FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2169365440> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2169365440 endingPage "78" @default.
• W2169365440 startingPage "67" @default.
• W2169365440 abstract "Background Some patients who undergo lower extremity bypass (LEB) for critical limb ischemia ultimately require amputation. The functional outcome achieved by these patients after amputation is not well known. Therefore, we sought to characterize the functional outcome of patients who undergo amputation after LEB, and to describe the pre- and perioperative factors associated with independent ambulation at home after lower extremity amputation. Methods Within a cohort of 3,198 patients who underwent an LEB between January, 2003 and December, 2008, we studied 436 patients who subsequently received an above-knee (AK), below-knee (BK), or minor (forefoot or toe) ipsilateral or contralateral amputation. Our main outcome measure consisted of a “good functional outcome,” defined as living at home and ambulating independently. We calculated univariate and multivariate associations among patient characteristics and our main outcome measure, as well as overall survival. Results Of the 436 patients who underwent amputation within the first year following LEB, 224 of 436 (51.4%) had a minor amputation, 105 of 436 (24.1%) had a BK amputation, and 107 of 436 (24.5%) had an AK amputation. The majority of AK (75 of 107, 72.8%) and BK amputations (72 of 105, 70.6%) occurred in the setting of bypass graft thrombosis, whereas nearly all minor amputations (200 of 224, 89.7%) occurred with a patent bypass graft. By life-table analysis at 1 year, we found that the proportion of surviving patients with a good functional outcome varied by the presence and extent of amputation (proportion surviving with good functional outcome = 88% no amputation, 81% minor amputation, 55% BK amputation, and 45% AK amputation, p = 0.001). Among those analyzed at long-term follow-up, survival was slightly lower for those who had a minor amputation when compared with those who did not receive an amputation after LEB (81 vs. 88%, p = 0.02). Survival among major amputation patients did not significantly differ compared with no amputation (BK amputation 87%, p = 0.14, AK amputation 89%, p = 0.27); however, this part of the analysis was limited by its sample size (n = 212). In multivariable analysis, we found that the patients most likely to remain ambulatory and live independently despite undergoing a lower extremity amputation were those living at home preoperatively (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-49, p = 0.058) and those with preoperative statin use (HR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2-2.1, p = 0.003), whereas the presence of several comorbidities identified patients less likely to achieve a good functional outcome: coronary disease (HR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.5-0.9, p = 0.003), dialysis (HR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.9, p = 0.02), and congestive heart failure (HR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.8, p = 0.005). Conclusions A postoperative amputation at any level impacts functional outcomes following LEB surgery, and the extent of amputation is directly related to the effect on functional outcome. It is possible, based on preoperative patient characteristics, to identify patients undergoing LEB who are most or least likely to achieve good functional outcomes even if a major amputation is ultimately required. These findings may assist in patient education and surgical decision making in patients who are poor candidates for lower extremity bypass. Some patients who undergo lower extremity bypass (LEB) for critical limb ischemia ultimately require amputation. The functional outcome achieved by these patients after amputation is not well known. Therefore, we sought to characterize the functional outcome of patients who undergo amputation after LEB, and to describe the pre- and perioperative factors associated with independent ambulation at home after lower extremity amputation. Within a cohort of 3,198 patients who underwent an LEB between January, 2003 and December, 2008, we studied 436 patients who subsequently received an above-knee (AK), below-knee (BK), or minor (forefoot or toe) ipsilateral or contralateral amputation. Our main outcome measure consisted of a “good functional outcome,” defined as living at home and ambulating independently. We calculated univariate and multivariate associations among patient characteristics and our main outcome measure, as well as overall survival. Of the 436 patients who underwent amputation within the first year following LEB, 224 of 436 (51.4%) had a minor amputation, 105 of 436 (24.1%) had a BK amputation, and 107 of 436 (24.5%) had an AK amputation. The majority of AK (75 of 107, 72.8%) and BK amputations (72 of 105, 70.6%) occurred in the setting of bypass graft thrombosis, whereas nearly all minor amputations (200 of 224, 89.7%) occurred with a patent bypass graft. By life-table analysis at 1 year, we found that the proportion of surviving patients with a good functional outcome varied by the presence and extent of amputation (proportion surviving with good functional outcome = 88% no amputation, 81% minor amputation, 55% BK amputation, and 45% AK amputation, p = 0.001). Among those analyzed at long-term follow-up, survival was slightly lower for those who had a minor amputation when compared with those who did not receive an amputation after LEB (81 vs. 88%, p = 0.02). Survival among major amputation patients did not significantly differ compared with no amputation (BK amputation 87%, p = 0.14, AK amputation 89%, p = 0.27); however, this part of the analysis was limited by its sample size (n = 212). In multivariable analysis, we found that the patients most likely to remain ambulatory and live independently despite undergoing a lower extremity amputation were those living at home preoperatively (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-49, p = 0.058) and those with preoperative statin use (HR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.2-2.1, p = 0.003), whereas the presence of several comorbidities identified patients less likely to achieve a good functional outcome: coronary disease (HR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.5-0.9, p = 0.003), dialysis (HR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.9, p = 0.02), and congestive heart failure (HR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.8, p = 0.005). A postoperative amputation at any level impacts functional outcomes following LEB surgery, and the extent of amputation is directly related to the effect on functional outcome. It is possible, based on preoperative patient characteristics, to identify patients undergoing LEB who are most or least likely to achieve good functional outcomes even if a major amputation is ultimately required. These findings may assist in patient education and surgical decision making in patients who are poor candidates for lower extremity bypass." @default.
