FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2175462103> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2175462103 endingPage "505A" @default.
• W2175462103 startingPage "505A" @default.
• W2175462103 abstract "SESSION TITLE: Imaging PostersSESSION TYPE: Original Investigation PosterPRESENTED ON: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 01:30 PM - 02:30 PMPURPOSE: Ultrasound is an essential diagnostic tool in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although ultrasound is frequently the only diagnostic imaging modality available in resource-limited countries (RLCs), these countries often lack clinicians with expertise obtaining and interpreting ultrasound images. We previously demonstrated that remote intensivists can guide minimally trained non-physicians to obtain high-quality ultrasound images using e-ICU technology and that ultrasound images transmitted locally by FaceTime are of similar quality to those transmitted by e-ICU technology. Because e-ICU software can be prohibitively expensive for RLCs, commercially available video-chat software may present an affordable alternative. Unfortunately, the quality of internet connectivity throughout the developing world can be unreliable, and technological advances proven domestically may not be feasible in RLCs. We conducted a feasibility pilot to evaluate the quality of ultrasound images obtained by non-physicians in a developing country using a remote tele-mentored ultrasound system constructed using commercially available video-chat software.METHODS: An ultrasound-trained physician provided a 10-minute training session on the use of the SonoSite ultrasound machine to Haitian non-physicians. A remote tele-intensivist located at the University of Maryland used an Apple MacBook operating FaceTime to provide real-time direction to the non-physician “ultrasonographer” located near Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Images of the ultrasonographer and the ultrasound machine were transmitted to the remote tele-intensivist using a wireless internet connection and an iPhone 5 operating FaceTime. The non-physician obtained images of the right internal jugular vein, bilateral lung apices and bases, heart (subxiphoid view), and bladder. The tele-intensivist completed an image checklist and used a five-point Likert scale to evaluate to the image quality.RESULTS: Nine Haitian non-physicians obtained sixty-three images. The intensivist agreed (defined as “agree” or “strongly agree” on a five-point-Likert scale) that 90% (57/63) of the FaceTime images were high quality. The intensivist felt comfortable making clinical decisions using FaceTime images 89% (56/63) of the time.CONCLUSIONS: High-quality, clinically relevant ultrasound images can be captured using commercially available video-chat software in RLC's.CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Commercially available video-chat software can affordably optimize the clinical role of ultrasonography in RLC's.DISCLOSURE: The following authors have nothing to disclose: Andrea Levine, Jessica Buchner, James Lantry, Marc Zubrow, Avelino Verceles, Michael McCurdyNo Product/Research Disclosure Information SESSION TITLE: Imaging Posters SESSION TYPE: Original Investigation Poster PRESENTED ON: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 at 01:30 PM - 02:30 PM PURPOSE: Ultrasound is an essential diagnostic tool in the intensive care unit (ICU). Although ultrasound is frequently the only diagnostic imaging modality available in resource-limited countries (RLCs), these countries often lack clinicians with expertise obtaining and interpreting ultrasound images. We previously demonstrated that remote intensivists can guide minimally trained non-physicians to obtain high-quality ultrasound images using e-ICU technology and that ultrasound images transmitted locally by FaceTime are of similar quality to those transmitted by e-ICU technology. Because e-ICU software can be prohibitively expensive for RLCs, commercially available video-chat software may present an affordable alternative. Unfortunately, the quality of internet connectivity throughout the developing world can be unreliable, and technological advances proven domestically may not be feasible in RLCs. We conducted a feasibility pilot to evaluate the quality of ultrasound images obtained by non-physicians in a developing country using a remote tele-mentored ultrasound system constructed using commercially available video-chat software. METHODS: An ultrasound-trained physician provided a 10-minute training session on the use of the SonoSite ultrasound machine to Haitian non-physicians. A remote tele-intensivist located at the University of Maryland used an Apple MacBook operating FaceTime to provide real-time direction to the non-physician “ultrasonographer” located near Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Images of the ultrasonographer and the ultrasound machine were transmitted to the remote tele-intensivist using a wireless internet connection and an iPhone 5 operating FaceTime. The non-physician obtained images of the right internal jugular vein, bilateral lung apices and bases, heart (subxiphoid view), and bladder. The tele-intensivist completed an image checklist and used a five-point Likert scale to evaluate to the image quality. RESULTS: Nine Haitian non-physicians obtained sixty-three images. The intensivist agreed (defined as “agree” or “strongly agree” on a five-point-Likert scale) that 90% (57/63) of the FaceTime images were high quality. The intensivist felt comfortable making clinical decisions using FaceTime images 89% (56/63) of the time. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality, clinically relevant ultrasound images can be captured using commercially available video-chat software in RLC's. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Commercially available video-chat software can affordably optimize the clinical role of ultrasonography in RLC's. DISCLOSURE: The following authors have nothing to disclose: Andrea Levine, Jessica Buchner, James Lantry, Marc Zubrow, Avelino Verceles, Michael McCurdy No Product/Research Disclosure Information" @default.
