FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2176564315> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2176564315 endingPage "e1389" @default.
• W2176564315 startingPage "e1389" @default.
• W2176564315 abstract "Purpose. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the hypothetical model based on structural relationship with the occupational dysfunction on psychological problems (stress response, burnout syndrome, and depression) in healthcare workers. Method. Three cross sectional studies were conducted to assess the following relations: (1) occupational dysfunction on stress response ( n = 468), (2) occupational dysfunction on burnout syndrome ( n = 1,142), and (3) occupational dysfunction on depression ( n = 687). Personal characteristics were collected through a questionnaire (such as age, gender, and job category, opportunities for refreshment, time spent on leisure activities, and work relationships) as well as the Classification and Assessment of Occupational Dysfunction (CAOD). Furthermore, study 1 included the Stress Response Scale-18 (SRS-18), study 2 used the Japanese Burnout Scale (JBS), and study 3 employed the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and path analysis of structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis were used in all of the studies. EFA and CFA were used to measure structural validity of four assessments; CAOD, SRS-18, JBS, and CES-D. For examination of a potential covariate, we assessed the correlation of the total and factor score of CAOD and personal factors in all studies. Moreover, direct and indirect effects of occupational dysfunction on stress response (Study 1), burnout syndrome (Study 2), and depression (Study 3) were also analyzed. Results. In study 1, CAOD had 16 items and 4 factors. In Study 2 and 3, CAOD had 16 items and 5 factors. SRS-18 had 18 items and 3 factors, JBS had 17 items and 3 factors, and CES-D had 20 items and 4 factors. All studies found that there were significant correlations between the CAOD total score and the personal factor that included opportunities for refreshment, time spent on leisure activities, and work relationships ( p < 0.01). The hypothesis model results suggest that the classification of occupational dysfunction had good fit on the stress response (RMSEA = 0.061, CFI = 0.947, and TLI = 0.943), burnout syndrome (RMSEA = 0.076, CFI = 0.919, and TLI = 0.913), and depression (RMSEA = 0.060, CFI = 0.922, TLI = 0.917). Moreover, the detected covariates include opportunities for refreshment, time spent on leisure activities, and work relationships on occupational dysfunction. Conclusion. Our findings indicate that psychological problems are associated with occupational dysfunction in healthcare workers. Reduction of occupational dysfunction might be a strategy of better preventive occupational therapies for healthcare workers with psychological problems. However, longitudinal studies will be needed to determine a causal relationship." @default.
• W2176564315 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2176564315 creator A5017484112 @default.
• W2176564315 creator A5051028639 @default.
• W2176564315 date "2015-11-19" @default.
• W2176564315 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2176564315 title "Analysis of structural relationship among the occupational dysfunction on the psychological problem in healthcare workers: a study using structural equation modeling" @default.
• W2176564315 cites W1496664559 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W1762422602 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W1795044592 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W1951612752 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2010955419 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2019748568 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2040098371 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2041073203 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2051927054 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2059254063 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2068201939 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2071686171 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2074859679 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2091061434 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2092938057 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2098213641 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2099509161 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2124235631 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2129819045 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2152459596 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2163433021 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2164180428 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2168038341 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W2323492756 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W3021849140 @default.
• W2176564315 cites W4234760778 @default.
• W2176564315 doi "https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1389" @default.
• W2176564315 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4655103" @default.
• W2176564315 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26618078" @default.
• W2176564315 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2176564315 type Work @default.
• W2176564315 sameAs 2176564315 @default.
• W2176564315 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2176564315 countsByYear W21765643152016 @default.
• W2176564315 countsByYear W21765643152018 @default.
• W2176564315 countsByYear W21765643152019 @default.
• W2176564315 countsByYear W21765643152021 @default.
• W2176564315 countsByYear W21765643152022 @default.
• W2176564315 countsByYear W21765643152023 @default.
• W2176564315 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2176564315 hasAuthorship W2176564315A5017484112 @default.
• W2176564315 hasAuthorship W2176564315A5051028639 @default.
• W2176564315 hasBestOaLocation W21765643151 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C143916079 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C165957694 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C2776788475 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C2778564845 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C2780755674 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C3019858935 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C40722632 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C558461103 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C71104824 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C82793941 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConcept C88519622 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C105795698 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C118552586 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C121332964 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C143916079 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C15744967 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C165957694 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C171606756 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C2776788475 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C2778564845 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C2778755073 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C2780755674 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C3019858935 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C33923547 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C40722632 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C558461103 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C62520636 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C70410870 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C71104824 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C71924100 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C82793941 @default.
• W2176564315 hasConceptScore W2176564315C88519622 @default.
• W2176564315 hasLocation W21765643151 @default.
• W2176564315 hasLocation W21765643152 @default.
• W2176564315 hasLocation W21765643153 @default.
• W2176564315 hasLocation W21765643154 @default.
• W2176564315 hasLocation W21765643155 @default.
• W2176564315 hasLocation W21765643156 @default.

• next