FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2170703078> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2170703078 endingPage "352" @default.
• W2170703078 startingPage "347" @default.
• W2170703078 abstract "Restricted accessMoreSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Cite this article Fan J., Liu F., Wu J. and Dai W. 2004Visual perception of female physical attractivenessProc. R. Soc. Lond. B.271347–352http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2613SectionRestricted accessVisual perception of female physical attractiveness J. Fan J. Fan Institute of Textiles and Clothing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong [email protected] Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , F. Liu F. Liu Institute of Textiles and Clothing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , J. Wu J. Wu Institute of Textiles and Clothing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author and W. Dai W. Dai Institute of Textiles and Clothing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author J. Fan J. Fan Institute of Textiles and Clothing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong [email protected] Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , F. Liu F. Liu Institute of Textiles and Clothing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , J. Wu J. Wu Institute of Textiles and Clothing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author and W. Dai W. Dai Institute of Textiles and Clothing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author Published:22 February 2004https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2613AbstractOn the basis of visual assessment of figure drawings and front/profile images, past researchers believed that the waist–hip ratio (WHR) and the body mass index (BMI) were two putative cues to female physical attractiveness. However, this view was not tested on three–dimensional (3D) female images. In the present study, 3D images of 31 Caucasian females having varying body weights (BMI ranged from 16 to 35) were shown to 29 male and 25 female viewers, who were asked to rate the physical attractiveness. The results showed that the body volume divided by the square of the height, defined as volume height index (VHI), is the most important and direct visual determinant of female physical attractiveness. In determining the female attractiveness, human observers may first use VHI as a visual cue, which is also a key indicator of health and fertility owing to its strong linear relation to BMI. To fine–tune the judgement, observers may then use body proportions, the most important of which are the ratio of waist height over the chin height (WHC) (a measure of the length of legs over total tallness) and the deviation of WHR from the ideal ratio. It also appears that the effect of the body's physical parameters on the perception of female physical attractiveness conforms to Stevens' power law of psychophysics. Previous ArticleNext Article VIEW FULL TEXT DOWNLOAD PDF FiguresRelatedReferencesDetailsCited by Tovée M and Cohen-Tovée E (2021) Body Fat Percent and Distribution Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, 10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_86, (675-679), . Wang G, Ekeleme-Egedigwe C, El Hamdouchi A, Sauciuvenaite J, Bissland R, Djafarian K, Ojiambo R, Ramuth H, Holasek S, Lackner S, Diouf A, Hambly C, Vaanholt L, Cao M, Hacker M, Kruger H, Seru T, Faries M and Speakman J (2018) Beauty and the Body of the Beholder: Raters’ BMI Has Only Limited Association with Ratings of Attractiveness of the Opposite Sex, Obesity, 10.1002/oby.22092, 26:3, (522-530), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018. Thornborrow T, Jucker J, Boothroyd L and Tovée M (2018) Investigating the link between television viewing and men's preferences for female body size and shape in rural Nicaragua, Evolution and Human Behavior, 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.05.005, 39:5, (538-546), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2018. Lassek W and Gaulin S (2018) Do the Low WHRs and BMIs Judged Most Attractive Indicate Better Health?, Evolutionary Psychology, 10.1177/1474704918803998, 16:4, (147470491880399), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018. Wang G, Cao M, Sauciuvenaite J, Bissland R, Hacker M, Hambly C, Vaanholt L, Niu C, Faries M and Speakman J (2018) Different impacts of resources on opposite sex ratings of physical attractiveness by males and females, Evolution and Human Behavior, 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.12.008, 39:2, (220-225), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018. Baek E and Choo H (2018) Everybody loves beauty? The moderated effect of body attractiveness among young Koreans, Fashion and Textiles, 10.1186/s40691-018-0130-8, 5:1, Online publication date: 1-Dec-2018. Lassek W and Gaulin S (2018) Do the Low WHRs and BMIs Judged Most Attractive Indicate Higher Fertility?, Evolutionary Psychology, 10.1177/1474704918800063, 16:4, (147470491880006), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018. Bovet J (2018) The