• W2169365440 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2169365440 creator A5032316277 @default.
• W2169365440 creator A5033807648 @default.
• W2169365440 creator A5035282581 @default.
• W2169365440 creator A5044493690 @default.
• W2169365440 creator A5053614501 @default.
• W2169365440 creator A5065001569 @default.
• W2169365440 creator A5073942058 @default.
• W2169365440 creator A5074413925 @default.
• W2169365440 creator A5078066503 @default.
• W2169365440 creator A5090442172 @default.
• W2169365440 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W2169365440 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2169365440 title "Predicting Functional Status Following Amputation After Lower Extremity Bypass" @default.
• W2169365440 cites W1974738193 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W1974946573 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W1990802090 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W1994074474 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W1999704373 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W2013141877 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W2019123006 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W2024960685 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W2026985226 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W2040551748 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W2042105519 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W2042801123 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W2043517681 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W2050431722 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W2079347636 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W2098387042 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W2100415814 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W2111054174 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W2122523807 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W2148895634 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W2160810667 @default.
• W2169365440 cites W2165708016 @default.
• W2169365440 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2011.07.014" @default.
• W2169365440 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3339378" @default.
• W2169365440 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22176876" @default.
• W2169365440 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2169365440 type Work @default.
• W2169365440 sameAs 2169365440 @default.
• W2169365440 citedByCount "59" @default.
• W2169365440 countsByYear W21693654402012 @default.
• W2169365440 countsByYear W21693654402013 @default.
• W2169365440 countsByYear W21693654402014 @default.
• W2169365440 countsByYear W21693654402015 @default.
• W2169365440 countsByYear W21693654402016 @default.
• W2169365440 countsByYear W21693654402017 @default.
• W2169365440 countsByYear W21693654402018 @default.
• W2169365440 countsByYear W21693654402019 @default.
• W2169365440 countsByYear W21693654402020 @default.
• W2169365440 countsByYear W21693654402021 @default.
• W2169365440 countsByYear W21693654402022 @default.
• W2169365440 countsByYear W21693654402023 @default.
• W2169365440 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2169365440 hasAuthorship W2169365440A5032316277 @default.
• W2169365440 hasAuthorship W2169365440A5033807648 @default.
• W2169365440 hasAuthorship W2169365440A5035282581 @default.
• W2169365440 hasAuthorship W2169365440A5044493690 @default.
• W2169365440 hasAuthorship W2169365440A5053614501 @default.
• W2169365440 hasAuthorship W2169365440A5065001569 @default.
• W2169365440 hasAuthorship W2169365440A5073942058 @default.
• W2169365440 hasAuthorship W2169365440A5074413925 @default.
• W2169365440 hasAuthorship W2169365440A5078066503 @default.
• W2169365440 hasAuthorship W2169365440A5090442172 @default.
• W2169365440 hasBestOaLocation W21693654402 @default.
• W2169365440 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2169365440 hasConcept C2776204877 @default.
• W2169365440 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2169365440 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W2169365440 hasConceptScore W2169365440C141071460 @default.
• W2169365440 hasConceptScore W2169365440C2776204877 @default.
• W2169365440 hasConceptScore W2169365440C71924100 @default.
• W2169365440 hasConceptScore W2169365440C99508421 @default.
• W2169365440 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2169365440 hasLocation W21693654401 @default.
• W2169365440 hasLocation W21693654402 @default.
• W2169365440 hasLocation W21693654403 @default.
• W2169365440 hasLocation W21693654404 @default.
• W2169365440 hasLocation W21693654405 @default.
• W2169365440 hasOpenAccess W2169365440 @default.
• W2169365440 hasPrimaryLocation W21693654401 @default.
• W2169365440 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
• W2169365440 hasRelatedWork W2012720002 @default.
• W2169365440 hasRelatedWork W2036439935 @default.
• W2169365440 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2169365440 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2169365440 hasRelatedWork W2167051636 @default.
• W2169365440 hasRelatedWork W2301609197 @default.
• W2169365440 hasRelatedWork W2366666323 @default.
• W2169365440 hasRelatedWork W2397884650 @default.
• W2169365440 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2169365440 hasVolume "26" @default.
• W2169365440 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2169365440 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2169365440 magId "2169365440" @default.

• next