FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2170201259> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2170201259 endingPage "124" @default.
• W2170201259 startingPage "112" @default.
• W2170201259 abstract "The first-order dissolution rate law is used for nuclear waste glass performance predictions since 1984. A first discussion of the role of saturation effects was initiated at the MRS conference that year. In paper (1) it was stated that “For glass dissolution A * (the reaction affinity) cannot become zero since saturation only involves the reacting surface while soluble elements still might be extracted from the glass” [B. Grambow, J. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 44 (1985) 15]. Saturation of silica at the surface and condensation of surface silanol groups was considered as being responsible for the slow down of reaction rates by as much as a factor of 1000. Precipitation of Si containing secondary phases such as quartz was invoked as a mechanism for keeping final dissolution affinities higher than zero. Another (2) paper [A.B. Barkatt, P.B. Macedo, B.C. Gibson, C.J. Montrose, J. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 44 (1985) 3] stated that “… under repository conditions the extent of glass dissolution will be moderate due to saturation with respect to certain major elements (in particular, Si, Al and Ca). Consequently, the concentration levels of the more soluble glass constituents in the aqueous medium are expected to fall appreciable below their solubility limit .” The formation of dense surface layers was considered responsible for explaining the saturation effect. The mathematical model assumed stop of reaction in closed systems, once solubility limits were achieved. For more than 15 years the question of the correctness of one or the other concept has seldom been posed and has not yet been resolved. The need of repository performance assessment for validated rate laws demands a solution, particularly since the consequences of the two concepts and research requirements for the long-term glass behavior are quite different. In concept (1) the stability of the `equilibrium surface region' is not relevant because, by definition, this region is stable chemically and after a potential mechanical destruction it will be reformed instantaneously. The same is true for radiation damage. The dissolution of silica from the surface in this concept is considered as rate limiting for the release of soluble elements from the glass. After surface stabilization by local solid/solution equilibrium the release of soluble radionuclides continues with lower rates, but this is considered as resulting from parallel leaching mechanism. In fact, the deconvolutions of the overall leach mechanism into individual parallel and sequential rate limiting steps (not necessarily elementary reactions) is fundamental to this concept. In concept (2) surface stability as well as surface morphology are fundamental. A fracture in the protective surface would increase glass corrosion. The protective effect is based on the low diffusivities of radionuclides and other glass constituents in this layer. However, a true relation between layer thickness and rates is seldom observed. Diffusion coefficients are considered to vary with time as well as with the surface area to solution volume S / V ratio. Sometimes, extremely low diffusivities in extremely thin layers are invoked to explain experimental data. The two concepts are not so different from each other and one is tempted to think of a problem of semantics. In fact, there are two alternative ways by which the protective layer concept can be coupled to the saturation concept: (a) the layer may be formed by solubility effects as proposed in [loc.cit] and/or (b) the layer plays the role of a silica diffusion barrier limiting glass dissolution rates according to the first-order rate law at the interface between the pristine glass and the surface layer. However, the mathematical models based on these conceptual models yield quite different long-term predictions, even though the models may equally well fit a given set of experimental data. The models are also different with respect to the number of interrelated parameters. In the case of a model based on a surface layer slowing down glass network dissolution, the numerical value of the diffusion coefficient of silica, the layer thickness and the saturation concentration of dissolved silica are interrelated. Often, none of the parameters are measured directly. As a consequence this leads to not-sufficiently constrained models with poor predictive capacity. Recent research has indicated that there might be problems with the applicability of the first-order rate law [C. Jegou, thesis, University of Montpellier II, 1998]. Fresh glass or pre-altered glass samples were put in solutions over-saturated with silica. A decrease in reaction rates by as much as a factor of 10 was observed, but the rates remained much higher than predicted from a first-order rate law. It was argued that none of the kinetic models based on the notions of `chemical affinity' and `deviation from an equilibrium' is adapted to describe the kinetics of glass corrosion. In contrast, the formation of a surface gel and condensation of silanol groups are considered responsible for the decrease in reaction rates. The present communication argues against this view. Based on recent results of Monte Carlo calculations [M. Aertsens, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 556 (1999) 409] it is shown that some time of surface restructuration is necessary before saturation effects become fully effective in controlling long-term release of soluble glass constituents. The formation of a gel layer is not opposed to an affinity based kinetic concept, but it is in contrast a manifestation of this concept. It is the belief of the authors that much of the confusion related to the first-order rate law results from the fact that glass network dissolution is not considered as only one of a series of reaction mechanism and that glass network hydration and alkali ion exchange were ignored as parallel leaching mechanism. Our experimental results show that glass network hydration and ion exchange are important in short-term laboratory tests and in certain cases (closed system) also in the long term." @default.
