FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2170784230> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2170784230 endingPage "1610" @default.
• W2170784230 startingPage "1605" @default.
• W2170784230 abstract "Two experiments were conducted to study the effects of red pepper (Capsicum frutescens) powder or red pepper pigment on the performance and egg yolk color of laying hens. In Exp. 1, 210, thirty-wk old, Hy-line Brown laying hens were fed one of seven diets containing 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 2.0, 4.8 or 9.6 ppm red pepper pigment or 0.3 ppm carophyll red. Each diet was fed to three replicate batteries of hens with each battery consisting of a row of five cages of hens with two hens per cage (n = 3). In Exp. 2, 180, thirty-wk old, Hyline Brown laying hens, housed similarly to those in Exp. 1, were fed an unsupplemented basal diet as well as treatments in which the basal diet was supplemented with 0.8% red pepper powder processed in a laboratory blender to an average particle size of 300 μm, 0.8% red pepper powder processed as a super fine powder with a vibrational mill (44 μm) and finally 0.8% red pepper powder processed as a super fine powder with a vibrational mill but mixed with 5% Na2CO3 either before or after grinding. A diet supplemented with 0.3 ppm carophyll red pigment was also included (n = 3). In both experiments, hens were fed the red pepper powder or pigment for 14 days. After feeding of the powder or pigment was terminated, all hens were fed the basal diet for eight more days to determine if the dietary treatments had any residual effects. In Exp. 1, there were no differences in egg-laying performance, feed consumption or feed conversion ratio due to inclusion of red pepper pigment in the diet. Average egg weight was higher (p<0.05) for birds fed 1.2, 2.4 or 9.6 ppm red pepper pigment than for birds fed the diet containing 0.3 ppm red pepper pigment. On d 14, egg color scores increased linearly as the level of red pepper pigment in the diet increased. In Exp. 2, feeding red pepper powder did not affect egg-laying performance, feed consumption or feed conversion ratio (p>0.05). However, compared with the control group, supplementation with all of the red pepper powder treatments increased egg weight (p<0.05). All the red pepper powder treatments also increased (p<0.05) the yolk color score compared with the control. The results of the present study suggest that both red pepper powder and pigment are effective feed additives for improving egg yolk color for laying hens. Keywords: Egg Yolk Color; Egg Weight; Laying Hens; Pigments; Red Pepper Powder" @default.
• W2170784230 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2170784230 creator A5003787100 @default.
• W2170784230 creator A5009524123 @default.
• W2170784230 creator A5014813034 @default.
• W2170784230 creator A5021900432 @default.
• W2170784230 creator A5025899658 @default.
• W2170784230 creator A5030904824 @default.
• W2170784230 creator A5053146394 @default.
• W2170784230 creator A5057499825 @default.
• W2170784230 creator A5057590021 @default.
• W2170784230 creator A5078460092 @default.
• W2170784230 date "2012-10-22" @default.
• W2170784230 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2170784230 title "Effect of Red Pepper (Capsicum frutescens) Powder or Red Pepper Pigment on the Performance and Egg Yolk Color of Laying Hens" @default.
• W2170784230 cites W1967601894 @default.
• W2170784230 cites W1968371408 @default.
• W2170784230 cites W198013874 @default.
• W2170784230 cites W1982742136 @default.
• W2170784230 cites W2005019989 @default.
• W2170784230 cites W2055536794 @default.
• W2170784230 cites W2071584051 @default.
• W2170784230 cites W2084954515 @default.
• W2170784230 cites W2085437507 @default.
• W2170784230 cites W2104231765 @default.
• W2170784230 cites W2115409178 @default.
• W2170784230 cites W2160145890 @default.
• W2170784230 cites W2320770557 @default.
• W2170784230 cites W80756738 @default.
• W2170784230 doi "https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12235" @default.
• W2170784230 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4093037" @default.
• W2170784230 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25049523" @default.
• W2170784230 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2170784230 type Work @default.
• W2170784230 sameAs 2170784230 @default.
• W2170784230 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W2170784230 countsByYear W21707842302014 @default.
• W2170784230 countsByYear W21707842302016 @default.
• W2170784230 countsByYear W21707842302017 @default.
• W2170784230 countsByYear W21707842302018 @default.
• W2170784230 countsByYear W21707842302019 @default.
• W2170784230 countsByYear W21707842302020 @default.
• W2170784230 countsByYear W21707842302021 @default.
• W2170784230 countsByYear W21707842302023 @default.
• W2170784230 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2170784230 hasAuthorship W2170784230A5003787100 @default.
• W2170784230 hasAuthorship W2170784230A5009524123 @default.
• W2170784230 hasAuthorship W2170784230A5014813034 @default.
• W2170784230 hasAuthorship W2170784230A5021900432 @default.
• W2170784230 hasAuthorship W2170784230A5025899658 @default.
• W2170784230 hasAuthorship W2170784230A5030904824 @default.
• W2170784230 hasAuthorship W2170784230A5053146394 @default.
• W2170784230 hasAuthorship W2170784230A5057499825 @default.
• W2170784230 hasAuthorship W2170784230A5057590021 @default.
• W2170784230 hasAuthorship W2170784230A5078460092 @default.
• W2170784230 hasBestOaLocation W21707842301 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConcept C144027150 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConcept C204321447 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConcept C2776242653 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConcept C2781321622 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConcept C31903555 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConcept C64584667 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConcept C7888048 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConceptScore W2170784230C140793950 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConceptScore W2170784230C144027150 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConceptScore W2170784230C178790620 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConceptScore W2170784230C185592680 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConceptScore W2170784230C204321447 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConceptScore W2170784230C2776242653 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConceptScore W2170784230C2781321622 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConceptScore W2170784230C31903555 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConceptScore W2170784230C41008148 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConceptScore W2170784230C59822182 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConceptScore W2170784230C64584667 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConceptScore W2170784230C7888048 @default.
• W2170784230 hasConceptScore W2170784230C86803240 @default.
• W2170784230 hasIssue "11" @default.
• W2170784230 hasLocation W21707842301 @default.
• W2170784230 hasLocation W21707842302 @default.
• W2170784230 hasLocation W21707842303 @default.
• W2170784230 hasLocation W21707842304 @default.
• W2170784230 hasOpenAccess W2170784230 @default.
• W2170784230 hasPrimaryLocation W21707842301 @default.
• W2170784230 hasRelatedWork W2082910302 @default.
• W2170784230 hasRelatedWork W2145239580 @default.
• W2170784230 hasRelatedWork W2152602181 @default.
• W2170784230 hasRelatedWork W2164172223 @default.
• W2170784230 hasRelatedWork W2170784230 @default.
• W2170784230 hasRelatedWork W2371185459 @default.
• W2170784230 hasRelatedWork W2392045260 @default.
• W2170784230 hasRelatedWork W2996886969 @default.
• W2170784230 hasRelatedWork W874869755 @default.

• next