Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2167559728> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2167559728 endingPage "851" @default.
- W2167559728 startingPage "851" @default.
- W2167559728 abstract "<h3>Objective</h3> To develop a new scale of hearing-related function and quality of life in patients with hearing aids that addresses overlooked concerns, such as hearing-aid comfort, convenience, and cosmetic appearance, that may influence hearing-aid adherence while maintaining brevity and sensitivity to clinical change. <h3>Design</h3> Prospective, multicenter instrument validation. <h3>Setting</h3> Four diverse sites in Washington State, including 2 private practices, 1 university setting, and 1 Veterans Affairs hospital. <h3>Patients</h3> Seventy-eight patients with hearing aids. <h3>Interventions</h3> We created 2 modules in the Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (EAR) scale. The first module (Inner EAR) covers intrinsic hearing issues such as hearing in quiet and hearing in noise and is administered both before and after treatment. The second module (Outer EAR) covers extrinsic (hearing-aid related) issues such as comfort, appearance, and convenience and is administered after hearing-aid fitting. <h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3> Both scales were developed and validated in 3 stages. Stage 1 used a qualitative approach from multiple data sources to develop preliminary instruments. Stage 2 used approaches from classic test theory to reduce the number of items and psychometrically validate the instruments. Stage 3 examined the responsiveness or sensitivity to clinical change. <h3>Results</h3> A 10-item Inner EAR module and a 10-item Outer EAR module were created and validated. Internal consistency of individual domains (Cronbach α = 0.85 and 0.72, respectively) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients = 0.76 and 0.81, respectively) were excellent. Evidence of construct validity included concurrent validity with other hearing scales and global visual analog scales, discriminant validity with dizziness handicap, correlation with hearing-aid adherence, and confirmatory factor analyses. Both scales had strong evidence of responsiveness (sensitivity to change), with higher effect sizes and Guyatt responsiveness statistics than the 2 widely used hearing scales in this study. The scales took an average of 5 minutes to complete. <h3>Conclusions</h3> The EAR scale is a valid and reliable measure of the effectiveness of amplification in the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss. It addresses the range of issues that are of importance to hearing-aid patients. The scales have excellent psychometric properties, are more responsive than several widely used hearing scales, and are minimally burdensome for patients to complete. The EAR may be a valuable outcome measure in future studies of both existing hearing aids and newer hearing-aid technologies, such as bone-anchored aids or middle ear implants." @default.
- W2167559728 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2167559728 creator A5031469994 @default.
- W2167559728 creator A5041921359 @default.
- W2167559728 creator A5067743726 @default.
- W2167559728 creator A5070180819 @default.
- W2167559728 creator A5087733041 @default.
- W2167559728 creator A5090843206 @default.
- W2167559728 date "2005-10-01" @default.
- W2167559728 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2167559728 title "Development and Validation of the Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation Scale" @default.
- W2167559728 cites W1533060560 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W1551060892 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W1566936261 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W1973120218 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W1974285494 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W1980263138 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W1985621830 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W1995517645 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W1999438963 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2001156195 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2002843795 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2003521670 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2008653997 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2014025329 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2015902794 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2018968507 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2019398887 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2021024259 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2025174752 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2026375596 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2026893394 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2033035146 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2034092396 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2034232569 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2037974282 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2041533148 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2044187763 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2046485521 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2058426902 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2060767962 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2060857858 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2071740830 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2072027312 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2099676413 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2100200845 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2102131886 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2122645247 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2123960195 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2134925268 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2136987543 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2163956893 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2164562392 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2324500745 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2395860603 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2398148674 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2413084791 @default.
- W2167559728 cites W2463797643 @default.
- W2167559728 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.131.10.851" @default.
- W2167559728 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16230585" @default.
- W2167559728 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
- W2167559728 type Work @default.
- W2167559728 sameAs 2167559728 @default.
- W2167559728 citedByCount "31" @default.
- W2167559728 countsByYear W21675597282012 @default.
- W2167559728 countsByYear W21675597282013 @default.
- W2167559728 countsByYear W21675597282014 @default.
- W2167559728 countsByYear W21675597282015 @default.
- W2167559728 countsByYear W21675597282016 @default.
- W2167559728 countsByYear W21675597282017 @default.
- W2167559728 countsByYear W21675597282018 @default.
- W2167559728 countsByYear W21675597282019 @default.
- W2167559728 countsByYear W21675597282020 @default.
- W2167559728 countsByYear W21675597282021 @default.
- W2167559728 countsByYear W21675597282022 @default.
- W2167559728 countsByYear W21675597282023 @default.
- W2167559728 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2167559728 hasAuthorship W2167559728A5031469994 @default.
- W2167559728 hasAuthorship W2167559728A5041921359 @default.
- W2167559728 hasAuthorship W2167559728A5067743726 @default.
- W2167559728 hasAuthorship W2167559728A5070180819 @default.
- W2167559728 hasAuthorship W2167559728A5087733041 @default.
- W2167559728 hasAuthorship W2167559728A5090843206 @default.
- W2167559728 hasConcept C104709138 @default.
- W2167559728 hasConcept C106906290 @default.
- W2167559728 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W2167559728 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W2167559728 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
- W2167559728 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
- W2167559728 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W2167559728 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
- W2167559728 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
- W2167559728 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
- W2167559728 hasConcept C2780801066 @default.
- W2167559728 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
- W2167559728 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
- W2167559728 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W2167559728 hasConcept C70410870 @default.