FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2177667070> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2177667070 endingPage "296" @default.
• W2177667070 startingPage "295" @default.
• W2177667070 abstract "Researchers and practitioners alike now generally agree that research is a business in and of itself (Freshwater, 2012; Freshwater & Fisher, 2014). More explicitly, as a business, it is intimately linked with achieving excellence that leads to knowledge production. Knowledge production, in turn, is an entrepreneurial activity and one that is now explicitly aligned with the economy of many Western countries (see, e.g., Knowledge Society and the University of Western Australia, 2015; Universities UK, 2014). It is, in essence, both a marker of quality and excellence of the outcomes of research and innovation (knowledge generation), and a means of generating international impact through knowledge production and translation. In addition, estimations of research excellence and international research assessment exercises are becoming increasingly refined, as they endeavor to delineate research excellence through peer review of the international reach, significance, and most recently, the translation and impact of ‘‘world class’’ research (Hare, 2015; Higher Education Funding Council for England, 2014). Research exercises are primarily driven by metric measures of research performance, with indicators of excellence being determined at local, national, and international levels. Measures include research outputs (including, of course, publications in impact factored journals), numbers of postgraduate student completions, and levels of research council income. Other measures refer to the research environment and evaluations of esteem. Let us focus more intensely on the matter of research outputs, citation indices, and impact factors. In 2012, early in my term of office, I wrote about the development of impact measures in research and this with regard to quality thresholds. I also referred to the contested ground of journal impact factors, an inevitable measure of quality and esteem (Freshwater & Cahill, 2012). In this, my final editorial, after serving as co-editor of the Journal of Mixed Methods Research (JMMR) for a term of 4 years, the current team is pleased to announce that the impact factor for JMMR, in 2014, has increased to 2.186, from 1.675 in 2013. This has had the subsequent result of moving the JMMR up the rankings from 9/92 in Social Sciences (Interdisciplinary), to 7/95 in that same category. This is an important measure of not only the quality of the articles published in JMMR, but as importantly, a signal of the diligence, efforts, and high-level assessment of quality, by our reviewers, the associate editors, and the editors. I will say more about the role of editors shortly, for now let me turn to the notion of metrification, and the use of what I have referred to this in journal of algorithmic, or calculative, thinking (Freshwater, 2015). Heidegger once commented that calculative thinking might someday come to be the only way of thinking (Goleman, 2014). The capacity to sustain attention to an ongoing narrative is increasingly becoming the subject of much social science literature. Goleman (2014) writes of the tyranny of continuous partial attention, driven by the disruptive, and some would argue" @default.
• W2177667070 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2177667070 creator A5026371055 @default.
• W2177667070 date "2015-09-18" @default.
• W2177667070 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2177667070 title "Mixed Methods Research" @default.
• W2177667070 cites W2137643431 @default.
• W2177667070 cites W2141993204 @default.
• W2177667070 cites W2324512805 @default.
• W2177667070 cites W2325993517 @default.
• W2177667070 cites W4236525611 @default.
• W2177667070 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815606008" @default.
• W2177667070 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2177667070 type Work @default.
• W2177667070 sameAs 2177667070 @default.
• W2177667070 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2177667070 countsByYear W21776670702017 @default.
• W2177667070 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2177667070 hasAuthorship W2177667070A5026371055 @default.
• W2177667070 hasBestOaLocation W21776670701 @default.
• W2177667070 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2177667070 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2177667070 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W2177667070 hasConcept C156393514 @default.
• W2177667070 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2177667070 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2177667070 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W2177667070 hasConceptScore W2177667070C127413603 @default.
• W2177667070 hasConceptScore W2177667070C144024400 @default.
• W2177667070 hasConceptScore W2177667070C145420912 @default.
• W2177667070 hasConceptScore W2177667070C156393514 @default.
• W2177667070 hasConceptScore W2177667070C15744967 @default.
• W2177667070 hasConceptScore W2177667070C41008148 @default.
• W2177667070 hasConceptScore W2177667070C539667460 @default.
• W2177667070 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2177667070 hasLocation W21776670701 @default.
• W2177667070 hasOpenAccess W2177667070 @default.
• W2177667070 hasPrimaryLocation W21776670701 @default.
• W2177667070 hasRelatedWork W2095425254 @default.
• W2177667070 hasRelatedWork W2098972373 @default.
• W2177667070 hasRelatedWork W2102121765 @default.
• W2177667070 hasRelatedWork W2165101375 @default.
• W2177667070 hasRelatedWork W2169459420 @default.
• W2177667070 hasRelatedWork W217124047 @default.
• W2177667070 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2177667070 hasRelatedWork W2973657702 @default.
• W2177667070 hasRelatedWork W3092207863 @default.
• W2177667070 hasRelatedWork W3130338185 @default.
• W2177667070 hasVolume "9" @default.
• W2177667070 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2177667070 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2177667070 magId "2177667070" @default.
• W2177667070 workType "article" @default.