FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2180718323> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2180718323 endingPage "336" @default.
• W2180718323 startingPage "329" @default.
• W2180718323 abstract "<h3>Background</h3> Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a method of risk assessment increasingly used in healthcare over the past decade. The traditional method, however, can require substantial time and training resources. The goal of this study is to compare a simplified scoring method with the traditional scoring method to determine the degree of congruence in identifying high-risk failures. <h3>Methods</h3> An FMEA of the operating room (OR) to intensive care unit (ICU) handoff was conducted. Failures were scored and ranked using both the traditional risk priority number (RPN) and criticality-based method, and a simplified method, which designates failures as ‘high’, ‘medium’ or ‘low’ risk. The degree of congruence was determined by first identifying those failures determined to be critical by the traditional method (RPN≥300), and then calculating the per cent congruence with those failures designated critical by the simplified methods (high risk). <h3>Results</h3> In total, 79 process failures among 37 individual steps in the OR to ICU handoff process were identified. The traditional method yielded Criticality Indices (CIs) ranging from 18 to 72 and RPNs ranging from 80 to 504. The simplified method ranked 11 failures as ‘low risk’, 30 as medium risk and 22 as high risk. The traditional method yielded 24 failures with an RPN ≥300, of which 22 were identified as high risk by the simplified method (92% agreement). The top 20% of CI (≥60) included 12 failures, of which six were designated as high risk by the simplified method (50% agreement). <h3>Conclusions</h3> These results suggest that the simplified method of scoring and ranking failures identified by an FMEA can be a useful tool for healthcare organisations with limited access to FMEA expertise. However, the simplified method does not result in the same degree of discrimination in the ranking of failures offered by the traditional method." @default.
• W2180718323 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2180718323 creator A5008135666 @default.
• W2180718323 creator A5009781670 @default.
• W2180718323 creator A5029760925 @default.
• W2180718323 creator A5052323923 @default.
• W2180718323 creator A5052800525 @default.
• W2180718323 creator A5067375475 @default.
• W2180718323 date "2015-07-13" @default.
• W2180718323 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2180718323 title "Failure mode and effects analysis: a comparison of two common risk prioritisation methods" @default.
• W2180718323 cites W1437064397 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W1733503225 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W1965740430 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W1975667997 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2000073012 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2004951531 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2005455276 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2006211662 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2010269198 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2016653818 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2022155020 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2030354268 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2031532543 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2041523302 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2049109213 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2056373149 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2059245038 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2065362740 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2089898432 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2090657474 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2098862415 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2127850480 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2133040606 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2156632713 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2156664009 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2323476551 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2324176991 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2327658977 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2334749231 @default.
• W2180718323 cites W2403960136 @default.
• W2180718323 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004130" @default.
• W2180718323 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26170336" @default.
• W2180718323 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2180718323 type Work @default.
• W2180718323 sameAs 2180718323 @default.
• W2180718323 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W2180718323 countsByYear W21807183232015 @default.
• W2180718323 countsByYear W21807183232016 @default.
• W2180718323 countsByYear W21807183232017 @default.
• W2180718323 countsByYear W21807183232018 @default.
• W2180718323 countsByYear W21807183232019 @default.
• W2180718323 countsByYear W21807183232020 @default.
• W2180718323 countsByYear W21807183232021 @default.
• W2180718323 countsByYear W21807183232022 @default.
• W2180718323 countsByYear W21807183232023 @default.
• W2180718323 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2180718323 hasAuthorship W2180718323A5008135666 @default.
• W2180718323 hasAuthorship W2180718323A5009781670 @default.
• W2180718323 hasAuthorship W2180718323A5029760925 @default.
• W2180718323 hasAuthorship W2180718323A5052323923 @default.
• W2180718323 hasAuthorship W2180718323A5052800525 @default.
• W2180718323 hasAuthorship W2180718323A5067375475 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C111852164 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C12174686 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C125611927 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C132074034 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C185544564 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C200601418 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C30098461 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C32896092 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C66283442 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConceptScore W2180718323C111852164 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConceptScore W2180718323C112930515 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConceptScore W2180718323C121332964 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConceptScore W2180718323C12174686 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConceptScore W2180718323C125611927 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConceptScore W2180718323C127413603 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConceptScore W2180718323C132074034 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConceptScore W2180718323C162324750 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConceptScore W2180718323C185544564 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConceptScore W2180718323C187736073 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConceptScore W2180718323C200601418 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConceptScore W2180718323C2524010 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConceptScore W2180718323C30098461 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConceptScore W2180718323C31258907 @default.
• W2180718323 hasConceptScore W2180718323C32896092 @default.

• next