FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2170895162> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2170895162 endingPage "526" @default.
• W2170895162 startingPage "526" @default.
• W2170895162 abstract "The functional outcomes following ankle arthrodesis are not known. The purpose of the present study was to compare the intermediate-term clinical results for a group of patients in whom an ankle arthrodesis had been performed with use of modern surgical techniques with the findings for a group of healthy gender and age-matched controls on the basis of validated outcome measures and gait analysis.Twenty-six patients who had undergone ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of isolated unilateral ankle arthritis were identified and retrospectively assessed clinically and radiographically. The mean age at the time of surgery was fifty-four years, and the mean interval between surgery and assessment was forty-four months. A gender and age-matched control group of twenty-seven individuals was recruited for comparison. All subjects were evaluated with gait analysis, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot scale, the Musculoskeletal Outcomes Data Evaluation and Management Systems (MODEMS) questionnaire, and the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS).On preliminary review, twenty of the twenty-six patients were completely satisfied or satisfied with their surgical outcome. All patients but one stated that they would undergo the surgery again. Five patients stated that they did not notice a gait abnormality. Twelve patients wore orthotics, and all believed that the use of the orthotics improved their gait. When the functional outcome scores in the arthrodesis group were compared with those in the control group, specific scores assessing hindfoot pain and satisfaction were similar. However, scores focusing on ankle-hindfoot function and disability revealed significant differences. Gait analysis also identified significant differences between the two groups with regard to cadence and stride length. In addition, there was significantly decreased sagittal, coronal, and transverse range of motion of the hindfoot and midfoot during the stance and swing phases of gait in the arthrodesis group. Radiographic review demonstrated that four of the twenty-six patients had development of moderate to severe arthritis of the subtalar joint.In the intermediate term following an arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis, pain is reliably relieved and there is good patient satisfaction. However, there are substantial differences between patients and the normal population with regard to hindfoot function and gait. On the basis of these results, patients should be counseled that an ankle fusion will help to relieve pain and to improve overall function; however, it is a salvage procedure that will cause persistent alterations in gait with a potential for deterioration due to the development of ipsilateral hindfoot arthritis." @default.
• W2170895162 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2170895162 creator A5046710418 @default.
• W2170895162 creator A5062253540 @default.
• W2170895162 creator A5078119206 @default.
• W2170895162 date "2006-03-01" @default.
• W2170895162 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2170895162 title "Gait Analysis and Functional Outcomes Following Ankle Arthrodesis for Isolated Ankle Arthritis" @default.
• W2170895162 cites W1843551521 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W1860404053 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W187226818 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W1888854436 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W1917648315 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W1918516048 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W1957894554 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W1978387064 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W1981858734 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W1985418604 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W1990464760 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W1994335812 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W1998074142 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2013050292 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2015412314 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2028334564 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2037377025 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2037466812 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2040017974 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2042176937 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2044109196 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2044142027 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2047707946 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2047757813 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2048505759 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2051916326 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2057348935 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2070925632 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2071832436 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2080871271 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2082342902 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2084427648 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2087154396 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2089508234 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2090087742 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2095426776 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2107791701 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2111083980 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2117739031 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2118032575 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2126744360 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2152317029 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2158193884 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2166795149 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2168850366 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2169843047 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2170475039 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2183655527 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2242940173 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2248522670 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2257136983 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2257720702 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2320183890 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2326180186 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2327970351 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2331259047 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W2395970812 @default.
• W2170895162 cites W377494486 @default.
• W2170895162 doi "https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.e.00521" @default.
• W2170895162 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16510818" @default.
• W2170895162 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2170895162 type Work @default.
• W2170895162 sameAs 2170895162 @default.
• W2170895162 citedByCount "134" @default.
• W2170895162 countsByYear W21708951622012 @default.
• W2170895162 countsByYear W21708951622013 @default.
• W2170895162 countsByYear W21708951622014 @default.
• W2170895162 countsByYear W21708951622015 @default.
• W2170895162 countsByYear W21708951622016 @default.
• W2170895162 countsByYear W21708951622017 @default.
• W2170895162 countsByYear W21708951622018 @default.
• W2170895162 countsByYear W21708951622019 @default.
• W2170895162 countsByYear W21708951622020 @default.
• W2170895162 countsByYear W21708951622021 @default.
• W2170895162 countsByYear W21708951622022 @default.
• W2170895162 countsByYear W21708951622023 @default.
• W2170895162 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2170895162 hasAuthorship W2170895162A5046710418 @default.
• W2170895162 hasAuthorship W2170895162A5062253540 @default.
• W2170895162 hasAuthorship W2170895162A5078119206 @default.
• W2170895162 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2170895162 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2170895162 hasConcept C151800584 @default.
• W2170895162 hasConcept C173906292 @default.
• W2170895162 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2170895162 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2170895162 hasConcept C2776164576 @default.
• W2170895162 hasConcept C2776462017 @default.
• W2170895162 hasConcept C2778640784 @default.
• W2170895162 hasConcept C2781298600 @default.

• next