FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2176927932> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2176927932 endingPage "83" @default.
• W2176927932 startingPage "69" @default.
• W2176927932 abstract "Summary Important challenges remain in the development of optimized control strategies for intelligent wells, particularly with respect to incorporating the impact of reservoir uncertainty. Most optimization methods are model-based and are effective only if the model or ensemble of models used in the optimization captures all possible reservoir behaviors at the individual-well and -completion level. This is rarely the case. Moreover, reservoir models are rarely predictive at the spatial and temporal scales required to identify control actions. We evaluate the benefit of the use of closed-loop control strategies, on the basis of direct feedback between reservoir monitoring and inflow-valve settings, within a geologically heterogeneous, thin oil-rim reservoir. This approach does not omit model predictions completely; rather, model predictions are used to optimize a number of adjustable parameters within a general direct feedback relationship between measured data and inflow-control settings. A high-resolution sector model is used to capture reservoir heterogeneity, which incorporates a locally refined horizontal grid in the oil zone, to accurately represent the horizontal-well geometry and fluid contacts, and capture water and gas flow. Two inflow-control strategies are tested. The first is an open-loop approach, using fixed inflow-control devices to balance the pressure drawdown along the well, sized before installation. The second is a closed-loop, feedback-control strategy, using variable inflow-control valves that can be controlled from the surface in response to multiphase-flow data obtained downhole. The closed-loop strategy is optimized with a base-case model, and then tested against unexpected reservoir behavior by adjusting a number of uncertain parameters in the model but not reoptimizing. We find that closed-loop feedback control yields positive gains in net-present value (NPV) for the majority of reservoir behaviors investigated, and higher gains than the open-loop strategy. Closed-loop control also can yield positive gains in NPV even when the reservoir does not behave as expected, and in tested scenarios returned a near optimal NPV. However, inflow control can be risky, because unpredicted reservoir behavior also leads to negative returns. Moreover, assessing the benefits of inflow control over an arbitrarily fixed well life can be misleading, because observed gains depend on when the calculation is made." @default.
• W2176927932 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2176927932 creator A5011816680 @default.
• W2176927932 creator A5018015217 @default.
• W2176927932 creator A5019080744 @default.
• W2176927932 creator A5036270984 @default.
• W2176927932 creator A5052002978 @default.
• W2176927932 creator A5070763263 @default.
• W2176927932 creator A5075492885 @default.
• W2176927932 date "2015-02-03" @default.
• W2176927932 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2176927932 title "Closed-Loop Feedback Control in Intelligent Wells: Application to a Heterogeneous, Thin Oil-Rim Reservoir in the North Sea" @default.
• W2176927932 cites W1972056502 @default.
• W2176927932 cites W1988729251 @default.
• W2176927932 cites W1995270660 @default.
• W2176927932 cites W1996707465 @default.
• W2176927932 cites W2008361407 @default.
• W2176927932 cites W2012090418 @default.
• W2176927932 cites W2025661756 @default.
• W2176927932 cites W2035109588 @default.
• W2176927932 cites W2041841900 @default.
• W2176927932 cites W2050374027 @default.
• W2176927932 cites W2067201501 @default.
• W2176927932 cites W2067789457 @default.
• W2176927932 cites W2070376369 @default.
• W2176927932 cites W2078405454 @default.
• W2176927932 cites W2093230448 @default.
• W2176927932 cites W2104165931 @default.
• W2176927932 cites W2153063018 @default.
• W2176927932 cites W2200959116 @default.
• W2176927932 cites W4240392144 @default.
• W2176927932 doi "https://doi.org/10.2118/159550-pa" @default.
• W2176927932 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2176927932 type Work @default.
• W2176927932 sameAs 2176927932 @default.
• W2176927932 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2176927932 countsByYear W21769279322015 @default.
• W2176927932 countsByYear W21769279322017 @default.
• W2176927932 countsByYear W21769279322018 @default.
• W2176927932 countsByYear W21769279322019 @default.
• W2176927932 countsByYear W21769279322020 @default.
• W2176927932 countsByYear W21769279322021 @default.
• W2176927932 countsByYear W21769279322022 @default.
• W2176927932 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2176927932 hasAuthorship W2176927932A5011816680 @default.
• W2176927932 hasAuthorship W2176927932A5018015217 @default.
• W2176927932 hasAuthorship W2176927932A5019080744 @default.
• W2176927932 hasAuthorship W2176927932A5036270984 @default.
• W2176927932 hasAuthorship W2176927932A5052002978 @default.
• W2176927932 hasAuthorship W2176927932A5070763263 @default.
• W2176927932 hasAuthorship W2176927932A5075492885 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C111368507 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C14641988 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C153240184 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C172205157 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C25197100 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C2776132308 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C2777038186 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C2777560178 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C2778904306 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C38349280 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C47446073 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C57879066 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C75622301 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C76177295 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConcept C78762247 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C111368507 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C119857082 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C121332964 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C127313418 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C127413603 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C14641988 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C153240184 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C154945302 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C172205157 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C187320778 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C25197100 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C2775924081 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C2776132308 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C2777038186 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C2777560178 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C2778904306 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C38349280 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C41008148 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C47446073 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C57879066 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C75622301 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C76177295 @default.
• W2176927932 hasConceptScore W2176927932C78519656 @default.

• next