FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2170879998> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2170879998 endingPage "339" @default.
• W2170879998 startingPage "328" @default.
• W2170879998 abstract "Objective To determine if a constant rate local anesthetic delivery system is more effective than continuous intravenous (IV) morphine infusion for postoperative analgesia. Animals Twenty client-owned dogs undergoing total ear canal ablation. Methods Dogs were randomly assigned to the lidocaine group (LID) or the morphine group (MOR). The LID group received a constant rate infusion of lidocaine locally and a continuous IV infusion of saline, while the MOR group received a constant rate infusion of saline locally and a continuous IV infusion of morphine. The primary investigator evaluated each patient and determined a hospital behavior score, anesthesia recovery score, preoperative pain score, and serial postoperative pain and sedation scores over 38 hours. Pain and sedation observations were videotaped and scored by three additional evaluators. Evaluators were blinded to treatment assignments. Results There were no significant differences in age, weight, hospital behavior scores or anesthesia recovery scores. The primary investigator's pain scores were not significantly different, but sedation scores were significantly lower for the LID group. Sedation and pain scores by the video evaluators were not significantly different between groups. Kappa agreement between observers was poor, but better agreement was noted between sedation scores than pain scores. Drug-related complications were significantly lower in the LID group (n = 0) compared with the MOR group (n = 5). Wound complications were not significantly different (LID = 4, MOR = 4). Intravenous delivery complications occurred in 12 (60%) patients. Local delivery complications occurred in five (25%) dogs. Delivery complications were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions and clinical relevance Continuous incisional lidocaine delivery was an equipotent and viable method of providing postoperative analgesia compared with IV morphine. Lidocaine delivery resulted in a trend toward lower pain scores, significantly lower sedation scores, and no dogs requiring analgesic rescue. Wound complications secondary to local infusion were minor and self-limiting. Drug-related complications occurred only in the MOR group." @default.
• W2170879998 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2170879998 creator A5017320914 @default.
• W2170879998 creator A5034869358 @default.
• W2170879998 creator A5060360694 @default.
• W2170879998 creator A5081775658 @default.
• W2170879998 date "2006-09-01" @default.
• W2170879998 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2170879998 title "Evaluation of a local anesthetic delivery system for the postoperative analgesic management of canine total ear canal ablation – a randomized, controlled, double-blinded study" @default.
• W2170879998 cites W116443239 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W1521705325 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W1972657271 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W1979466659 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W1990827018 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W1997044962 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2001667184 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2001977654 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2003449197 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2010850206 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2013575488 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2018754594 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2022540067 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2029548716 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2033523151 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2045626252 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2045953126 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2050027180 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2066642374 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2077886602 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2084112009 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2085349608 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2092260090 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2103255900 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2120880008 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2130573022 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2149303604 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W2318752625 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W4230341731 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W4234587695 @default.
• W2170879998 cites W4246613217 @default.
• W2170879998 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2005.00272.x" @default.
• W2170879998 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16916355" @default.
• W2170879998 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2170879998 type Work @default.
• W2170879998 sameAs 2170879998 @default.
• W2170879998 citedByCount "42" @default.
• W2170879998 countsByYear W21708799982012 @default.
• W2170879998 countsByYear W21708799982013 @default.
• W2170879998 countsByYear W21708799982014 @default.
• W2170879998 countsByYear W21708799982016 @default.
• W2170879998 countsByYear W21708799982017 @default.
• W2170879998 countsByYear W21708799982018 @default.
• W2170879998 countsByYear W21708799982020 @default.
• W2170879998 countsByYear W21708799982021 @default.
• W2170879998 countsByYear W21708799982022 @default.
• W2170879998 countsByYear W21708799982023 @default.
• W2170879998 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2170879998 hasAuthorship W2170879998A5017320914 @default.
• W2170879998 hasAuthorship W2170879998A5034869358 @default.
• W2170879998 hasAuthorship W2170879998A5060360694 @default.
• W2170879998 hasAuthorship W2170879998A5081775658 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConcept C2776814716 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConcept C2777389121 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConcept C2777397205 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConcept C2778162923 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConcept C2778994108 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConcept C2780149897 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConcept C2780820201 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConceptScore W2170879998C141071460 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConceptScore W2170879998C168563851 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConceptScore W2170879998C2776814716 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConceptScore W2170879998C2777389121 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConceptScore W2170879998C2777397205 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConceptScore W2170879998C2778162923 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConceptScore W2170879998C2778994108 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConceptScore W2170879998C2780149897 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConceptScore W2170879998C2780820201 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConceptScore W2170879998C42219234 @default.
• W2170879998 hasConceptScore W2170879998C71924100 @default.
• W2170879998 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2170879998 hasLocation W21708799981 @default.
• W2170879998 hasLocation W21708799982 @default.
• W2170879998 hasOpenAccess W2170879998 @default.
• W2170879998 hasPrimaryLocation W21708799981 @default.
• W2170879998 hasRelatedWork W1987536037 @default.
• W2170879998 hasRelatedWork W2087369361 @default.
• W2170879998 hasRelatedWork W2087791781 @default.
• W2170879998 hasRelatedWork W2106266041 @default.
• W2170879998 hasRelatedWork W2108449715 @default.
• W2170879998 hasRelatedWork W2138811304 @default.
• W2170879998 hasRelatedWork W2344847369 @default.
• W2170879998 hasRelatedWork W2989992314 @default.
• W2170879998 hasRelatedWork W3010729560 @default.
• W2170879998 hasRelatedWork W598415708 @default.

• next