FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2165971332> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2165971332 abstract "Several instruments have been developed to assess psychosocial workload. We compared two of these instruments, the Effort-Reward Imbalance (ERI) model and the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) with regard to congruent validity and internal validity. This analysis is based on a population-based sample of the baseline examination of 2,783 employees from the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS). About half of the participants completed the ERI questionnaire (n = 1,342), the other half completed the COPSOQ (n = 1,441). First, the two samples were compared and descriptive analyses were carried out calculating mean values for both instruments in general, then separately for age, gender and main occupational groups. Second, we analyzed the relationship between ERI and COPSOQ scales on the workplace situation and on the workplace outcomes: job satisfaction, general health, burnout, satisfaction with life, by applying stepwise logistic regression analysis. For the majority of occupations, high effort as reflected by the ERI corresponded with high demands as reflected by the COPSOQ. Comparably, high reward (according to ERI) yielded a good agreement with high “influence and development” (according to COPSOQ). However, we could also find differences between ERI and COPSOQ concerning the intensity of psychosocial workload in some occupations (e.g., physicians/pharmacists or warehouse managers/warehousemen/transport workers). These differences point to differing theoretical concepts of ERI and COPSOQ. When the ability of ERI and COPSOQ was examined to determine the associations with health and work outcomes, burnout could be better predicted by the COPSOQ; this might be due to the fact that COPSOQ comprises the constructs “work-privacy conflict” and “emotional demand”, which are closely related to burnout. However, methodological differences between these instruments limit their direct comparability. The ERI and COPSOQ instrument yielded similar results for most occupational groups. The slightly stronger association between psychosocial workload as assessed by COPSOQ and burnout might be explained by its broader approach. The ability of the ERI and COPSOQ instrument to reflect relevant risk factors for clinically manifest disorders (e.g., coronary heart disease) will be derived from subsequent prospective analyses of the GHS with the follow-up data." @default.
• W2165971332 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2165971332 creator A5004589866 @default.
• W2165971332 creator A5010491259 @default.
• W2165971332 creator A5011875990 @default.
• W2165971332 creator A5019924642 @default.
• W2165971332 creator A5022358930 @default.
• W2165971332 creator A5022452231 @default.
• W2165971332 creator A5040661757 @default.
• W2165971332 creator A5050080914 @default.
• W2165971332 creator A5051394108 @default.
• W2165971332 creator A5070965755 @default.
• W2165971332 creator A5083180282 @default.
• W2165971332 date "2013-06-04" @default.
• W2165971332 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2165971332 title "The Gutenberg Health Study: measuring psychosocial factors at work and predicting health and work-related outcomes with the ERI and the COPSOQ questionnaire" @default.
• W2165971332 cites W1942319221 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W1976211709 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W1979652774 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W1991590139 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W1995855651 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W2011450835 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W2027575839 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W2047319975 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W2056554058 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W2062072901 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W2062456575 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W2101373285 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W2102463240 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W2104018747 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W2107538614 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W2119483110 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W2145485934 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W2156058951 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W4243321329 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W4243426639 @default.
• W2165971332 cites W9727340 @default.
• W2165971332 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-538" @default.
• W2165971332 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3707767" @default.
• W2165971332 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23734632" @default.
• W2165971332 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2165971332 type Work @default.
• W2165971332 sameAs 2165971332 @default.
• W2165971332 citedByCount "55" @default.
• W2165971332 countsByYear W21659713322014 @default.
• W2165971332 countsByYear W21659713322015 @default.
• W2165971332 countsByYear W21659713322016 @default.
• W2165971332 countsByYear W21659713322017 @default.
• W2165971332 countsByYear W21659713322018 @default.
• W2165971332 countsByYear W21659713322019 @default.
• W2165971332 countsByYear W21659713322020 @default.
• W2165971332 countsByYear W21659713322021 @default.
• W2165971332 countsByYear W21659713322022 @default.
• W2165971332 countsByYear W21659713322023 @default.
• W2165971332 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2165971332 hasAuthorship W2165971332A5004589866 @default.
• W2165971332 hasAuthorship W2165971332A5010491259 @default.
• W2165971332 hasAuthorship W2165971332A5011875990 @default.
• W2165971332 hasAuthorship W2165971332A5019924642 @default.
• W2165971332 hasAuthorship W2165971332A5022358930 @default.
• W2165971332 hasAuthorship W2165971332A5022452231 @default.
• W2165971332 hasAuthorship W2165971332A5040661757 @default.
• W2165971332 hasAuthorship W2165971332A5050080914 @default.
• W2165971332 hasAuthorship W2165971332A5051394108 @default.
• W2165971332 hasAuthorship W2165971332A5070965755 @default.
• W2165971332 hasAuthorship W2165971332A5083180282 @default.
• W2165971332 hasBestOaLocation W21659713321 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConcept C143916079 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConcept C150966472 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConcept C2718322 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConcept C2778476105 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConceptScore W2165971332C111919701 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConceptScore W2165971332C118552586 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConceptScore W2165971332C126322002 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConceptScore W2165971332C143916079 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConceptScore W2165971332C150966472 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConceptScore W2165971332C151956035 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConceptScore W2165971332C15744967 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConceptScore W2165971332C2718322 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConceptScore W2165971332C2778476105 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConceptScore W2165971332C2908647359 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConceptScore W2165971332C41008148 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConceptScore W2165971332C70410870 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConceptScore W2165971332C71924100 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConceptScore W2165971332C75630572 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConceptScore W2165971332C77805123 @default.
• W2165971332 hasConceptScore W2165971332C99454951 @default.
• W2165971332 hasIssue "1" @default.

• next