FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2177692939> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2177692939 endingPage "364" @default.
• W2177692939 startingPage "364" @default.
• W2177692939 abstract "Objectives The aim of the present study was to investigate experiences of staff interactions and non-technical skills (NTS) at rapid response team (RRT) calls, and their association with repeat RRT calls. Methods Mixed-methods surveys were conducted of RRT members and staff who activate the RRT (RRT users) for their perceptions and attitudes regarding the use of NTS during RRT calls. Responses within the survey were recorded as Likert items, ranked data and free comments. The latter were coded into nodes relating to one of four NTS domains: leadership, communication, cooperation and planning. Results Two hundred and ninety-seven (32%) RRT users and 79 (73.8%) RRT members provided responses. Of the RRT user respondents, 76.5% had activated the RRT at some point. Deficits in NTS at RRT calls were revealed, with 36.9% of users not feeling involved during RRT calls and 24.7% of members perceiving that users were disinterested. Unresolved user clinical concerns, or persistence of RRT calling criteria, were reasons cited by 37.6% and 23%, respectively, of RRT users for reactivating an RRT to the same patient. Despite recollections of conflict at previous RRT calls, 92% of users would still reactivate the RRT. The most common theme in the free comments related to deficiencies in cooperation (52.9%), communication (28.6%) and leadership (14.3%). Conclusions This survey of RRT users and members revealed problems with RRT users’ and members’ interactions at the time of an RRT call. Both users and members considered NTS to be important, but lacking. These findings support NTS training for RRT members and users. What is known about the topic? Previous surveying has related experiences of criticism and conflict between clinical staff at RRT activations. This leads to reluctance to call the RRT when indicated, with risks to patient safety, especially if subsequent RRT activation is necessary. Training in NTS has improved clinician interactions in simulated emergencies, but the exact role of NTS during RRT calls has not yet been established. What does this paper add? The present survey examined experienced clinicians’ perceptions of the use of NTS at RRT calls and the effect on subsequent calling. A key finding was a disparity between perceptions of how RRT members interact with those activating the RRT (RRT users) and their performance of NTS. This was reflected with unresolved RRT user clinical concern at the time of a call. In turn, this affected RRT users’ attitudes and intentions to reactivate the RRT. Formal handover was considered desirable by both RRT users and members. What are the implications for practitioners? The interface between the RRT and those who call the RRT is crucial. This survey shows that RRT users desire to be included in the management of the deteriorating patient and have their concerns addressed before completion of RRT attendance. Failure to do so results in repeat activations to the same patient, with the potential for adverse patient outcomes. Training to include NTS, especially around handover, for RRT members may address this issue and should be explored further." @default.
• W2177692939 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2177692939 creator A5033336357 @default.
• W2177692939 creator A5036215690 @default.
• W2177692939 creator A5057925763 @default.
• W2177692939 creator A5061188314 @default.
• W2177692939 date "2016-01-01" @default.
• W2177692939 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2177692939 title "Perceptions of interactions between staff members calling, and those responding to, rapid response team activations for patient deterioration" @default.
• W2177692939 cites W1972083446 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W1996750129 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2006711280 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2007598609 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2007744576 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2009614821 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2023644626 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2024151720 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2039107110 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2042371668 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2047944129 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2067256943 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2070164693 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2093367834 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2102836804 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2113554296 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2114781370 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2117978464 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2155470409 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2158387625 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W2167903104 @default.
• W2177692939 cites W4255827324 @default.
• W2177692939 doi "https://doi.org/10.1071/ah15138" @default.
• W2177692939 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29224610" @default.
• W2177692939 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
• W2177692939 type Work @default.
• W2177692939 sameAs 2177692939 @default.
• W2177692939 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2177692939 countsByYear W21776929392018 @default.
• W2177692939 countsByYear W21776929392019 @default.
• W2177692939 countsByYear W21776929392020 @default.
• W2177692939 countsByYear W21776929392021 @default.
• W2177692939 countsByYear W21776929392022 @default.
• W2177692939 countsByYear W21776929392023 @default.
• W2177692939 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2177692939 hasAuthorship W2177692939A5033336357 @default.
• W2177692939 hasAuthorship W2177692939A5036215690 @default.
• W2177692939 hasAuthorship W2177692939A5057925763 @default.
• W2177692939 hasAuthorship W2177692939A5061188314 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConcept C122980154 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConcept C2910912111 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConceptScore W2177692939C105776082 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConceptScore W2177692939C122980154 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConceptScore W2177692939C138496976 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConceptScore W2177692939C15744967 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConceptScore W2177692939C169760540 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConceptScore W2177692939C26760741 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConceptScore W2177692939C2910912111 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConceptScore W2177692939C512399662 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConceptScore W2177692939C545542383 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConceptScore W2177692939C71924100 @default.
• W2177692939 hasConceptScore W2177692939C77805123 @default.
• W2177692939 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2177692939 hasLocation W21776929391 @default.
• W2177692939 hasLocation W21776929392 @default.
• W2177692939 hasOpenAccess W2177692939 @default.
• W2177692939 hasPrimaryLocation W21776929391 @default.
• W2177692939 hasRelatedWork W1540119434 @default.
• W2177692939 hasRelatedWork W1605660090 @default.
• W2177692939 hasRelatedWork W2071657884 @default.
• W2177692939 hasRelatedWork W213396585 @default.
• W2177692939 hasRelatedWork W2290390358 @default.
• W2177692939 hasRelatedWork W2291261743 @default.
• W2177692939 hasRelatedWork W2358660055 @default.
• W2177692939 hasRelatedWork W2765982327 @default.
• W2177692939 hasRelatedWork W3162248051 @default.
• W2177692939 hasRelatedWork W4285126926 @default.
• W2177692939 hasVolume "40" @default.
• W2177692939 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2177692939 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2177692939 magId "2177692939" @default.
• W2177692939 workType "article" @default.