FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2166282011> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2166282011 endingPage "145" @default.
• W2166282011 startingPage "124" @default.
• W2166282011 abstract "Health professionals are increasingly expected to identify their own learning needs through a process of ongoing self-assessment. Self-assessment is integral to many appraisal systems and has been espoused as an important aspect of personal professional behaviour by several regulatory bodies and those developing learning outcomes for clinical students. In this review we considered the evidence base on self-assessment since Gordon's comprehensive review in 1991. The overall aim of the present review was to determine whether specific methods of self-assessment lead to change in learning behaviour or clinical practice. Specific objectives sought evidence for effectiveness of self-assessment interventions to: a. improve perception of learning needs; b. promote change in learning activity; c. improve clinical practice; d. improve patient outcomes.The methods for this review were developed and refined in a series of workshops with input from an expert BEME systematic reviewer, and followed BEME guidance. Databases searched included Medline, CINAHL, BNI, Embase, EBM Collection, Psychlit, HMIC, ERIC, BEI, TIMElit and RDRB. Papers addressing self-assessment in all professions in clinical practice were included, covering under- and post-graduate education, with outcomes classified using an extended version of Kirkpatrick's hierarchy. In addition we included outcome measures of accuracy of self-assessment and factors influencing it. 5,798 papers were retrieved, 194 abstracts were identified as potentially relevant and 103 papers coded independently by pairs using an electronic coding sheet adapted from the standard BEME form. This total included 12 papers identified by hand-searches, grey literature, cited references and updating. The identification of a further 12 papers during the writing-up process resulted in a total of 77 papers for final analysis.Although a large number of papers resulted from our original search only a small proportion of these were of sufficient academic rigour to be included in our review. The majority of these focused on judging the accuracy of self-assessment against some external standard, which raises questions about assumed reliability and validity of this 'gold standard'. No papers were found which satisfied Kirkpatrick's hierarchy above level 2, or which looked at the association between self-assessment and resulting changes in either clinical practice or patient outcomes. Thus our review was largely unable to answer the specific research questions and provide a solid evidence base for effective self-assessment. Despite this, there was some evidence that the accuracy of self-assessment can be enhanced by feedback, particularly video and verbal, and by providing explicit assessment criteria and benchmarking guidance. There was also some evidence that the least competent are also the least able to self-assess accurately. Our review recommends that these areas merit future systematic research to further our understanding of self-assessment.As in other BEME reviews, the methodological issues emerging from this review indicate a need for more rigorous study designs. In addition, it highlights the need to consider the potential for combining qualitative and quantitative data to further our understanding of how self-assessment can improve learning and professional clinical practice." @default.
• W2166282011 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2166282011 creator A5027607877 @default.
• W2166282011 creator A5031940643 @default.
• W2166282011 creator A5040724165 @default.
• W2166282011 creator A5046461357 @default.
• W2166282011 creator A5058305989 @default.
• W2166282011 creator A5063348963 @default.
• W2166282011 creator A5073370555 @default.
• W2166282011 date "2008-01-01" @default.
• W2166282011 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W2166282011 title "The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10" @default.
• W2166282011 cites W130090570 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1561476688 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1573990476 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1595988117 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1963646845 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1964981507 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1965574830 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1968485804 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1969073627 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1971530238 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1973480107 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1975247671 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1975419157 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1977969290 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1978974820 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1982210139 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1982230971 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1983779029 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1984142978 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1985369133 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1989719844 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W1993333885 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2003613238 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2003821078 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2008165711 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2008821325 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2009939882 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2010284328 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2012108241 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2017592954 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2019036948 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2033557575 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2041487528 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2043518720 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2044793259 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2046139116 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2047765444 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2049747787 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2056956675 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2058401828 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2058945027 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2059602965 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2064944378 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2065027146 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2065128883 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2066125474 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2066166444 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2068067094 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2068757607 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2071605306 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2072762786 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2075129511 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2075717546 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2078461091 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2084057771 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2084916150 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2087066504 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2092153032 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2095973156 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2100492091 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2101410651 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2119763856 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2120386903 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2123346247 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2128555884 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2128771384 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2137380316 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2141284179 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2144742466 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2146006411 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2151575069 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2155905022 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2158021615 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2162457147 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2166252343 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2167461288 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2472146810 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W2617502216 @default.
• W2166282011 cites W4292808503 @default.
• W2166282011 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701881699" @default.
• W2166282011 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18464136" @default.
• W2166282011 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2166282011 type Work @default.
• W2166282011 sameAs 2166282011 @default.
• W2166282011 citedByCount "288" @default.
• W2166282011 countsByYear W21662820112012 @default.

• next