• W2175462103 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2175462103 creator A5016299027 @default.
• W2175462103 creator A5030135877 @default.
• W2175462103 creator A5058036469 @default.
• W2175462103 creator A5067546110 @default.
• W2175462103 creator A5074535491 @default.
• W2175462103 creator A5075777842 @default.
• W2175462103 date "2015-10-01" @default.
• W2175462103 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W2175462103 title "High Quality Ultrasound Images Can Be Acquired by Nonphysicians in Developing Countries Instructed by Tele-Intensivists Using Commercially Available Video-Chat Technology" @default.
• W2175462103 doi "https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.2275107" @default.
• W2175462103 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2175462103 type Work @default.
• W2175462103 sameAs 2175462103 @default.
• W2175462103 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2175462103 countsByYear W21754621032023 @default.
• W2175462103 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2175462103 hasAuthorship W2175462103A5016299027 @default.
• W2175462103 hasAuthorship W2175462103A5030135877 @default.
• W2175462103 hasAuthorship W2175462103A5058036469 @default.
• W2175462103 hasAuthorship W2175462103A5067546110 @default.
• W2175462103 hasAuthorship W2175462103A5074535491 @default.
• W2175462103 hasAuthorship W2175462103A5075777842 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConcept C2776376669 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConcept C2777904410 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConcept C2777925291 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConcept C2779182362 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConcept C83849155 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConceptScore W2175462103C110875604 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConceptScore W2175462103C111472728 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConceptScore W2175462103C111919701 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConceptScore W2175462103C126838900 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConceptScore W2175462103C136764020 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConceptScore W2175462103C138885662 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConceptScore W2175462103C143753070 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConceptScore W2175462103C177713679 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConceptScore W2175462103C19527891 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConceptScore W2175462103C2776376669 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConceptScore W2175462103C2777904410 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConceptScore W2175462103C2777925291 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConceptScore W2175462103C2779182362 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConceptScore W2175462103C2779530757 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConceptScore W2175462103C41008148 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConceptScore W2175462103C545542383 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConceptScore W2175462103C71924100 @default.
• W2175462103 hasConceptScore W2175462103C83849155 @default.
• W2175462103 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2175462103 hasLocation W21754621031 @default.
• W2175462103 hasOpenAccess W2175462103 @default.
• W2175462103 hasPrimaryLocation W21754621031 @default.
• W2175462103 hasRelatedWork W2012024150 @default.
• W2175462103 hasRelatedWork W2313898269 @default.
• W2175462103 hasRelatedWork W2314603853 @default.
• W2175462103 hasRelatedWork W2895885845 @default.
• W2175462103 hasRelatedWork W293230282 @default.
• W2175462103 hasRelatedWork W3005033405 @default.
• W2175462103 hasRelatedWork W3034735175 @default.
• W2175462103 hasRelatedWork W3173816910 @default.
• W2175462103 hasRelatedWork W4283778163 @default.
• W2175462103 hasRelatedWork W2090294401 @default.
• W2175462103 hasVolume "148" @default.
• W2175462103 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2175462103 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2175462103 magId "2175462103" @default.
• W2175462103 workType "article" @default.