Evolution of Feminine Beauty Exploring Transdisciplinarity in Art and Sciences, 10.1007/978-3-319-76054-4_17, (327-357), . Hannier S, Baltus A and De Sutter P (2018) The role of physical satisfaction in women's sexual self-esteem, Sexologies, 10.1016/j.sexol.2017.09.010, 27:4, (e85-e95), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018. Hannier S, Baltus A and De Sutter P (2018) Le rôle de la satisfaction physique dans l’estime de soi sexuelle féminine, Sexologies, 10.1016/j.sexol.2017.09.011, 27:4, (184-195), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2018. Moussally J, Rochat L, Posada A and Van der Linden M (2016) A database of body-only computer-generated pictures of women for body-image studies: Development and preliminary validation, Behavior Research Methods, 10.3758/s13428-016-0703-7, 49:1, (172-183), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017. Tovée M, Taylor J and Cornelissen P (2017) Can we believe judgements of human physical attractiveness?, Evolution and Human Behavior, 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.10.005, 38:2, (235-240), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2017. Hannier S, Baltus A and de Sutter P (2017) L’implication des facteurs cognitifs, corporels et sociétaux dans la compréhension de l’estime de soi sexuelle féminine, Sexologies, 10.1016/j.sexol.2016.04.004, 26:2, (65-73), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2017. Xu F, Ma H, Li Y, Cai J and Gu Z (2017) Individualized Treatment of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Hypertrophic Muscular Calves With Different Bulging Units in Asian Women, Dermatologic Surgery, 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001261, 43:3, (S336-S343), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2017. de Castro M, Morgado F and Junior I (2016) Brazilian Photographic Figure Rating Scale, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 10.1177/0031512516677899, 124:1, (131-144), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017. Raposio E, Belgrano V, Santi P and Chiorri C (2016) Which is the Ideal Breast Size?, Annals of Plastic Surgery, 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000471, 76:3, (340-345), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016. Amos N and McCabe M (2015) Self-Perceptions of Sexual Attractiveness: Satisfaction With Physical Appearance is Not of Primary Importance Across Gender and Sexual Orientation, The Journal of Sex Research, 10.1080/00224499.2014.1002128, 53:2, (172-185), Online publication date: 12-Feb-2016. Cazzato V, Mele S and Urgesi C (2016) Different contributions of visual and motor brain areas during liking judgments of same- and different-gender bodies, Brain Research, 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.05.047, 1646, (98-108), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016. Tovée M and Cohen-Tovée E (2016) Body Fat Percent and Distribution Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science, 10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_86-1, (1-6), . O’Driscoll L and Jarry J (2015) Interpersonal rejection results in increased appearance satisfaction for women who rely on body weight for self-worth, Body Image, 10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.09.003, 12, (36-43), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015. Brooks R, Shelly J, Jordan L and J.W. Dixson B (2015) The multivariate evolution of female body shape in an artificial digital ecosystem, Evolution and Human Behavior, 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.02.001, 36:5, (351-358), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2015. Zueff L, Lara L, Vieira C, Martins W and Ferriani R (2014) Body Composition Characteristics Predict Sexual Functioning in Obese Women With or Without PCOS, Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 10.1080/0092623X.2013.864369, 41:3, (227-237), Online publication date: 4-May-2015. Dural S, Cetinkaya H and Gülbetekin E (2014) Hemispheric specialization in the assessment of female physical attractiveness, Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 10.1080/1357650X.2014.955503, 20:2, (232-248), Online publication date: 4-Mar-2015. Ticini L, Urgesi C and Calvo-Merino B (2015) Embodied Aesthetics: Insight from Cognitive Neuroscience of Performing Arts Aesthetics and the Embodied Mind: Beyond Art Theory and the Cartesian Mind-Body Dichotomy, 10.1007/978-94-017-9379-7_7, (103-115), . Price M, Brown S, Dukes A and Kang J (2015) Bodily Attractiveness and Egalitarianism are Negatively Related in Males, Evolutionary Psychology, 10.1177/147470491501300109, 13:1, (147470491501300), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2015. Mo J, Cheung K, Gledhill L, Pollet T, Boothroyd L and Tovée M (2013) Perceptions of Female Body Size and Shape in China, Hong Kong, and the United Kingdom, Cross-Cultural Research, 10.1177/1069397113510272, 48:1, (78-103), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2014. Zaremba Morgan A, Ulrich P, Simmons K, Gropper S, Connell L, Daniels M, Latham E and Keiley M (2014) Effectiveness of a multi-faceted, school-based