FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2171930107> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2171930107 endingPage "54" @default.
• W2171930107 startingPage "42" @default.
• W2171930107 abstract "Objective: To describe the development and psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire assessing the ease of use that patients associate with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) modalities.Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted with patients who had experience with intravenous (IV) PCA for postoperative pain management to generate items relevant to the ease of using PCA modalities. The content validity of the resulting questionnaire was examined through follow-up patient interviews, and an expert panel reviewed the questionnaire. Cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with patients to determine the clarity and content of the instructions, items, and response scales, and the ease of completing the instrument. Psychometric evaluation was performed with patients who had undergone surgery and received IV PCA for postoperative pain management. Item and scale quality and the internal consistency reliability of the questionnaire were assessed. Construct validity was evaluated by examining the relationship between subscales of the questionnaire with patient-reported outcome measures. Known-groups validity was determined by assessing the instrument's ability to differentiate between patients with versus without an IV PCA problem. A potential limitation of this study was the exclusive sampling of patients who had experience with IV PCA.Results: The Patient Ease-of-Care (EOC) Questionnaire included 23 items in the following subscales: Confidence with Device, Comfort with Device, Movement, Dosing Confidence, Pain Control, Knowledge/Understanding, and Satisfaction. Coefficient alpha reliability estimates were ≥0.66 for Overall EOC (includes all subscales except Satisfaction) and all EOC subscales. Construct validity was supported by the moderate relationship between the Pain Control subscale and measures of pain severity and pain interference; additional evidence of construct validity was provided by correlations of the Confidence with Device subscale, the Satisfaction subscale, and Overall EOC with measures of pain severity, pain interference, and satisfaction. Significant mean score differences were reported between participants with and without IV PCA problems for Overall EOC and for the Comfort with Device, Confidence with Device, Movement, Pain Control, and Satisfaction subscales indicating known-groups validity.Conclusions: Results provide evidence for the reliability and validity of the Patient EOC Questionnaire as a measure of the ease of use that patients associate with PCA systems and may be useful for evaluating emerging PCA modalities." @default.
• W2171930107 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2171930107 creator A5012212211 @default.
• W2171930107 creator A5045211615 @default.
• W2171930107 creator A5049607183 @default.
• W2171930107 creator A5050436029 @default.
• W2171930107 creator A5071841919 @default.
• W2171930107 creator A5077613669 @default.
• W2171930107 creator A5078293267 @default.
• W2171930107 date "2009-12-14" @default.
• W2171930107 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2171930107 title "Development and validation of a new instrument to evaluate the ease of use of patient-controlled analgesic modalities for postoperative patients" @default.
• W2171930107 cites W133498000 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W1606460755 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W1964726420 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W1975900999 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W1978878970 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W1985776343 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W1987220405 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W1988042859 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W2007609603 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W2018410113 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W2055905750 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W2058392982 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W2062177826 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W2063100453 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W2068430529 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W2075743030 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W2077146290 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W2079371293 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W2107031757 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W2121178797 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W2125033361 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W2141885592 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W2157662040 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W2410748872 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W2417436692 @default.
• W2171930107 cites W283688882 @default.
• W2171930107 doi "https://doi.org/10.3111/13696990903484637" @default.
• W2171930107 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20001659" @default.
• W2171930107 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2171930107 type Work @default.
• W2171930107 sameAs 2171930107 @default.
• W2171930107 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W2171930107 countsByYear W21719301072013 @default.
• W2171930107 countsByYear W21719301072014 @default.
• W2171930107 countsByYear W21719301072015 @default.
• W2171930107 countsByYear W21719301072016 @default.
• W2171930107 countsByYear W21719301072017 @default.
• W2171930107 countsByYear W21719301072018 @default.
• W2171930107 countsByYear W21719301072019 @default.
• W2171930107 countsByYear W21719301072021 @default.
• W2171930107 countsByYear W21719301072022 @default.
• W2171930107 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2171930107 hasAuthorship W2171930107A5012212211 @default.
• W2171930107 hasAuthorship W2171930107A5045211615 @default.
• W2171930107 hasAuthorship W2171930107A5049607183 @default.
• W2171930107 hasAuthorship W2171930107A5050436029 @default.
• W2171930107 hasAuthorship W2171930107A5071841919 @default.
• W2171930107 hasAuthorship W2171930107A5077613669 @default.
• W2171930107 hasAuthorship W2171930107A5078293267 @default.
• W2171930107 hasBestOaLocation W21719301071 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C106906290 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C202695956 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C2779903281 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C49453240 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C58916136 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConceptScore W2171930107C106906290 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConceptScore W2171930107C107457646 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConceptScore W2171930107C121332964 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConceptScore W2171930107C141071460 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConceptScore W2171930107C144024400 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConceptScore W2171930107C163258240 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConceptScore W2171930107C170130773 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConceptScore W2171930107C171606756 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConceptScore W2171930107C1862650 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConceptScore W2171930107C202695956 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConceptScore W2171930107C2775944032 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConceptScore W2171930107C2779903281 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConceptScore W2171930107C36289849 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConceptScore W2171930107C41008148 @default.
• W2171930107 hasConceptScore W2171930107C43214815 @default.

• next