FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2176837510> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2176837510 endingPage "111" @default.
• W2176837510 startingPage "111" @default.
• W2176837510 abstract "Layering EngagementThe Temporal Dynamics of Transmedia Television Elizabeth Evans (bio) The last fifteen years have seen dramatic changes in the UK within both the television industry and televisual storytelling techniques. Rapid technological changes have not only increased the variety of screen devices but have also changed the boundaries of the industry itself, as the Internet opened up distribution avenues and alternatives for viewer attention in the form of social media. The traditional pillars of the UK television industry—the major broadcasters and content providers such as the bbc and itv—have responded to these changes by expanding their focus beyond the television set and onto newer, more portable screen devices. This shift has had consequences both for the kinds of narratives emerging from television and the experiences that such narratives craft for their audiences. Increasingly, techniques of transmedia storytelling (see Jenkins 2006) are becoming “quite routine” (Grainge and Johnson 2015: 124) rather [End Page 111] than exceptional, a core part of television programming’s standard repertoire of narrative techniques. However, such changes to storytelling techniques only emerge from concrete industrial strategies. As Karoline Andrea Ihlebæk, Trine Syvertsen, and Espen Ytreberg argue, “tv’s transformations do not just happen to it, by virtue for instance of technological developments, but are actively made by those who want to stay in charge and also conquer new digital territories” (2014: 483–84). Examining these strategies and unpacking how transmedia television narratives operate reveals the shifting power relations within the mainstream media industries and the position of narrative within these relations. As Phillip Napoli argues in his examination of the changing construction of audiences in the US media industries, “the process of audience evolution is being driven in large part by technological changes that are fundamentally reconfiguring the dynamic between media audiences and content providers” (2013: 122). The development of transmedia narrative strategies speaks to the industry’s desire to regain control in this changeable media landscape and demonstrates the intersection between narrative and the industrial and technological context from which it emerges (see A. Smith 2013). This article will examine the relationship between industry strategy and transmedia storytelling techniques through the prism of contemporary UK television, in particular a case study of itv’s The X Factor (2003–) and its transmedia expansion. The focus will be on narrative extensions that are designed for mobile screen devices such as tablets and smartphones and that appear as small, focused software apps. The portability of such devices, and so the ease with which viewers can use them while also watching television, has given rise to behavior known as “second screening” or “simultaneous media use” (see Hassoun 2014). Ethan Tussey has argued that by expanding television narratives onto such devices, television producers and broadcasters are able to direct such behavior toward a “digital extension of [their] media property” (2014: 207–8). This article will build on Tussey’s work to consider the specific strategies employed in the industry’s management of secondscreen behavior, and in particular the way narrative, design, and timing are brought together to layer different viewer roles onto a single [End Page 112] broadcast moment. Central to the UK television industry’s co-optation of these behaviors is the adoption and adaptation of television’s temporal dynamics. By considering how television studies can look to its own past and reappropriate foundational models to understand these strategies, this article will examine how the changes to television’s narratives exist in a context of both change and continuity. The X Factor’s second-screen app emerges from a longer history of transmedia expansion in UK television. The first phase of transmedia television in the UK came via experiments in the early 2000s, primarily by the bbc, in extending television texts via content-rich websites or games that could be played through their (by then well established) online portal (bbc.co.uk). Such experiments, through flagship programs such as Spooks (2002–10) and Doctor Who (1963–), offered a space not only for narrative expansions and experiments but also for technical development by testing the capacity of the relatively new broadband infrastructure. Exploiting the temporality of linear television storytelling, in particular the gaps between episodes of serial..." @default.
• W2176837510 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2176837510 creator A5031071900 @default.
• W2176837510 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W2176837510 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2176837510 title "Layering Engagement: The Temporal Dynamics of Transmedia Television" @default.
• W2176837510 cites W1491750598 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W1505527077 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W1515450974 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W1528579282 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W1530508392 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W1562211433 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W1589993609 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W1590838602 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W1823656855 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W2030079657 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W203795214 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W2087999014 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W2120347984 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W2122614950 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W2123118487 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W2154223810 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W226349543 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W2300567117 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W2328416403 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W2519005279 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W255401215 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W2582828159 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W630036277 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W631929991 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W641356021 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W652986767 @default.
• W2176837510 cites W950982245 @default.
• W2176837510 doi "https://doi.org/10.5250/storyworlds.7.2.0111" @default.
• W2176837510 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2176837510 type Work @default.
• W2176837510 sameAs 2176837510 @default.
• W2176837510 citedByCount "21" @default.
• W2176837510 countsByYear W21768375102017 @default.
• W2176837510 countsByYear W21768375102018 @default.
• W2176837510 countsByYear W21768375102019 @default.
• W2176837510 countsByYear W21768375102020 @default.
• W2176837510 countsByYear W21768375102021 @default.
• W2176837510 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2176837510 hasAuthorship W2176837510A5031071900 @default.
• W2176837510 hasBestOaLocation W21768375102 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConcept C145912823 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConcept C199033989 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConcept C2776538412 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConcept C2777617010 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConcept C2779732396 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConcept C29595303 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConcept C49774154 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConcept C549876090 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConceptScore W2176837510C112698675 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConceptScore W2176837510C124952713 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConceptScore W2176837510C142362112 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConceptScore W2176837510C144024400 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConceptScore W2176837510C144133560 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConceptScore W2176837510C145912823 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConceptScore W2176837510C153349607 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConceptScore W2176837510C17744445 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConceptScore W2176837510C19417346 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConceptScore W2176837510C199033989 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConceptScore W2176837510C199539241 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConceptScore W2176837510C2776538412 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConceptScore W2176837510C2777617010 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConceptScore W2176837510C2779732396 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConceptScore W2176837510C29595303 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConceptScore W2176837510C41008148 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConceptScore W2176837510C49774154 @default.
• W2176837510 hasConceptScore W2176837510C549876090 @default.
• W2176837510 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2176837510 hasLocation W21768375101 @default.
• W2176837510 hasLocation W21768375102 @default.
• W2176837510 hasOpenAccess W2176837510 @default.
• W2176837510 hasPrimaryLocation W21768375101 @default.
• W2176837510 hasRelatedWork W1992457175 @default.
• W2176837510 hasRelatedWork W2047464564 @default.
• W2176837510 hasRelatedWork W2464835736 @default.
• W2176837510 hasRelatedWork W2531388623 @default.
• W2176837510 hasRelatedWork W2799137402 @default.
• W2176837510 hasRelatedWork W2905042109 @default.
• W2176837510 hasRelatedWork W2996707013 @default.
• W2176837510 hasRelatedWork W3096581622 @default.
• W2176837510 hasRelatedWork W41454851 @default.
• W2176837510 hasRelatedWork W4312141778 @default.
• W2176837510 hasVolume "7" @default.

• next