FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2168049232> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2168049232 endingPage "869" @default.
• W2168049232 startingPage "851" @default.
• W2168049232 abstract "Eight years after DNA barcoding was formally proposed on a large scale, CO1 sequences are rapidly accumulating from around the world. While studies to date have mostly targeted local or regional species assemblages, the recent launch of the global iBOL project (International Barcode of Life), highlights the need to understand the effects of geographical scale on Barcoding's goals. Sampling has been central in the debate on DNA Barcoding, but the effect of the geographical scale of sampling has not yet been thoroughly and explicitly tested with empirical data. Here, we present a CO1 data set of aquatic predaceous diving beetles of the tribe Agabini, sampled throughout Europe, and use it to investigate how the geographic scale of sampling affects 1) the estimated intraspecific variation of species, 2) the genetic distance to the most closely related heterospecific, 3) the ratio of intraspecific and interspecific variation, 4) the frequency of taxonomically recognized species found to be monophyletic, and 5) query identification performance based on 6 different species assignment methods. Intraspecific variation was significantly correlated with the geographical scale of sampling (R-square = 0.7), and more than half of the species with 10 or more sampled individuals (N = 29) showed higher intraspecific variation than 1% sequence divergence. In contrast, the distance to the closest heterospecific showed a significant decrease with increasing geographical scale of sampling. The average genetic distance dropped from > 7% for samples within 1 km, to < 3.5% for samples up to > 6000 km apart. Over a third of the species were not monophyletic, and the proportion increased through locally, nationally, regionally, and continentally restricted subsets of the data. The success of identifying queries decreased with increasing spatial scale of sampling; liberal methods declined from 100% to around 90%, whereas strict methods dropped to below 50% at continental scales. The proportion of query identifications considered uncertain (more than one species < 1% distance from query) escalated from zero at local, to 50% at continental scale. Finally, by resampling the most widely sampled species we show that even if samples are collected to maximize the geographical coverage, up to 70 individuals are required to sample 95% of intraspecific variation. The results show that the geographical scale of sampling has a critical impact on the global application of DNA barcoding. Scale-effects result from the relative importance of different processes determining the composition of regional species assemblages (dispersal and ecological assembly) and global clades (demography, speciation, and extinction). The incorporation of geographical information, where available, will be required to obtain identification rates at global scales equivalent to those in regional barcoding studies. Our result hence provides an impetus for both smarter barcoding tools and sprouting national barcoding initiatives—smaller geographical scales deliver higher accuracy." @default.
• W2168049232 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2168049232 creator A5000544485 @default.
• W2168049232 creator A5003459207 @default.
• W2168049232 creator A5012870740 @default.
• W2168049232 creator A5046948243 @default.
• W2168049232 creator A5057819378 @default.
• W2168049232 creator A5061841033 @default.
• W2168049232 creator A5064374814 @default.
• W2168049232 creator A5077532222 @default.
• W2168049232 creator A5081205215 @default.
• W2168049232 creator A5086273259 @default.
• W2168049232 creator A5086768090 @default.
• W2168049232 creator A5086795196 @default.
• W2168049232 creator A5086871358 @default.
• W2168049232 creator A5088788853 @default.
• W2168049232 date "2012-03-07" @default.
• W2168049232 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2168049232 title "The Effect of Geographical Scale of Sampling on DNA Barcoding" @default.
• W2168049232 cites W1533838191 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W1571065182 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W1620317251 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W1797078191 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W1964301340 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W1970465366 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W1972332858 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W1996675266 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W1998997607 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2000579908 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2007225470 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2008735110 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2013430481 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2021582421 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2029875725 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2040766929 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2043559237 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2045295541 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2052377347 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2059934244 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2065461553 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2079293667 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2080265498 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2084447002 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2085471437 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2086792369 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2086996637 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2087414169 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2094939159 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2097793126 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2097804561 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2097939342 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2100439846 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2103308754 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2106179083 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2108268490 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2109790809 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2110835349 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2112061642 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2125028516 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2126167927 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2127586651 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2127727801 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2132130268 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2133060137 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2135503985 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2135691213 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2135778789 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2136145588 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2137015675 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2139348366 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2139397304 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2142532589 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2143946385 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2144990535 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2148376910 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2148723086 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2151409320 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2151692850 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2152408377 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2152644728 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2156441974 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2156670817 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2156970772 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2158096004 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2161854763 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2162873750 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2163147724 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2164576910 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2166972836 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2167225523 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2169113629 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2170767200 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2175417890 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2176360361 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W2344659639 @default.
• W2168049232 cites W3121953277 @default.
• W2168049232 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys037" @default.
• W2168049232 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3417044" @default.

• next