FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2176725010> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2176725010 abstract "DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000814IntroductionThe practice of stream restoration has become widely accepted asan essential component to improving ecosystem function andenhancing aquatic biodiversity (Wohl et al. 2005). Despite theabundance of projects being implemented, a lack of definitivetrainingrequirements,designprocedures,andmonitoringprotocolsremain for the practice of stream restoration. Given the lack ofconsistency, many restoration projects end in frustration, excessivecosts, and poor results (e.g., Williams et al. 1995; Kondolf 1998;Johnson and Brown 2001; Roni et al. 2002; Wohl et al. 2005;Bernhardt et al. 2007; Roni et al. 2008). The fact that methodand experience are both varied and even poorly defined in anew and emerging profession is not surprising; however, the com-bination of diverse and inconsistent training and methodologymakes progress in transforming the practice of stream restorationinto a mature profession difficult. The widespread practice of re-storation, now a billion dollar a year industry in the United States(Bernhardt et al. 2005), coupled with highly inconsistent results,demands its conversion into a profession with broadly acceptedprinciples and methods of tested reliability.As a profession advances, it must have ways to assess andassure the adequacy of education and training curricula and thecompetency of individual professionals (Ford and Gibbs 1996;Pomeroy-Huff et al. 2009). At the core of the process of maturinga profession is the establishment of a body of knowledge (BOK), adocument generated by experts to identify and delineate theconcepts, facts, and skills that practitioners in that profession areexpected to master (Morris et al. 2006; Pomeroy-Huff et al.2009). For example, project management professionals saw a clearneed to formulate a common and consistent set of core competen-cies on which they could base a project management certificationand advance their emerging profession (Morris et al. 2006; Winteret al. 2006). In the emerging profession of stream restoration, asimilar call exists for the establishment of consistent training stan-dards, standards of practice, and professional certification, drivenlargely by the lack of agreed on criteria for judging restoration suc-cess and highly inconsistent project results (Palmer et al. 2005;Marr 2009; Kite 2009; Fischenich 2009). The development of aprofession with standards of practice and/or certification first re-quires establishment of a training and education structure that pro-vides consistency and can support and incorporate advances inunderstanding (Morris et al. 2006).A fully effective symbiosis among research, training, andpractice has yet to emerge in stream restoration; however, severalattemptsweremadeduringthepast10yearstoestablishthecurrentandfutureneedsinstreamrestoration educationandtraining [RiverRestoration Northwest (RRNW) 2003; (AFS Curriculum WorkingGroup, unpublished data, 2003); P. Wilcock, unpublished internalreport, December 2006 RRNW, in cooperation with Oregon StateUniversity and Portland State University, sought to advance thequality of the river restoration practice by identifying restorationeducational needs (RRNW 2003). In 2003, RRNWand its partnersimplemented a survey to assess the job tasks, educational back-grounds, and training needs of professionals working on river re-storation projects in the northwestern United States and Canada.The key results are as follows.1. Available training is multidisciplinary with most universityand short courses focused on ecology, fluvial geomorphology,fisheries, restoration, and soils. Fisheries biologists and civilengineershavethegreatestrangeoftrainingacrossdisciplines.2. Improved skills and competence in fluvial geomorphology,field techniques, restoration techniques, and biology/ecologywere identified as important for a practicing professional." @default.
• W2176725010 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2176725010 creator A5003657053 @default.
• W2176725010 creator A5014207145 @default.
• W2176725010 creator A5033363628 @default.
• W2176725010 creator A5050505028 @default.
• W2176725010 creator A5056342466 @default.
• W2176725010 date "2014-02-01" @default.
• W2176725010 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2176725010 title "Defining a Stream Restoration Body of Knowledge as a Basis for National Certification" @default.
• W2176725010 cites W1486000578 @default.
• W2176725010 cites W1571331290 @default.
• W2176725010 cites W1965779102 @default.
• W2176725010 cites W2035629762 @default.
• W2176725010 cites W2057667887 @default.
• W2176725010 cites W2068649094 @default.
• W2176725010 cites W2069298659 @default.
• W2176725010 cites W2080608502 @default.
• W2176725010 cites W2098061713 @default.
• W2176725010 cites W2125454074 @default.
• W2176725010 cites W2149683554 @default.
• W2176725010 cites W2153670188 @default.
• W2176725010 cites W2153869277 @default.
• W2176725010 cites W2319440775 @default.
• W2176725010 cites W2572217102 @default.
• W2176725010 cites W2573894086 @default.
• W2176725010 cites W2794570811 @default.
• W2176725010 cites W3023235878 @default.
• W2176725010 doi "https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0000814" @default.
• W2176725010 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2176725010 type Work @default.
• W2176725010 sameAs 2176725010 @default.
• W2176725010 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2176725010 countsByYear W21767250102014 @default.
• W2176725010 countsByYear W21767250102015 @default.
• W2176725010 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2176725010 hasAuthorship W2176725010A5003657053 @default.
• W2176725010 hasAuthorship W2176725010A5014207145 @default.
• W2176725010 hasAuthorship W2176725010A5033363628 @default.
• W2176725010 hasAuthorship W2176725010A5050505028 @default.
• W2176725010 hasAuthorship W2176725010A5056342466 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConcept C14036430 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConcept C46304622 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConcept C78458016 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConceptScore W2176725010C127413603 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConceptScore W2176725010C14036430 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConceptScore W2176725010C144024400 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConceptScore W2176725010C15744967 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConceptScore W2176725010C17744445 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConceptScore W2176725010C199539241 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConceptScore W2176725010C46304622 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConceptScore W2176725010C55587333 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConceptScore W2176725010C78458016 @default.
• W2176725010 hasConceptScore W2176725010C86803240 @default.
• W2176725010 hasLocation W21767250101 @default.
• W2176725010 hasOpenAccess W2176725010 @default.
• W2176725010 hasPrimaryLocation W21767250101 @default.
• W2176725010 hasRelatedWork W108817721 @default.
• W2176725010 hasRelatedWork W1550528543 @default.
• W2176725010 hasRelatedWork W1979435499 @default.
• W2176725010 hasRelatedWork W2014104514 @default.
• W2176725010 hasRelatedWork W2087895338 @default.
• W2176725010 hasRelatedWork W2116671506 @default.
• W2176725010 hasRelatedWork W2164594965 @default.
• W2176725010 hasRelatedWork W2396596822 @default.
• W2176725010 hasRelatedWork W2617294690 @default.
• W2176725010 hasRelatedWork W2944053653 @default.
• W2176725010 hasRelatedWork W340887692 @default.
• W2176725010 hasRelatedWork W2182977223 @default.
• W2176725010 hasRelatedWork W2305254822 @default.
• W2176725010 hasRelatedWork W3112641469 @default.
• W2176725010 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2176725010 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2176725010 magId "2176725010" @default.
• W2176725010 workType "article" @default.