Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2172184624> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2172184624 endingPage "327" @default.
- W2172184624 startingPage "322" @default.
- W2172184624 abstract "The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA), with radiographic follow-up or surgical excision, in conjunction with on-site cytopathologic support in the management of nonpalpable breast lesions.The findings of 266 consecutive mammographically or sonographically identified, nonpalpable lesions (228 patients) that underwent US-guided FNA were examined retrospectively. Clustered microcalcifications did not undergo biopsy with this method. Patients who underwent follow-up excisional biopsy or mammography with a duration of at least 24 months were included in the study.In all, 117 lesions met criteria for inclusion, of which 85 (73%) were diagnosed as benign at cytopathologic evaluation and underwent mammographic follow-up of at least 24 months (range, 24-67 months; mean, 36 months). Thirty-two lesions (27%) had either malignant or atypical cytopathologic findings, for which surgery was recommended. Eleven (9%) of the 32 had malignant cytopathologic findings from initial US-guided FNA, which were confirmed at surgical excision. The remaining 21 lesions (18%) were diagnosed as atypical on the basis of US-guided FNA results. Of these, 18 lesions underwent excisional biopsy: Two were diagnosed as carcinoma (not otherwise specified), and 16 were diagnosed with a variety of benign disorders. The remaining three patients with atypical lesions chose mammographic follow-up rather than surgical diagnosis, and their conditions have remained stable for more than 24 months. Of the 85 benign cases, one changed during follow-up (12 months) and underwent repeat biopsy, with malignancy noted. The sensitivity of US-guided FNA in identifying malignant lesions was 93% (13 of 14), and the specificity of a benign finding was 100% (102 of 102). The positive and negative predictive values of US-guided FNA supported by on-site cytopathologic evaluation were 100% (13 of 13) and 99% (102 of 103), respectively.Supported by appropriately trained on-site cytopathologists and in conjunction with follow-up mammography, US-guided FNA appears to be efficacious in the management of patients with abnormal radiographic findings. It is quick, relatively inexpensive, and minimally invasive, and, in the presence of competent cytopathologists, should be the modality of choice." @default.
- W2172184624 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2172184624 creator A5004022151 @default.
- W2172184624 creator A5009985322 @default.
- W2172184624 creator A5010028420 @default.
- W2172184624 creator A5018700409 @default.
- W2172184624 creator A5068620118 @default.
- W2172184624 creator A5080840856 @default.
- W2172184624 date "2001-04-01" @default.
- W2172184624 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
- W2172184624 title "Role of US-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration with On-Site Cytopathologic Evaluation in Management of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions" @default.
- W2172184624 cites W1700124606 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W1974162300 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W1984962116 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W1996229448 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2004995758 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2007074353 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2012632505 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2012777067 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2012945005 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2032691177 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2033698302 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2034423790 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2036377266 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2036447102 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2039602243 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2039980786 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2044243109 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2048288134 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2058855818 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2059068665 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2062501297 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2074387461 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2079012109 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2084338857 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2095084464 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2149345560 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2154170756 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2156716777 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2170065248 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2172141682 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2242251260 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2324976535 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2326272175 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W2331892609 @default.
- W2172184624 cites W4253085298 @default.
- W2172184624 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1076-6332(03)80501-9" @default.
- W2172184624 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11293780" @default.
- W2172184624 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
- W2172184624 type Work @default.
- W2172184624 sameAs 2172184624 @default.
- W2172184624 citedByCount "13" @default.
- W2172184624 countsByYear W21721846242012 @default.
- W2172184624 countsByYear W21721846242013 @default.
- W2172184624 countsByYear W21721846242014 @default.
- W2172184624 countsByYear W21721846242017 @default.
- W2172184624 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2172184624 hasAuthorship W2172184624A5004022151 @default.
- W2172184624 hasAuthorship W2172184624A5009985322 @default.
- W2172184624 hasAuthorship W2172184624A5010028420 @default.
- W2172184624 hasAuthorship W2172184624A5018700409 @default.
- W2172184624 hasAuthorship W2172184624A5068620118 @default.
- W2172184624 hasAuthorship W2172184624A5080840856 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConcept C2776170712 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConcept C2777517664 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConcept C2777546739 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConcept C2779399171 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConceptScore W2172184624C121608353 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConceptScore W2172184624C126322002 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConceptScore W2172184624C126838900 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConceptScore W2172184624C141071460 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConceptScore W2172184624C142724271 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConceptScore W2172184624C2775934546 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConceptScore W2172184624C2776170712 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConceptScore W2172184624C2777517664 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConceptScore W2172184624C2777546739 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConceptScore W2172184624C2779399171 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConceptScore W2172184624C2780472235 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConceptScore W2172184624C530470458 @default.
- W2172184624 hasConceptScore W2172184624C71924100 @default.
- W2172184624 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W2172184624 hasLocation W21721846241 @default.
- W2172184624 hasLocation W21721846242 @default.
- W2172184624 hasOpenAccess W2172184624 @default.
- W2172184624 hasPrimaryLocation W21721846241 @default.
- W2172184624 hasRelatedWork W2011944327 @default.
- W2172184624 hasRelatedWork W2035735170 @default.
- W2172184624 hasRelatedWork W2036332378 @default.
- W2172184624 hasRelatedWork W2054070720 @default.