FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2165925172> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2165925172 endingPage "548" @default.
• W2165925172 startingPage "543" @default.
• W2165925172 abstract "OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of a new microwave thermotherapy for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), the ProstaLund Feedback Treatment (PLFT®, ProstaLund Operations AB, Lund, Sweden) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in a clinical trial to their effectiveness in clinical practice over 1 year, to estimate their cost over 1 year, and to evaluate the cost of re‐interventions over a longer period (2–3 years). PATIENTS AND METHODS In a large randomized international 1‐year clinical trial PLFT was as effective as TURP in improving symptoms of BPH and urinary flow. Because PLFT is an outpatient procedure it was less costly than TURP. However, the cost‐effectiveness of the new procedure depends on its long‐term effectiveness in clinical practice. All 146 patients in the randomized clinical trial were included in the present analysis. The outcome was based on the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and the bother score, and costs were estimated from treatment‐related adverse events and hospitalization. To validate the estimates based on the clinical trial 1‐year data on effectiveness and complete resource use in clinical practice were collected in a retrospective observational study from hospital charts and patient questionnaires of 88 patients who had undergone either TURP or PLFT. To assess the number of re‐interventions after TURP after the first year information was obtained from hospital and surgical procedure data in the Swedish inpatient registry. The 3‐year data for a total of 52 010 patients who had an index hospitalization for TURP between 1990 and 1995 were available for the analysis. The estimate of long‐term consequences of PLFT was based on complication and re‐intervention data for 87 patients who had undergone PLFT between 1997 and 1999. RESULTS The mean 1‐year costs in the clinical trial were estimated at €1763 for PLFT and €3209 for TURP. When all treatment‐related resource use in clinical practice for 88 patients was included the costs were estimated at €1924 and €3264 for PLFT and TURP, respectively. The IPSS and bother scores were not significantly different between the groups in both datasets. Using the registry data the cost of TURP including re‐interventions (TURP and bladder neck incisions) was estimated at €3159 over 2 years and €3185 over 3 years; the respective costs for PLFT were €2121 and at €2151. CONCLUSIONS In the 1‐year clinical trial PLFT was as effective but less costly than TURP, but long‐term data are still lacking. However, the preliminary analysis over 3 years indicates that the average cost of the procedure remains lower than the total cost of TURP for the same period." @default.
• W2165925172 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2165925172 creator A5006883959 @default.
• W2165925172 creator A5045027748 @default.
• W2165925172 creator A5074586285 @default.
• W2165925172 date "2004-02-20" @default.
• W2165925172 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2165925172 title "The cost of feedback microwave thermotherapy compared with transurethral resection of the prostate for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia" @default.
• W2165925172 cites W1497769826 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W1979512002 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W1980822861 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W1995525708 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W2015464365 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W2021654798 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W2026187049 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W2042248174 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W2062241953 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W2063280565 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W2067641122 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W2069095897 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W2074145675 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W2074500301 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W2089565371 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W2108725259 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W2113105365 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W2114364930 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W2135320683 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W2145396879 @default.
• W2165925172 cites W2473786944 @default.
• W2165925172 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2003.04689.x" @default.
• W2165925172 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15008726" @default.
• W2165925172 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2165925172 type Work @default.
• W2165925172 sameAs 2165925172 @default.
• W2165925172 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W2165925172 countsByYear W21659251722012 @default.
• W2165925172 countsByYear W21659251722014 @default.
• W2165925172 countsByYear W21659251722021 @default.
• W2165925172 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2165925172 hasAuthorship W2165925172A5006883959 @default.
• W2165925172 hasAuthorship W2165925172A5045027748 @default.
• W2165925172 hasAuthorship W2165925172A5074586285 @default.
• W2165925172 hasBestOaLocation W21659251722 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConcept C2776235491 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConcept C2776547966 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConcept C2779478474 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConcept C2780768273 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConceptScore W2165925172C112930515 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConceptScore W2165925172C118552586 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConceptScore W2165925172C121608353 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConceptScore W2165925172C126322002 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConceptScore W2165925172C141071460 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConceptScore W2165925172C168563851 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConceptScore W2165925172C23131810 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConceptScore W2165925172C27415008 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConceptScore W2165925172C2776235491 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConceptScore W2165925172C2776547966 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConceptScore W2165925172C2779478474 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConceptScore W2165925172C2780768273 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConceptScore W2165925172C3019080777 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConceptScore W2165925172C535046627 @default.
• W2165925172 hasConceptScore W2165925172C71924100 @default.
• W2165925172 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2165925172 hasLocation W21659251721 @default.
• W2165925172 hasLocation W21659251722 @default.
• W2165925172 hasLocation W21659251723 @default.
• W2165925172 hasLocation W21659251724 @default.
• W2165925172 hasOpenAccess W2165925172 @default.
• W2165925172 hasPrimaryLocation W21659251721 @default.
• W2165925172 hasRelatedWork W1996510059 @default.
• W2165925172 hasRelatedWork W2003307747 @default.
• W2165925172 hasRelatedWork W2079936258 @default.
• W2165925172 hasRelatedWork W2088242573 @default.
• W2165925172 hasRelatedWork W2383305874 @default.
• W2165925172 hasRelatedWork W2418998327 @default.
• W2165925172 hasRelatedWork W2790650296 @default.
• W2165925172 hasRelatedWork W4220891254 @default.
• W2165925172 hasRelatedWork W4239893575 @default.
• W2165925172 hasRelatedWork W1953857078 @default.
• W2165925172 hasVolume "93" @default.
• W2165925172 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2165925172 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2165925172 magId "2165925172" @default.
• W2165925172 workType "article" @default.