures assess a reduction of pain associated with RAS, a reduction in episode duration or a reduction in episode frequency. Trials were not restricted by outcome alone. We also included RCTs of a cross‐over design. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently extracted data in duplicate. We contacted trial authors for details of randomisation, blindness and withdrawals. We carried out risk of bias assessment on six domains. We followed The Cochrane Collaboration statistical guidelines and risk ratio (RR) values were to be calculated using fixed‐effect models (if two or three trials in each meta‐analysis) or random‐effects models (if four or more trials in each meta‐analysis). Main results A total of 25 trials were included, 22 of which were placebo controlled and eight made head‐to‐head comparisons (five trials had more than two treatment arms). Twenty‐one different interventions were assessed. The interventions were grouped into two categories: immunomodulatory/anti‐inflammatory and uncertain. Only one study was assessed as being at low risk of bias. There was insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of any intervention. Authors' conclusions No single treatment was found to be effective and therefore the results remain inconclusive in regard to the best systemic intervention for RAS. This is likely to reflect the poor methodological rigour of trials, and lack of studies for certain drugs, rather than the true effect of the intervention. It is also recognised that in clinical practice, individual drugs appear to work for individual patients and so the interventions are likely to be complex in nature. In addition, it is acknowledged that systemic interventions are often reserved for those patients who have been unresponsive to topical treatments, and therefore may represent a select group of patients." @default.
• W2165599055 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2165599055 creator A5018295349 @default.
• W2165599055 creator A5027424272 @default.
• W2165599055 creator A5041128185 @default.
• W2165599055 creator A5050510595 @default.
• W2165599055 creator A5061338386 @default.
• W2165599055 creator A5066881948 @default.
• W2165599055 creator A5070245802 @default.
• W2165599055 creator A5082679187 @default.
• W2165599055 creator A5091413676 @default.
• W2165599055 date "2012-09-12" @default.
• W2165599055 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2165599055 title "Systemic interventions for recurrent aphthous stomatitis (mouth ulcers)" @default.
• W2165599055 cites W1502338171 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W1521038532 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W1564094715 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W1815003240 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W1918337421 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W1964508636 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W1972358029 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W1973121981 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W1973340677 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W1979617469 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W1980877893 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W1991164516 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W1991852669 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W1997622109 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W1998484150 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2006409278 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2007184395 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2018553148 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2027362792 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2036677655 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2043044489 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2047795753 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2054707502 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2059052846 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2059226888 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2066565125 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2074606693 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2075967530 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2077016437 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2080339567 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2086849330 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2088166452 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2096652654 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2099057038 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2126177579 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2129285020 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2131637029 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2133988529 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2135229583 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2136977168 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2141020997 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2146495510 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2154021093 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2166339459 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W2171112208 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W4233005124 @default.
• W2165599055 cites W71685682 @default.
• W2165599055 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd005411.pub2" @default.
• W2165599055 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22972085" @default.
• W2165599055 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2165599055 type Work @default.
• W2165599055 sameAs 2165599055 @default.
• W2165599055 citedByCount "46" @default.
• W2165599055 countsByYear W21655990552013 @default.
• W2165599055 countsByYear W21655990552014 @default.
• W2165599055 countsByYear W21655990552015 @default.
• W2165599055 countsByYear W21655990552016 @default.
• W2165599055 countsByYear W21655990552017 @default.
• W2165599055 countsByYear W21655990552018 @default.
• W2165599055 countsByYear W21655990552019 @default.
• W2165599055 countsByYear W21655990552020 @default.
• W2165599055 countsByYear W21655990552021 @default.
• W2165599055 countsByYear W21655990552022 @default.
• W2165599055 countsByYear W21655990552023 @default.
• W2165599055 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2165599055 hasAuthorship W2165599055A5018295349 @default.
• W2165599055 hasAuthorship W2165599055A5027424272 @default.
• W2165599055 hasAuthorship W2165599055A5041128185 @default.
• W2165599055 hasAuthorship W2165599055A5050510595 @default.
• W2165599055 hasAuthorship W2165599055A5061338386 @default.
• W2165599055 hasAuthorship W2165599055A5066881948 @default.
• W2165599055 hasAuthorship W2165599055A5070245802 @default.
• W2165599055 hasAuthorship W2165599055A5082679187 @default.
• W2165599055 hasAuthorship W2165599055A5091413676 @default.
• W2165599055 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2165599055 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2165599055 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2165599055 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2165599055 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2165599055 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2165599055 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2165599055 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
• W2165599055 hasConcept C2779051857 @default.
• W2165599055 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2165599055 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W2165599055 hasConcept C3018459608 @default.

• next