health intervention program with 4th graders in Alabama, Children and Youth Services Review, 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.12.006, 37, (46-54), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2014. Caroli M and Sagone E (2013) Anti-fat Prejudice and Stereotypes in Psychology University Students, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.724, 84, (1184-1189), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013. Fuentes C, Longo M and Haggard P (2013) Body image distortions in healthy adults, Acta Psychologica, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.012, 144:2, (344-351), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013. Kościński K (2013) Attractiveness of women’s body: body mass index, waist–hip ratio, and their relative importance, Behavioral Ecology, 10.1093/beheco/art016, 24:4, (914-925), ., Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013. Rind B and Yuill R (2012) Hebephilia as Mental Disorder? A Historical, Cross-Cultural, Sociological, Cross-Species, Non-Clinical Empirical, and Evolutionary Review, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 10.1007/s10508-012-9982-y, 41:4, (797-829), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2012. Fan J, Chau K, Wan X, Zhai L and Lau E (2012) Prediction of facial attractiveness from facial proportions, Pattern Recognition, 10.1016/j.patcog.2011.11.024, 45:6, (2326-2334), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2012. Tovée M, Edmonds L and Vuong Q (2012) Categorical perception of human female physical attractiveness and health, Evolution and Human Behavior, 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.05.008, 33:2, (85-93), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2012. Bogin B (2012) Leg Length, Body Proportion, Health and Beauty1 Human Growth and Development, 10.1016/B978-0-12-383882-7.00013-1, (343-373), . Zhai L, Qian X, Wang R, Fan J and Wei H (2012) Effect of Body Image Presentation Format to Female Physical Attractiveness Transactions on Edutainment VII, 10.1007/978-3-642-29050-3_23, (239-247), . Price M, Dunn J, Hopkins S and Kang J (2012) Anthropometric correlates of human anger, Evolution and Human Behavior, 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.08.004, 33:3, (174-181), Online publication date: 1-May-2012. Faust M and Carrier S (2011) 3D body scanning: Generation Y body perception and virtual visualization Computer Technology for Textiles and Apparel, 10.1533/9780857093608.3.219, (219-244), . Price M, Kang J, Dunn J and Hopkins S (2011) Muscularity and attractiveness as predictors of human egalitarianism, Personality and Individual Differences, 10.1016/j.paid.2010.12.009, 50:5, (636-640), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2011. BROOKS R, SHELLY J, FAN J, ZHAI L and CHAU D (2010) Much more than a ratio: multivariate selection on female bodies, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02088.x, 23:10, (2238-2248), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2010. Frederick D, Hadji-Michael M, Furnham A and Swami V (2010) The influence of leg-to-body ratio (LBR) on judgments of female physical attractiveness: Assessments of computer-generated images varying in LBR, Body Image, 10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.09.001, 7:1, (51-55), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2010. Rilling J, Kaufman T, Smith E, Patel R and Worthman C (2009) Abdominal depth and waist circumference as influential determinants of human female attractiveness, Evolution and Human Behavior, 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.08.007, 30:1, (21-31), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2009. Rozmus-Wrzesińska M and Pawłowski B (2009) Atrakcyjność względnej masy i kształtu ciała Biologia atrakcyjności człowieka, 10.31338/uw.9788323511854.pp.110-165, . Cornelissen P, Hancock P, Kiviniemi V, George H and Tovée M (2009) Patterns of eye movements when male and female observers judge female attractiveness, body fat and waist-to-hip ratio, Evolution and Human Behavior, 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.04.003, 30:6, (417-428), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2009. George H, Swami V, Cornelissen P and Tovée M (2008) Preferences for body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio do not vary with observer age, Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 10.1556/JEP.6.2008.3.4, 6:3, (207-218), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2008. Brown W, Price M, Kang J, Pound N, Zhao Y and Yu H (2008) Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 10.1073/pnas.0710420105, 105:35, (12938-12943), Online publication date: 2-Sep-2008. Sohn B (2008) The Visual Illusion Using the Adequate Ease Distribution of Jacket Pattern for the Middle Aged Women of Obese Figure, Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 10.5934/KJHE.2008.17.3.469, 17:3, (469-483), Online publication date: 30-Jun-2008. Swami V, Salem N, Furnham A and Tovée M (2008) Initial examination of the validity and reliability of the female photographic figure rating scale for body