FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2169286073> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2169286073 endingPage "no" @default.
• W2169286073 startingPage "no" @default.
• W2169286073 abstract "Aim To test six hypotheses that could explain or mediate the positive correlation between human population density (HPD) and bird species richness while controlling for biased sampling effort. These hypotheses were labelled as follows: productivity (net primary productivity, NPP); inherent heterogeneity (diversity of vegetation types); anthropogenic heterogeneity (diversity of land uses); conservation policy (proportion of conservation land); increased productivity (human-induced productivity increases); and the reduced-slope hypothesis (which predicts that humans have a negative impact on species numbers across the full range of variation in HPD). Location Australia. Methods All data were collected at a spatial resolution of 1° across mainland Australia. Bird species richness was from 2007 atlas data and random subsampling was used to account for biased sampling effort. HPD was from the 2006 census. All other data were from government produced geographic information system layers. The most important biotic or abiotic factors influencing patterns in both species richness and HPD were assessed using simultaneous autoregressive models and an information theoretic approach. Results NPP appeared to be one of the main factors driving spatial congruence between bird species richness and HPD. Inherent habitat heterogeneity was weakly related to richness and HPD, although an interaction between heterogeneity and NPP indicated that the former may be an important determinant of species richness in low-productivity regions. There was little evidence that anthropogenic landscape heterogeneity or human-induced changes in productivity influenced the relationship between species richness and HPD, but conservation policy appeared to act as an important mediating factor and species richness was positively related to the proportion of conservation land only in regions of high HPD. Main conclusions The spatial congruence between bird species richness and HPD occurs because both respond positively to productivity and, in certain circumstances, habitat heterogeneity. Our results suggest that conservation policy could mediate this relationship, but further research is required to determine the importance of conservation reserves in supporting species in regions densely populated by humans." @default.
• W2169286073 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2169286073 creator A5009378040 @default.
• W2169286073 creator A5022028487 @default.
• W2169286073 creator A5058518344 @default.
• W2169286073 creator A5076851424 @default.
• W2169286073 date "2010-06-10" @default.
• W2169286073 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2169286073 title "What drives the positive correlation between human population density and bird species richness in Australia?" @default.
• W2169286073 cites W1960366037 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W1976087027 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W1976659895 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W1977481540 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W1979965693 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2003812494 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2004308864 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2006413292 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2008811990 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2011777898 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2021019758 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2029590433 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2035142023 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2048500526 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2057996934 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2062125007 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2067473264 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2077668915 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2078902994 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2085659172 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2097092393 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2099879847 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2105447517 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2106258158 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2108871068 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2114187690 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2124567587 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2125716837 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2130011179 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2131667669 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2140718446 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2141273791 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2142329269 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2151377349 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2152055504 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2153366215 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2164904662 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2171641394 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W2171932883 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W3126274066 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W4238205148 @default.
• W2169286073 cites W4239347882 @default.
• W2169286073 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00545.x" @default.
• W2169286073 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2169286073 type Work @default.
• W2169286073 sameAs 2169286073 @default.
• W2169286073 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2169286073 countsByYear W21692860732014 @default.
• W2169286073 countsByYear W21692860732017 @default.
• W2169286073 countsByYear W21692860732018 @default.
• W2169286073 countsByYear W21692860732019 @default.
• W2169286073 countsByYear W21692860732022 @default.
• W2169286073 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2169286073 hasAuthorship W2169286073A5009378040 @default.
• W2169286073 hasAuthorship W2169286073A5022028487 @default.
• W2169286073 hasAuthorship W2169286073A5058518344 @default.
• W2169286073 hasAuthorship W2169286073A5076851424 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConcept C132215390 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConcept C180478619 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConcept C204983608 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConcept C2776509573 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConcept C53555805 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConcept C53565203 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConcept C62648534 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConceptScore W2169286073C132215390 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConceptScore W2169286073C139719470 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConceptScore W2169286073C144024400 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConceptScore W2169286073C149923435 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConceptScore W2169286073C162324750 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConceptScore W2169286073C180478619 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConceptScore W2169286073C185933670 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConceptScore W2169286073C18903297 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConceptScore W2169286073C204983608 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConceptScore W2169286073C205649164 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConceptScore W2169286073C2776509573 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConceptScore W2169286073C2908647359 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConceptScore W2169286073C53555805 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConceptScore W2169286073C53565203 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConceptScore W2169286073C62648534 @default.
• W2169286073 hasConceptScore W2169286073C86803240 @default.

• next