FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2171494825> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2171494825 endingPage "544" @default.
• W2171494825 startingPage "523" @default.
• W2171494825 abstract "Whilst it has long been recognized that disabled employees can be the recipients of discrimination in the workplace, occasioned by many factors including physical appearance, relatively little is known regarding the ethical conceptualizations, trust responses and also problem-solving architecture that potential employees bring to such contexts, particularly in service industries such as tourism/hospitality. This study has examined discrimination shown to a disabled hospitality industry employee within an ethical framework, investigating personal ethical beliefs, individual ethical influences upon behaviour and also perceived management problem-solving response influences in the face of disability discrimination. The study has been conducted among a sample of university management students in a major Australian tourism destination, many of whom on graduation would seek employment within the tourism/hospitality industry. Three personal ethical belief types were identified: equity or procedural justice, competence and integrity, with both competence and integrity ethics being regarded as of higher value than equity. Major individual ethical influences included one's own values and also those of the ambient society; the most highly rated perceived management response involved the protection of company image whereas the least expected involved a management perspective focusing on justice of all people involved in the ethical dilemma. The competence ethical belief was found to predict the individual who would be influenced by a legal perspective; the justice for all management perspective was employed as a measure of respondent trust in management, with analyses revealing that the competence ethical belief, the career and societal influences and also gender being found associated with lower levels of trust in management's willingness to respond to disability discrimination in a just manner. The protection of company image as a management response, employed as a measure of mistrust, was associated with integrity personal ethical values, and also with career, societal and own ethical influences upon responses to an incident of disability discrimination. Implications for future research in this domain together with implications for the tourism/hospitality industry are examined." @default.
• W2171494825 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2171494825 creator A5065725102 @default.
• W2171494825 date "2004-12-01" @default.
• W2171494825 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2171494825 title "Ethics, trust and expectations regarding the treatment of disabled staff within a tourism/hospitality industry context" @default.
• W2171494825 cites W134093680 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W1514840475 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W1582443226 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W1896773696 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W190090055 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W1978028214 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W1983398045 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W1990944405 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W1991114087 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W1997487501 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W1999599299 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W2005023408 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W2008604075 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W2016762717 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W2035585199 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W2048871564 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W2050051753 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W2066804802 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W2073629122 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W2078670775 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W2085788882 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W2129125364 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W2137915925 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W2138335471 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W2141054444 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W2165143480 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W2172052405 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W3121516499 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W4214585689 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W78621501 @default.
• W2171494825 cites W2083618939 @default.
• W2171494825 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2004.02.005" @default.
• W2171494825 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2171494825 type Work @default.
• W2171494825 sameAs 2171494825 @default.
• W2171494825 citedByCount "48" @default.
• W2171494825 countsByYear W21714948252012 @default.
• W2171494825 countsByYear W21714948252013 @default.
• W2171494825 countsByYear W21714948252014 @default.
• W2171494825 countsByYear W21714948252015 @default.
• W2171494825 countsByYear W21714948252016 @default.
• W2171494825 countsByYear W21714948252017 @default.
• W2171494825 countsByYear W21714948252018 @default.
• W2171494825 countsByYear W21714948252020 @default.
• W2171494825 countsByYear W21714948252021 @default.
• W2171494825 countsByYear W21714948252022 @default.
• W2171494825 countsByYear W21714948252023 @default.
• W2171494825 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2171494825 hasAuthorship W2171494825A5065725102 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConcept C100521375 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConcept C107482638 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConcept C157298493 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConcept C18918823 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConcept C189705334 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConcept C2776640315 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConcept C525551149 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConceptScore W2171494825C100521375 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConceptScore W2171494825C107482638 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConceptScore W2171494825C157298493 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConceptScore W2171494825C15744967 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConceptScore W2171494825C17744445 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConceptScore W2171494825C18918823 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConceptScore W2171494825C189705334 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConceptScore W2171494825C199539241 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConceptScore W2171494825C2776640315 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConceptScore W2171494825C39549134 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConceptScore W2171494825C525551149 @default.
• W2171494825 hasConceptScore W2171494825C77805123 @default.
• W2171494825 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2171494825 hasLocation W21714948251 @default.
• W2171494825 hasOpenAccess W2171494825 @default.
• W2171494825 hasPrimaryLocation W21714948251 @default.
• W2171494825 hasRelatedWork W1599961482 @default.
• W2171494825 hasRelatedWork W1924203896 @default.
• W2171494825 hasRelatedWork W1982260190 @default.
• W2171494825 hasRelatedWork W1998345192 @default.
• W2171494825 hasRelatedWork W2231320953 @default.
• W2171494825 hasRelatedWork W2390572170 @default.
• W2171494825 hasRelatedWork W2755372480 @default.
• W2171494825 hasRelatedWork W2791967636 @default.
• W2171494825 hasRelatedWork W3015950937 @default.
• W2171494825 hasRelatedWork W3213754269 @default.
• W2171494825 hasVolume "23" @default.
• W2171494825 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2171494825 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2171494825 magId "2171494825" @default.
• W2171494825 workType "article" @default.