image assessment, Personality and Individual Differences, 10.1016/j.paid.2008.02.002, 44:8, (1752-1761), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2008. Swami V, Miller R, Furnham A, Penke L and Tovée M (2008) The influence of men’s sexual strategies on perceptions of women’s bodily attractiveness, health and fertility, Personality and Individual Differences, 10.1016/j.paid.2007.07.017, 44:1, (98-107), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2008. Feinberg D, DeBruine L, Jones B and Little A (2008) Correlated preferences for men's facial and vocal masculinity, Evolution and Human Behavior, 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.008, 29:4, (233-241), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2008. Boncoraglio G, Martinelli R and Saino N (2007) Sex-related asymmetry in competitive ability of sexually monomorphic barn swallow nestlings, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-007-0498-8, 62:5, (729-738), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2008. Addison B, Kitaysky A and Hipfner J (2008) Sex allocation in a monomorphic seabird with a single-egg clutch: test of the environment, mate quality, and female condition hypotheses, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-008-0643-z, 63:1, (135-141), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2008. Speakman J, Djafarian K, Stewart J and Jackson D (2007) Assortative mating for obesity, The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 10.1093/ajcn/86.2.316, 86:2, (316-323), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2007. MAGRATH M, VAN LIESHOUT E, PEN I, VISSER G and KOMDEUR J (2007) Estimating expenditure on male and female offspring in a sexually size-dimorphic bird: a comparison of different methods, Journal of Animal Ecology, 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01292.x, 76:6, (1169-1180), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2007. FA J (2007) EFFECTS OF SHAPE PARAMETERS ON THE ATTRACTIVENESS OF A FEMALE BODY, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 10.2466/PMS.105.5.117-132, 105:5, (117), . Swami V, Greven C and Furnham A (2007) More than just skin-deep? A pilot study integrating physical and non-physical factors in the perception of physical attractiveness, Personality and Individual Differences, 10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.004, 42:3, (563-572), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2007. Fan J (2007) The Volume-Height Index as a Body Attractiveness Index The Body Beautiful, 10.1057/9780230596887_3, (29-45), . Smith K, Tovée M, Hancock P, Bateson M, Cox M and Cornelissen P (2007) An analysis of body shape attractiveness based on image statistics: Evidence for a dissociation between expressions of preference and shape discrimination, Visual Cognition, 10.1080/13506280601029515, 15:8, (927-953), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2007. Smith K, Cornelissen P and Tovée M (2007) Color 3D bodies and judgements of human female attractiveness, Evolution and Human Behavior, 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.007, 28:1, (48-54), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2007. Bateson M, Cornelissen P and Tovée M (2007) Methodological Issues in Studies of Female Attractiveness The Body Beautiful, 10.1057/9780230596887_4, (46-62), . Fan J, Dai W, Qian X, Chau K and Liu Q (2016) Effects of Shape Parameters on the Attractiveness of a Female Body, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 10.2466/pms.105.1.117-132, 105:1, (117-132), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2007. Tovée M, Furnham A and Swami V (2007) Healthy Body Equals Beautiful Body? Changing Perceptions of Health and Attractiveness with Shifting Socioeconomic Status The Body Beautiful, 10.1057/9780230596887_7, (108-128), . McBurney D and Streeter S (2007) Waist-to-Hip Ratios and Female Attractiveness: Comparing Apples, Oranges, and Pears The Body Beautiful, 10.1057/9780230596887_2, (15-28), . Swami V, Einon D and Furnham A (2007) Cultural significance of leg-to-body ratio preferences? Evidence from Britain and rural Malaysia, Asian Journal Of Social Psychology, 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00235.x, 10:4, (265-269), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2007. SWAMI V and TOVÉE M (2007) Perceptions of female body weight and shape among indigenous and urban Europeans, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2006.00526.x, 48:1, (43-50), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2007. Rowland E, Love O, Verspoor J, Sheldon L and Williams T (2007) Manipulating rearing conditions reveals developmental sensitivity in the smaller sex of a passerine bird, the European starling Sturnus vulgaris, Journal of Avian Biology, 10.1111/j.0908-8857.2007.04082.x, 38:5, (612-618), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2007. Zheng R, Yu W and Fan J (2007) Development of a new chinese bra sizing system based on breast anthropometric measurements, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 10.1016/j.ergon.2007.05.008, 