FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2170975817> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2170975817 endingPage "476" @default.
• W2170975817 startingPage "468" @default.
• W2170975817 abstract "Within life cycle impact assessment (LCIA), ‘panel methods’ has become a common term to denominate methods that elicit and measure stakeholders’ stated preferences on environmental impact categories. Such panel procedures use different question formats to elicit information on weighting across impact categories from the stakeholders. The two most frequently used question formats are score allocation and choice between alternatives. The differences between these two question formats were analyzed in order to give advice on how to frame future panel procedures. A choice-based weighting procedure (choice experiment) for the three damage categories of human health, ecosystems quality, and resources was developed and executed. A logistic regression model was applied in order to estimate the weighting factors for the polled sample. Results from this choice-based procedure were compared to the results from an allocation-based procedure described in part 1 of this paper. When weighting factors are elicited by score allocation questions, panelists tend to distribute the scores more equally. A factor of 1.5 between the least and the most weighted damage category was found. Weighting factors from a choice experiment were more spread, i.e., the most important category was weighted considerably higher, whereas the other two categories were weighted less. Thus, for the choice experiment, the range between the most and the least weighted categories was considerably bigger—by about a factor of 4. A comparison of the two procedures revealed that the weighting of environmental damage categories is considerably influenced by the question of format. The reason for these variations may be different cognitive routines that are applied. In addition, several advantages and shortcomings of choice experiments are discussed. The developed, choice-based procedure provided meaningful results. Thus, choice experiments, often used for the monetary valuation of environmental goods, can also be applied in LCIA to elicit nonmonetary weighting factors. Choice experiments form a new interesting approach for weighting procedures in the future as they have some advantages over the often used score allocation methods. They are simple and more realistic than other procedures, as panelists have practiced in choice tasks from everyday life. We, therefore, recommend such choice-based procedures for future panel studies." @default.
• W2170975817 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2170975817 creator A5020171024 @default.
• W2170975817 creator A5087315862 @default.
• W2170975817 date "2008-08-15" @default.
• W2170975817 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2170975817 title "Measuring preferences on environmental damages in LCIA. Part 2: choice and allocation questions in panel methods" @default.
• W2170975817 cites W1547045683 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W1996248524 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2001254830 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2011452094 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2012179744 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2014089538 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2017494716 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2018881506 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2031116152 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2033306588 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2036504682 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2051965204 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2066882324 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2078666525 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2102015862 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2128766176 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2132845289 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2146584964 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2161448739 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2165588304 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W2579555219 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W3124698825 @default.
• W2170975817 cites W4301958211 @default.
• W2170975817 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-008-0022-z" @default.
• W2170975817 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2170975817 type Work @default.
• W2170975817 sameAs 2170975817 @default.
• W2170975817 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2170975817 countsByYear W21709758172012 @default.
• W2170975817 countsByYear W21709758172015 @default.
• W2170975817 countsByYear W21709758172016 @default.
• W2170975817 countsByYear W21709758172017 @default.
• W2170975817 countsByYear W21709758172018 @default.
• W2170975817 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2170975817 hasAuthorship W2170975817A5020171024 @default.
• W2170975817 hasAuthorship W2170975817A5087315862 @default.
• W2170975817 hasBestOaLocation W21709758172 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConcept C134560507 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConcept C183115368 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConceptScore W2170975817C105795698 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConceptScore W2170975817C111472728 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConceptScore W2170975817C126838900 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConceptScore W2170975817C127413603 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConceptScore W2170975817C134560507 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConceptScore W2170975817C138885662 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConceptScore W2170975817C149782125 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConceptScore W2170975817C162324750 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConceptScore W2170975817C183115368 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConceptScore W2170975817C185592680 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConceptScore W2170975817C198531522 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConceptScore W2170975817C2779530757 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConceptScore W2170975817C33923547 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConceptScore W2170975817C41008148 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConceptScore W2170975817C42475967 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConceptScore W2170975817C43617362 @default.
• W2170975817 hasConceptScore W2170975817C71924100 @default.
• W2170975817 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2170975817 hasLocation W21709758171 @default.
• W2170975817 hasLocation W21709758172 @default.
• W2170975817 hasLocation W21709758173 @default.
• W2170975817 hasOpenAccess W2170975817 @default.
• W2170975817 hasPrimaryLocation W21709758171 @default.
• W2170975817 hasRelatedWork W2057402848 @default.
• W2170975817 hasRelatedWork W2082876471 @default.
• W2170975817 hasRelatedWork W2205545377 @default.
• W2170975817 hasRelatedWork W2249676594 @default.
• W2170975817 hasRelatedWork W2519422835 @default.
• W2170975817 hasRelatedWork W2997254181 @default.
• W2170975817 hasRelatedWork W3172114134 @default.
• W2170975817 hasRelatedWork W4300819064 @default.
• W2170975817 hasRelatedWork W4309852942 @default.
• W2170975817 hasRelatedWork W4311191074 @default.
• W2170975817 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W2170975817 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2170975817 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2170975817 magId "2170975817" @default.

• next