FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2169675062> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2169675062 endingPage "121" @default.
• W2169675062 startingPage "110" @default.
• W2169675062 abstract "We have used epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for pain control for the past 15 years. An analysis of our series of 235 patients has clarified the value of specific prognostic parameters in the prediction of successful SCS.Patients were followed up for periods ranging from 6 months to 15 years with a mean follow-up of 66 months. The mean age of the 150 men and 85 women in the study was 51.4 years. Indications for SCS included failed back syndrome (114 patients), peripheral vascular disease (39 patients), peripheral neuropathy (30 patients), multiple sclerosis (13 patients), reflex sympathetic dystrophy (13 patients), and other etiologies of chronic intractable pain (26 patients).One hundred and eighty-nine patients received permanent devices; 111 (59%) of these patients continue to receive satisfactory pain relief. Pain attributable to failed back syndrome, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, peripheral vascular disease of lower limbs, multiple sclerosis, and peripheral neuropathy responded favorably to spinal cord stimulation. In contrast, paraplegic pain, cauda equina syndrome, stump pain, phantom limb pain, and primary bone and joint disease pain did not respond as well. Cases of cauda equina injury had promising initial pain relief, but gradually declined after a few years. After long-term follow-up, 47 of the 111 successfully implanted patients were gainfully employed, compared with 22 patients before implantation. The successful patients reported improvements in daily living as well as a decrease in analgesic usage. Multipolar stimulation systems were significantly more reliable (p < 0.001) than unipolar systems. Complications included hardware malfunction, electrode displacement, infection, and tolerance.Aside from etiologies of pain syndromes as a prognostic factor, we have identified other parameters of success. In patients who have undergone previous surgical procedures, the shorter the duration of time to implantation, the greater the rate of success (p < 0.001). The diagnosis of failed back syndrome must be considered a confounding factor in our analysis. Those patients whose pain did not follow a surgical procedure had better responses to SCS than patients who had multiple surgical procedures prior to their first implant. The advent of multipolar systems has significantly improved clinical reliability over unipolar systems. Age, sex, and laterality of pain did not prove to be of significance." @default.
• W2169675062 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2169675062 creator A5018684575 @default.
• W2169675062 creator A5030521561 @default.
• W2169675062 creator A5042654554 @default.
• W2169675062 creator A5048268772 @default.
• W2169675062 date "1998-08-01" @default.
• W2169675062 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2169675062 title "Epidural spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain—some predictors of success. A 15-year experience" @default.
• W2169675062 cites W143591334 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W1595399092 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W1600362391 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W1951468956 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W1963624625 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W1967424274 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W1970735973 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W1972302612 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W1980904492 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W1989605175 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W1991090967 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W1992636898 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2002997737 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2014779151 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2019169178 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2022686354 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2025943958 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2026340892 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2027380385 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2029369233 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2037667533 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2038652353 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2045465795 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2049669784 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2051418077 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2057182247 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2060722993 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2063325293 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2079664707 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2090174301 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2092060776 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2094246392 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2106564152 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2167385448 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2317614695 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2418755668 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W2423977805 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W4246457790 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W4252252848 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W4296220478 @default.
• W2169675062 cites W4376596122 @default.
• W2169675062 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-3019(98)00012-3" @default.
• W2169675062 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9701116" @default.
• W2169675062 hasPublicationYear "1998" @default.
• W2169675062 type Work @default.
• W2169675062 sameAs 2169675062 @default.
• W2169675062 citedByCount "263" @default.
• W2169675062 countsByYear W21696750622012 @default.
• W2169675062 countsByYear W21696750622013 @default.
• W2169675062 countsByYear W21696750622014 @default.
• W2169675062 countsByYear W21696750622015 @default.
• W2169675062 countsByYear W21696750622016 @default.
• W2169675062 countsByYear W21696750622017 @default.
• W2169675062 countsByYear W21696750622018 @default.
• W2169675062 countsByYear W21696750622019 @default.
• W2169675062 countsByYear W21696750622020 @default.
• W2169675062 countsByYear W21696750622021 @default.
• W2169675062 countsByYear W21696750622022 @default.
• W2169675062 countsByYear W21696750622023 @default.
• W2169675062 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2169675062 hasAuthorship W2169675062A5018684575 @default.
• W2169675062 hasAuthorship W2169675062A5030521561 @default.
• W2169675062 hasAuthorship W2169675062A5042654554 @default.
• W2169675062 hasAuthorship W2169675062A5048268772 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConcept C137627325 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConcept C2776429440 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConcept C2780775167 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConcept C2781118164 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConcept C2781300204 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConcept C46762472 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConceptScore W2169675062C118552586 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConceptScore W2169675062C126322002 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConceptScore W2169675062C137627325 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConceptScore W2169675062C141071460 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConceptScore W2169675062C1862650 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConceptScore W2169675062C2776429440 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConceptScore W2169675062C2780775167 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConceptScore W2169675062C2781118164 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConceptScore W2169675062C2781300204 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConceptScore W2169675062C42219234 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConceptScore W2169675062C46762472 @default.
• W2169675062 hasConceptScore W2169675062C71924100 @default.
• W2169675062 hasIssue "2" @default.

• next