37:8, (697-705), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2007. Swami V, Neto F, Tovée M and Furnham A (2007) Preferences for Female Body Weight and Shape in Three European Countries, European Psychologist, 10.1027/1016-9040.12.3.220, 12:3, (220-228), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2007. Swami V, Gray M and Furnham A (2016) The Female Nude in Rubens: Disconfirmatory Evidence of the Waist-to-Hip Ratio Hypothesis of Female Physical Attractiveness, Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 10.2190/R11X-5752-V164-4240, 26:1, (139-147), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2006. BOGDANOVA M, NAGER R and MONAGHAN P (2006) Does parental age affect offspring performance through differences in egg quality?, Functional Ecology, 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01088.x, 20:1, (132-141), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2006. Furnham A, Swami V and Shah K (2006) Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio and breast size correlates of ratings of attractiveness and health, Personality and Individual Differences, 10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.007, 41:3, (443-454), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2006. Swami V, Antonakopoulos N, Tovée M and Furnham A (2006) A Critical Test of the Waist-to-Hip Ratio Hypothesis of Women's Physical Attractiveness in Britain and Greece, Sex Roles, 10.1007/s11199-006-9338-3, 54:3-4, (201-211), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2006. Lim N, Zheng R, Yu W and Fan J (2006) Assessment of women’s body beauty Innovation and Technology of Women's Intimate Apparel, 10.1016/B978-1-84569-046-5.50001-X, (1-27), . Fan J, Dai W, Liu F and Wu J (2005) Visual perception of male body attractiveness, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272:1560, (219-226), Online publication date: 7-Feb-2005. Vedder O, Dekker A, Visser G and Dijkstra C (2005) Sex-specific energy requirements in nestlings of an extremely sexually size dimorphic bird, the European sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-005-0926-6, 58:4, (429-436), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2005. Swami V and Tovée M (2005) Male physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A cross-cultural study, Body Image, 10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.08.001, 2:4, (383-393), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2005. Fan J (2004) Perception of body appearance and its relation to clothing Clothing Appearance and Fit, 10.1533/9781845690380.1, (1-14), . Sorokowski P, Kościński K, Sorokowska A, Huanca T and Sueur C (2014) Preference for Women's Body Mass and Waist-to-Hip Ratio in Tsimane' Men of the Bolivian Amazon: Biological and Cultural Determinants, PLoS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0105468, 9:8, (e105468) de Castro M, Morgado F and Freitas I (2018) Brazilian Photographic Figure Rating Scale for Men: Psychometric Investigation, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 10.1177/0031512518757351, (003151251875735) Weeden J and Sabini J (2005) Physical Attractiveness and Health in Western Societies: A Review., Psychological Bulletin, 10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.635, 131:5, (635-653) Pazzaglia M, Giannini A and Federico F (2020) Acquisition of Ownership Illusion with Self-Disownership in Neurological Patients, Brain Sciences, 10.3390/brainsci10030170, 10:3, (170) Price M, Pound N, Dunn J, Hopkins S, Kang J and Sun H (2013) Body Shape Preferences: Associations with Rater Body Shape and Sociosexuality, PLoS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0052532, 8:1, (e52532) Sato N, Hopper L and Carlson E (2021) Judges’ evaluation reliability changes between identifiable and anonymous performance of hip-hop dance movements, PLOS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0245861, 16:1, (e0245861) Bogin B and Varela-Silva M (2010) Leg Length, Body Proportion, and Health: A Review with a Note on Beauty, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10.3390/ijerph7031047, 7:3, (1047-1075) Guo R, Liu B and Huang H (2011) The Study of Female Fashion Model’s Basic Walking Posture, Advanced Materials Research, 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.332-334.1272, 332-334, (1272-1275) Crossley K, Cornelissen P, Tovée M and Howe P (2012) What Is an Attractive Body? Using an Interactive 3D Program to Create the Ideal Body for You and Your Partner, PLoS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0050601, 7:11, (e50601) Khamsi R (2004) Shapes that speak volumes, Nature, 10.1038/news041220-8 This Issue22 February 2004Volume 271Issue 1537 Article InformationDOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2613PubMed:15101692Published by:Royal SocietyPrint ISSN:0962-8452Online ISSN:1471-2954History: Published online22/02/2004Published in print22/02/2004 License: Citations and impact Keywordsbody shapewaist height–chin height ratiofemale physical attractivenessdeviation of waist–hip ratiobody mass indexvolume height index Large datasets are available through Proceedings B's partnership with Dryad" @default.