• W2170201259 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2170201259 creator A5044391357 @default.
• W2170201259 creator A5067004708 @default.
• W2170201259 date "2001-09-01" @default.
• W2170201259 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2170201259 title "First-order dissolution rate law and the role of surface layers in glass performance assessment" @default.
• W2170201259 cites W1876285996 @default.
• W2170201259 cites W1967449266 @default.
• W2170201259 cites W2024402527 @default.
• W2170201259 cites W2026195483 @default.
• W2170201259 cites W2030864509 @default.
• W2170201259 cites W2031249260 @default.
• W2170201259 cites W2039799945 @default.
• W2170201259 cites W2044505503 @default.
• W2170201259 cites W2053544373 @default.
• W2170201259 cites W2064934936 @default.
• W2170201259 cites W2066440540 @default.
• W2170201259 cites W2111062635 @default.
• W2170201259 cites W2125566244 @default.
• W2170201259 cites W2314937256 @default.
• W2170201259 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3115(01)00619-5" @default.
• W2170201259 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2170201259 type Work @default.
• W2170201259 sameAs 2170201259 @default.
• W2170201259 citedByCount "206" @default.
• W2170201259 countsByYear W21702012592012 @default.
• W2170201259 countsByYear W21702012592013 @default.
• W2170201259 countsByYear W21702012592014 @default.
• W2170201259 countsByYear W21702012592015 @default.
• W2170201259 countsByYear W21702012592016 @default.
• W2170201259 countsByYear W21702012592017 @default.
• W2170201259 countsByYear W21702012592018 @default.
• W2170201259 countsByYear W21702012592019 @default.
• W2170201259 countsByYear W21702012592020 @default.
• W2170201259 countsByYear W21702012592021 @default.
• W2170201259 countsByYear W21702012592022 @default.
• W2170201259 countsByYear W21702012592023 @default.
• W2170201259 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2170201259 hasAuthorship W2170201259A5044391357 @default.
• W2170201259 hasAuthorship W2170201259A5067004708 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConcept C147789679 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConcept C155574463 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConcept C161790260 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConcept C184651966 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConcept C196616695 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConcept C199289684 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConcept C2777581007 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConcept C3020492233 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConcept C88380143 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConcept C97355855 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConcept C9930424 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConceptScore W2170201259C114614502 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConceptScore W2170201259C121332964 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConceptScore W2170201259C147789679 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConceptScore W2170201259C155574463 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConceptScore W2170201259C159985019 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConceptScore W2170201259C161790260 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConceptScore W2170201259C178790620 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConceptScore W2170201259C184651966 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConceptScore W2170201259C185592680 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConceptScore W2170201259C192562407 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConceptScore W2170201259C196616695 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConceptScore W2170201259C199289684 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConceptScore W2170201259C2777581007 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConceptScore W2170201259C3020492233 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConceptScore W2170201259C33923547 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConceptScore W2170201259C88380143 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConceptScore W2170201259C97355855 @default.
• W2170201259 hasConceptScore W2170201259C9930424 @default.
• W2170201259 hasIssue "1-2" @default.
• W2170201259 hasLocation W21702012591 @default.
• W2170201259 hasOpenAccess W2170201259 @default.
• W2170201259 hasPrimaryLocation W21702012591 @default.
• W2170201259 hasRelatedWork W1604052934 @default.
• W2170201259 hasRelatedWork W1986438144 @default.
• W2170201259 hasRelatedWork W2073515118 @default.
• W2170201259 hasRelatedWork W2089692520 @default.
• W2170201259 hasRelatedWork W2153707756 @default.
• W2170201259 hasRelatedWork W2170201259 @default.
• W2170201259 hasRelatedWork W2317037301 @default.
• W2170201259 hasRelatedWork W2346115695 @default.
• W2170201259 hasRelatedWork W3147678589 @default.
• W2170201259 hasRelatedWork W4282936361 @default.
• W2170201259 hasVolume "298" @default.
• W2170201259 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2170201259 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2170201259 magId "2170201259" @default.
• W2170201259 workType "article" @default.