FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2171696941> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2171696941 endingPage "485" @default.
• W2171696941 startingPage "457" @default.
• W2171696941 abstract "‘Nanotechnology’ is often touted as a significant emerging technological field. However, determining what nanotechnology means, whose research counts as nanotechnology, and who gets to speak on behalf of nanotechnology is a highly political process involving constant negotiation with significant implications for funding, legislation, and citizen support. In this paper, we deconstruct a high-profile moment of controversy about nanotechnology’s possibilities: a debate between K. Eric Drexler and Richard Smalley published as a ‘point—counterpoint’ feature in 2003 in Chemical & Engineering News. Rather than treat the debate as a stand-alone episode of scientific controversy, we seek to understand the forces that enabled it to be seen as such an episode. We introduce the term ‘para-scientific’ media to make explicit how certain forms of publication intervene in the dissemination of technical knowledge as it travels beyond its supposed site of production. The existence of para-scientific media is predicated on intimate association with formalized channels of scientific publication, but they also seek to engage other cultures of expertise. Through this lens, we show that Drexler and Smalley were not only independent entrepreneurs enrolling Chemical & Engineering News as a site of boundary work; members of the para-scientific media actively enrolled Drexler and Smalley as part of a broader effort to simplify a complex set of uncertainties about nanotechnology’s potential into two polarized views. In this case study, we examine received accounts of the debate, describe the boundary work undertaken by Drexler and Smalley to shape the path of nanotechnology’s emergence, and unpack the boundary work of the para-scientific media to create polarizing controversy that attracted audiences and influenced policy and scientific research agendas. Members of the para-scientific media have been influential in bounding nanotechnology as a field-in-tension by structuring irreconcilable dichotomies out of an ambiguous set of uncertainties. We conclude with thoughts about the implications of this case study for studies of science communication, institutional entrepreneurship and the ethics of emerging technologies." @default.
• W2171696941 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2171696941 creator A5008574731 @default.
• W2171696941 creator A5042292328 @default.
• W2171696941 date "2011-04-08" @default.
• W2171696941 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2171696941 title "Bounding an emerging technology: Para-scientific media and the Drexler-Smalley debate about nanotechnology" @default.
• W2171696941 cites W140961567 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W1491701704 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W1539977191 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W1878023686 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W1891747916 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W1968356925 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2003504714 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2012709649 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2018483092 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2022359655 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2030294156 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2031543531 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2033894846 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2040335018 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2051353887 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2051473676 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2066201502 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2079952929 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2096860496 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2100512356 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2102069141 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2102078339 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2120906865 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2135330221 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2146629399 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2160799914 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2169234605 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2181505627 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2240995249 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2333909909 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W2481822735 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W3124615742 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W3124736729 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W4233352912 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W4233916635 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W4242023420 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W4244911143 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W4248638751 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W4252099360 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W4254377203 @default.
• W2171696941 cites W637709759 @default.
• W2171696941 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711402722" @default.
• W2171696941 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2171696941 type Work @default.
• W2171696941 sameAs 2171696941 @default.
• W2171696941 citedByCount "44" @default.
• W2171696941 countsByYear W21716969412012 @default.
• W2171696941 countsByYear W21716969412013 @default.
• W2171696941 countsByYear W21716969412014 @default.
• W2171696941 countsByYear W21716969412015 @default.
• W2171696941 countsByYear W21716969412016 @default.
• W2171696941 countsByYear W21716969412017 @default.
• W2171696941 countsByYear W21716969412018 @default.
• W2171696941 countsByYear W21716969412019 @default.
• W2171696941 countsByYear W21716969412020 @default.
• W2171696941 countsByYear W21716969412021 @default.
• W2171696941 countsByYear W21716969412022 @default.
• W2171696941 countsByYear W21716969412023 @default.
• W2171696941 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2171696941 hasAuthorship W2171696941A5008574731 @default.
• W2171696941 hasAuthorship W2171696941A5042292328 @default.
• W2171696941 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2171696941 hasConcept C171250308 @default.
• W2171696941 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2171696941 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2171696941 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2171696941 hasConcept C199776023 @default.
• W2171696941 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
• W2171696941 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2171696941 hasConceptScore W2171696941C144024400 @default.
• W2171696941 hasConceptScore W2171696941C171250308 @default.
• W2171696941 hasConceptScore W2171696941C17744445 @default.
• W2171696941 hasConceptScore W2171696941C192562407 @default.
• W2171696941 hasConceptScore W2171696941C199539241 @default.
• W2171696941 hasConceptScore W2171696941C199776023 @default.
• W2171696941 hasConceptScore W2171696941C2777351106 @default.
• W2171696941 hasConceptScore W2171696941C36289849 @default.
• W2171696941 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2171696941 hasLocation W21716969411 @default.
• W2171696941 hasOpenAccess W2171696941 @default.
• W2171696941 hasPrimaryLocation W21716969411 @default.
• W2171696941 hasRelatedWork W100772206 @default.
• W2171696941 hasRelatedWork W2123207742 @default.
• W2171696941 hasRelatedWork W2145347481 @default.
• W2171696941 hasRelatedWork W2285408170 @default.
• W2171696941 hasRelatedWork W2368648031 @default.
• W2171696941 hasRelatedWork W2505793267 @default.
• W2171696941 hasRelatedWork W2750573122 @default.
• W2171696941 hasRelatedWork W2768877217 @default.
• W2171696941 hasRelatedWork W3203846410 @default.
• W2171696941 hasRelatedWork W87067804 @default.

• next