• W2170703078 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2170703078 creator A5006596240 @default.
• W2170703078 creator A5044230901 @default.
• W2170703078 creator A5082330897 @default.
• W2170703078 creator A5089383325 @default.
• W2170703078 date "2004-02-22" @default.
• W2170703078 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2170703078 title "Visual perception of female physical attractiveness" @default.
• W2170703078 cites W1658022572 @default.
• W2170703078 cites W1976283642 @default.
• W2170703078 cites W1982449284 @default.
• W2170703078 cites W1988133557 @default.
• W2170703078 cites W2003087812 @default.
• W2170703078 cites W2012679564 @default.
• W2170703078 cites W2037820818 @default.
• W2170703078 cites W2106467350 @default.
• W2170703078 cites W2136694569 @default.
• W2170703078 cites W2138987454 @default.
• W2170703078 cites W2145261928 @default.
• W2170703078 cites W2167759667 @default.
• W2170703078 cites W2167781942 @default.
• W2170703078 cites W2321658797 @default.
• W2170703078 cites W2420292480 @default.
• W2170703078 cites W4245383502 @default.
• W2170703078 doi "https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2613" @default.
• W2170703078 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/1691611" @default.
• W2170703078 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15101692" @default.
• W2170703078 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2170703078 type Work @default.
• W2170703078 sameAs 2170703078 @default.
• W2170703078 citedByCount "114" @default.
• W2170703078 countsByYear W21707030782012 @default.
• W2170703078 countsByYear W21707030782013 @default.
• W2170703078 countsByYear W21707030782014 @default.
• W2170703078 countsByYear W21707030782015 @default.
• W2170703078 countsByYear W21707030782016 @default.
• W2170703078 countsByYear W21707030782017 @default.
• W2170703078 countsByYear W21707030782018 @default.
• W2170703078 countsByYear W21707030782020 @default.
• W2170703078 countsByYear W21707030782021 @default.
• W2170703078 countsByYear W21707030782022 @default.
• W2170703078 countsByYear W21707030782023 @default.
• W2170703078 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2170703078 hasAuthorship W2170703078A5006596240 @default.
• W2170703078 hasAuthorship W2170703078A5044230901 @default.
• W2170703078 hasAuthorship W2170703078A5082330897 @default.
• W2170703078 hasAuthorship W2170703078A5089383325 @default.
• W2170703078 hasBestOaLocation W21707030782 @default.
• W2170703078 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W2170703078 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2170703078 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2170703078 hasConcept C178253425 @default.
• W2170703078 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2170703078 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2170703078 hasConcept C31173074 @default.
• W2170703078 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W2170703078 hasConceptScore W2170703078C11171543 @default.
• W2170703078 hasConceptScore W2170703078C15744967 @default.
• W2170703078 hasConceptScore W2170703078C169760540 @default.
• W2170703078 hasConceptScore W2170703078C178253425 @default.
• W2170703078 hasConceptScore W2170703078C180747234 @default.
• W2170703078 hasConceptScore W2170703078C26760741 @default.
• W2170703078 hasConceptScore W2170703078C31173074 @default.
• W2170703078 hasConceptScore W2170703078C46312422 @default.
• W2170703078 hasIssue "1537" @default.
• W2170703078 hasLocation W21707030781 @default.
• W2170703078 hasLocation W21707030782 @default.
• W2170703078 hasLocation W21707030783 @default.
• W2170703078 hasLocation W21707030784 @default.
• W2170703078 hasOpenAccess W2170703078 @default.
• W2170703078 hasPrimaryLocation W21707030781 @default.
• W2170703078 hasRelatedWork W1475979667 @default.
• W2170703078 hasRelatedWork W2018262236 @default.
• W2170703078 hasRelatedWork W2030766398 @default.
• W2170703078 hasRelatedWork W2107330750 @default.
• W2170703078 hasRelatedWork W2295453057 @default.
• W2170703078 hasRelatedWork W2324626245 @default.
• W2170703078 hasRelatedWork W2325903967 @default.
• W2170703078 hasRelatedWork W2515376820 @default.
• W2170703078 hasRelatedWork W3105559479 @default.
• W2170703078 hasRelatedWork W4248569215 @default.
• W2170703078 hasVolume "271" @default.
• W2170703078 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2170703078 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2170703078 magId "2170703078" @default.
• W2170703078 workType "article" @default.