FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2166284866> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2166284866 endingPage "1686" @default.
• W2166284866 startingPage "1679" @default.
• W2166284866 abstract "Given similar socio-demographic profiles and costs of healthcare, why has Australia been significantly more successful than the UK in reducing the assisted reproductive technology (ART) multiple birth rate?The Australian model of supportive public ART funding, permissive clinical guidelines and an absence of published clinic league tables has enabled Australian fertility specialists to act collectively to achieve rapid and widespread adoption of single embryo transfer (SET).There are striking differences in ART utilization and clinical practice between Australia and the UK. The ART multiple birth rate in Australia is <8% compared with slightly <20% in the UK. The role played by public funding, clinical guidelines, league tables and educational campaigns deserves further evaluation.Parallel time-series analysis was performed on ART treatment and outcome data sourced from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) ART Registry and the Australian and New Zealand Assisted Reproduction Database (ANZARD). Funding arrangements, clinical practice guidelines and key professional and public education campaigns were mapped to trends in clinical practice and ART treatment outcomes between 2001 and 2010.A total of 425 360 and 422 003 autologous treatment cycles undertaken between 2001 and 2010 in the UK and Australia were analysed.From 2001 to 2010, the most striking difference in clinical practice was the increase in SET cycles in Australia from 21 to 70% of cycles, compared with an increase from 8.4 to 31% in the UK. In 2004-2005, both countries introduced clinical guidelines encouraging safe embryo practices, however, Australia has a history of supportive funding for ART, while the National Health Service has a more restrictive and fragmented approach. While clinical guidelines and education campaigns have an important role to play, funding remains a key element in the promotion of SET.This is a descriptive population study and therefore quantifying the independent effect of differential levels of public funding was not possible.With demand for ART continuing to increase worldwide, it is imperative that we remove barriers that impede safe embryo transfer practices. This analysis highlights the importance of supportive public funding in achieving this goal." @default.
• W2166284866 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2166284866 creator A5006343045 @default.
• W2166284866 creator A5013850174 @default.
• W2166284866 creator A5025820202 @default.
• W2166284866 creator A5057260196 @default.
• W2166284866 creator A5070020081 @default.
• W2166284866 creator A5071983599 @default.
• W2166284866 creator A5090558662 @default.
• W2166284866 date "2013-04-02" @default.
• W2166284866 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2166284866 title "What can we learn from a decade of promoting safe embryo transfer practices? A comparative analysis of policies and outcomes in the UK and Australia, 2001-2010" @default.
• W2166284866 cites W1967935846 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W1968972625 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W1993768029 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W2003670543 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W2007848905 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W2017123860 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W2020364975 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W2046821347 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W2060961046 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W2084742322 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W2086820557 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W2096526005 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W2106887960 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W2109729792 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W2120594341 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W2120610314 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W2120724095 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W2134649289 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W2163432304 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W2169180372 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W2466493783 @default.
• W2166284866 cites W4245618660 @default.
• W2166284866 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det080" @default.
• W2166284866 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23548332" @default.
• W2166284866 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2166284866 type Work @default.
• W2166284866 sameAs 2166284866 @default.
• W2166284866 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W2166284866 countsByYear W21662848662013 @default.
• W2166284866 countsByYear W21662848662014 @default.
• W2166284866 countsByYear W21662848662015 @default.
• W2166284866 countsByYear W21662848662016 @default.
• W2166284866 countsByYear W21662848662017 @default.
• W2166284866 countsByYear W21662848662019 @default.
• W2166284866 countsByYear W21662848662020 @default.
• W2166284866 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2166284866 hasAuthorship W2166284866A5006343045 @default.
• W2166284866 hasAuthorship W2166284866A5013850174 @default.
• W2166284866 hasAuthorship W2166284866A5025820202 @default.
• W2166284866 hasAuthorship W2166284866A5057260196 @default.
• W2166284866 hasAuthorship W2166284866A5070020081 @default.
• W2166284866 hasAuthorship W2166284866A5071983599 @default.
• W2166284866 hasAuthorship W2166284866A5090558662 @default.
• W2166284866 hasBestOaLocation W21662848661 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConcept C160099875 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConcept C207456731 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConcept C2777688143 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConcept C2778279030 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConcept C2779974597 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConcept C500014431 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConceptScore W2166284866C121332964 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConceptScore W2166284866C1276947 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConceptScore W2166284866C138816342 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConceptScore W2166284866C159110408 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConceptScore W2166284866C160099875 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConceptScore W2166284866C17744445 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConceptScore W2166284866C187212893 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConceptScore W2166284866C207456731 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConceptScore W2166284866C2777688143 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConceptScore W2166284866C2778279030 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConceptScore W2166284866C2779234561 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConceptScore W2166284866C2779974597 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConceptScore W2166284866C500014431 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConceptScore W2166284866C512399662 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConceptScore W2166284866C54355233 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConceptScore W2166284866C71924100 @default.
• W2166284866 hasConceptScore W2166284866C86803240 @default.
• W2166284866 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2166284866 hasLocation W21662848661 @default.
• W2166284866 hasLocation W21662848662 @default.
• W2166284866 hasOpenAccess W2166284866 @default.
• W2166284866 hasPrimaryLocation W21662848661 @default.
• W2166284866 hasRelatedWork W1976414158 @default.
• W2166284866 hasRelatedWork W2009546483 @default.
• W2166284866 hasRelatedWork W2056242954 @default.

• next