FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2183260260> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2183260260 abstract "this act deplorable, Fields shouted out: “somebody put pineapple juice in my pineapple juice”! 3 Unhappily, something other than that which was reliably expected by Fields was delivered. In that instance, between one’s expectations and what was received, the “law of least astonishment” was violated. The “law of least astonishment” was amusingly made popular by the writings of James Geoffrey 4 in the 80’s, but the concept and practice were part of a mainstream programming practice, more than a decade earlier; 5 during the adolescence of the computing age. What exactly is the “law of least astonishment”? From a reliability point of view, the “law of least astonishment” is a guidepost to designers and programmers of computer interfaces, propagating a ‘mental checks and balances’ archetype, affirmed by the ideal that interfaces should always perform in a manner originally intended, and not in a manner that will astonish (negatively) those ‘interfaced.’ Elsewhere, centuries preceding the birth of the computing industry, professional practitioners In Medicine had to formally subscribe to a set of principles as they entered their practice. The principles embedded within the Hippocratic Oath emphasized that all practitioners of medicine, “do no harm.” Today, from the design of human-machine interfaces in medical informatics, 6 to structuring knowledge distribution enterprises, 7 determining core values of professional management training, 8 deciding policy vectors to widely institutionalize operational stability of the Internet, 9 to the extent that scientists and scientific personnel within enterprises have been stimulated to engage the world 10 from their positions and professions of choice, have all stemmed from a communal, and a very human desire to be wedded to the ‘law of least astonishment,’ or quite simply, to ‘do no harm.’ Explanation of Relationships… Quite naturally, the rule to ‘do no harm’ is not an alien concept to reliability engineers. Reliability engineers are beings that attempt to professionally thwart the rise of nasty surprises. However, as in other disciplines, reliability engineers are not exempt from challenge to operate in complex institutional settings, where professionals from multiple disciplines, must jointly emerge novel inter-disciplinary solutions to decidedly challenging problems. This requirement to interoperate very often introduces the existence of a reliability ‘fault-line’ particularly in large-scale, highly complex and vastly distributed nature of operations. Just recently, an intriguing thought-piece on reliability in terms of interoperability came across my desk, which attempted to analytically synopsize the results of efforts instituted over the past 40 years to improve the reliability of the United States electric power grid. IEEE-USA’s Debra Schiff interviewed the authors, Dr. Luis Kun - Senior Research Professor of Homeland Security at the Information Resource Management College of National Defense University (NDU), and" @default.
• W2183260260 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2183260260 creator A5014643175 @default.
• W2183260260 date "2007-01-01" @default.
• W2183260260 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2183260260 title "Reliability, Law of Least Astonishment and the Interoperability imperative" @default.
• W2183260260 cites W1658306350 @default.
• W2183260260 cites W1976623370 @default.
• W2183260260 cites W2480413023 @default.
• W2183260260 cites W371640706 @default.
• W2183260260 cites W2926660865 @default.
• W2183260260 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2183260260 type Work @default.
• W2183260260 sameAs 2183260260 @default.
• W2183260260 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2183260260 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2183260260 hasAuthorship W2183260260A5014643175 @default.
• W2183260260 hasConcept C125046197 @default.
• W2183260260 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2183260260 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2183260260 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2183260260 hasConcept C2777363581 @default.
• W2183260260 hasConcept C2777617010 @default.
• W2183260260 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2183260260 hasConceptScore W2183260260C125046197 @default.
• W2183260260 hasConceptScore W2183260260C144024400 @default.
• W2183260260 hasConceptScore W2183260260C17744445 @default.
• W2183260260 hasConceptScore W2183260260C199539241 @default.
• W2183260260 hasConceptScore W2183260260C2777363581 @default.
• W2183260260 hasConceptScore W2183260260C2777617010 @default.
• W2183260260 hasConceptScore W2183260260C41008148 @default.
• W2183260260 hasLocation W21832602601 @default.
• W2183260260 hasOpenAccess W2183260260 @default.
• W2183260260 hasPrimaryLocation W21832602601 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W1172266555 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W1502572386 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W1512122291 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W1512796087 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W2029962177 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W2079066417 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W2092371478 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W2282417748 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W2288458500 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W2335718036 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W2346161070 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W2399815 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W2752085253 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W2953600333 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W2992238417 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W3121501920 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W5469850 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W759309333 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W3152050804 @default.
• W2183260260 hasRelatedWork W387112735 @default.
• W2183260260 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2183260260 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2183260260 magId "2183260260" @default.
• W2183260260 workType "article" @default.