Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2169184424> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2169184424 endingPage "169" @default.
- W2169184424 startingPage "153" @default.
- W2169184424 abstract "Does the brain of a bilingual process language differently from that of a monolingual? We compared how bilinguals and monolinguals recruit classic language brain areas in response to a language task and asked whether there is a “neural signature” of bilingualism. Highly proficient and early-exposed adult Spanish-English bilinguals and English monolinguals participated. During functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), participants completed a syntactic “sentence judgment task” [Caplan, D., Alpert, N., & Waters, G. Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 541–552, 1998]. The sentences exploited differences between Spanish and English linguistic properties, allowing us to explore similarities and differences in behavioral and neural responses between bilinguals and monolinguals, and between a bilingual's two languages. If bilinguals' neural processing differs across their two languages, then differential behavioral and neural patterns should be observed in Spanish and English. Results show that behaviorally, in English, bilinguals and monolinguals had the same speed and accuracy, yet, as predicted from the Spanish-English structural differences, bilinguals had a different pattern of performance in Spanish. fMRI analyses revealed that both monolinguals (in one language) and bilinguals (in each language) showed predicted increases in activation in classic language areas (e.g., left inferior frontal cortex, LIFC), with any neural differences between the bilingual's two languages being principled and predictable based on the morphosyntactic differences between Spanish and English. However, an important difference was that bilinguals had a significantly greater increase in the blood oxygenation level-dependent signal in the LIFC (BA 45) when processing English than the English monolinguals. The results provide insight into the decades-old question about the degree of separation of bilinguals' dual-language representation. The differential activation for bilinguals and monolinguals opens the question as to whether there may possibly be a “neural signature” of bilingualism. Differential activation may further provide a fascinating window into the language processing potential not recruited in monolingual brains and reveal the biological extent of the neural architecture underlying all human language." @default.
- W2169184424 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2169184424 creator A5007783767 @default.
- W2169184424 creator A5039135788 @default.
- W2169184424 creator A5052663156 @default.
- W2169184424 date "2008-01-01" @default.
- W2169184424 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
- W2169184424 title "Bilingual and Monolingual Brains Compared: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Syntactic Processing and a Possible “Neural Signature” of Bilingualism" @default.
- W2169184424 cites W157717628 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W1586037671 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W1883204536 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W1966062573 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W1973865147 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W1975935443 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W1977579018 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W1985086416 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W1986343451 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W1987323568 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W1992564574 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W1996415504 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W1998222881 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W1999587230 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2002831560 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2008457707 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2011035448 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2022827994 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2025266015 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2031917397 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2032962364 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2035439655 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2044069080 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2046406100 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2049307459 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2050210904 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2050982168 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2051220130 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2052496657 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2062559052 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2076660722 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2084761863 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2089580750 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2095849484 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2096517085 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2101139357 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2104384966 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2113240761 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2114020321 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2115639689 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2116281127 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2116649573 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2119016460 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2119887172 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2119887662 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2121969785 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2126583934 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2128426503 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2129672791 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2137878155 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2139763851 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2140189630 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2146173057 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2148486752 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2157840032 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2159185009 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2161394824 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2162024224 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2164051460 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2167640896 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2170280839 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2170500219 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2170671382 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2171119395 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W2171260838 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W3000641081 @default.
- W2169184424 cites W4362217338 @default.
- W2169184424 doi "https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20.1.153" @default.
- W2169184424 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2643466" @default.
- W2169184424 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17919083" @default.
- W2169184424 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
- W2169184424 type Work @default.
- W2169184424 sameAs 2169184424 @default.
- W2169184424 citedByCount "73" @default.
- W2169184424 countsByYear W21691844242012 @default.
- W2169184424 countsByYear W21691844242013 @default.
- W2169184424 countsByYear W21691844242014 @default.
- W2169184424 countsByYear W21691844242015 @default.
- W2169184424 countsByYear W21691844242016 @default.
- W2169184424 countsByYear W21691844242017 @default.
- W2169184424 countsByYear W21691844242018 @default.
- W2169184424 countsByYear W21691844242019 @default.
- W2169184424 countsByYear W21691844242020 @default.
- W2169184424 countsByYear W21691844242021 @default.
- W2169184424 countsByYear W21691844242022 @default.
- W2169184424 countsByYear W21691844242023 @default.
- W2169184424 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2169184424 hasAuthorship W2169184424A5007783767 @default.
- W2169184424 hasAuthorship W2169184424A5039135788 @default.
- W2169184424 hasAuthorship W2169184424A5052663156 @default.