FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2183645397> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2183645397 endingPage "3004" @default.
• W2183645397 startingPage "2997" @default.
• W2183645397 abstract "Background: As the demand increases for demonstration of competence in surgical skill, the need for validated assessment tools also increases. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate a dry knee model for the assessment of performance of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The hypothesis was that the combination of a checklist and a previously validated global rating scale would be a valid and reliable means of assessing ACLR when performed by residents in a dry model. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: All residents, sports medicine staff, and fellows were invited to perform a hamstring ACLR using anteromedial drilling and Endobutton fixation on a dry model of an anterior cruciate ligament. Previous exposure to knee arthroscopy and ACLR was recorded. A detailed surgical manuscript and technique video were sent to all participants before the study. Residents were evaluated by staff surgeons with task-specific checklists created by use of a modified Delphi procedure and the Arthroscopic Surgical Skill Evaluation Tool (ASSET). Each procedure (hand movements and arthroscopic video) was recorded and scored by a fellow blinded to the year of training of each participant. Results: A total of 29 residents, 5 fellows, and 6 staff surgeons (40 participants total) performed an ACLR on the dry model. The internal reliability (Cronbach alpha) of the test when using the total ASSET score was very high (>0.9). One-way analysis of variance for the total ASSET score and the total checklist score demonstrated a difference between participants based on year of training ( P < .001). Post hoc analysis demonstrated a significant difference in global ratings and checklist scores between junior residents (postgraduate year [PGY] 1-3) and senior residents (PGY 4 and 5) and senior residents and fellows ( P < .05). A significant difference was seen between fellows and staff on the global rating ( P < .05) but not on the checklist scores ( P > .05). A good correlation was seen between the total ASSET score and prior exposure to knee arthroscopy (0.73) and ACLR (0.65). The interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) between the examiner ratings and the blinded assessor ratings for the total ASSET score was very high (>0.8). Conclusion: The results of this study provide evidence that the performance of an ACLR in a dry model is a reliable method of assessing a resident’s knowledge of the steps and instrumentation required, and the method shows evidence of validity. Clinical Relevance: These models may be used to ensure a minimal level of competence before residents and fellows perform ACLR in the operating room." @default.
• W2183645397 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2183645397 creator A5004273353 @default.
• W2183645397 creator A5008149778 @default.
• W2183645397 creator A5011438512 @default.
• W2183645397 creator A5016619046 @default.
• W2183645397 creator A5043719478 @default.
• W2183645397 creator A5046702075 @default.
• W2183645397 creator A5066675288 @default.
• W2183645397 creator A5078761612 @default.
• W2183645397 creator A5083372423 @default.
• W2183645397 date "2015-10-12" @default.
• W2183645397 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2183645397 title "Simulation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Dry Model" @default.
• W2183645397 cites W1967929908 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W1975691516 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W1976116374 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W1976263109 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W1992642904 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W1993678914 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2000401568 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2004636925 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2009785202 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2012016729 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2014411612 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2014830477 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2016288434 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2017339846 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2018138071 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2021018993 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2035130114 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2047942334 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2052114528 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2075012734 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2115978152 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2126861333 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2154796613 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2247600779 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W2288178512 @default.
• W2183645397 cites W4255599054 @default.
• W2183645397 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515608161" @default.
• W2183645397 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26460098" @default.
• W2183645397 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2183645397 type Work @default.
• W2183645397 sameAs 2183645397 @default.
• W2183645397 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W2183645397 countsByYear W21836453972016 @default.
• W2183645397 countsByYear W21836453972017 @default.
• W2183645397 countsByYear W21836453972018 @default.
• W2183645397 countsByYear W21836453972020 @default.
• W2183645397 countsByYear W21836453972021 @default.
• W2183645397 countsByYear W21836453972022 @default.
• W2183645397 countsByYear W21836453972023 @default.
• W2183645397 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2183645397 hasAuthorship W2183645397A5004273353 @default.
• W2183645397 hasAuthorship W2183645397A5008149778 @default.
• W2183645397 hasAuthorship W2183645397A5011438512 @default.
• W2183645397 hasAuthorship W2183645397A5016619046 @default.
• W2183645397 hasAuthorship W2183645397A5043719478 @default.
• W2183645397 hasAuthorship W2183645397A5046702075 @default.
• W2183645397 hasAuthorship W2183645397A5066675288 @default.
• W2183645397 hasAuthorship W2183645397A5078761612 @default.
• W2183645397 hasAuthorship W2183645397A5083372423 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConcept C2776141760 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConcept C2778434673 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConcept C2779356329 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConcept C2780887989 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConceptScore W2183645397C141071460 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConceptScore W2183645397C15744967 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConceptScore W2183645397C180747234 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConceptScore W2183645397C1862650 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConceptScore W2183645397C2776141760 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConceptScore W2183645397C2778434673 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConceptScore W2183645397C2779356329 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConceptScore W2183645397C2780887989 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConceptScore W2183645397C71924100 @default.
• W2183645397 hasConceptScore W2183645397C99508421 @default.
• W2183645397 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W2183645397 hasLocation W21836453971 @default.
• W2183645397 hasLocation W21836453972 @default.
• W2183645397 hasOpenAccess W2183645397 @default.
• W2183645397 hasPrimaryLocation W21836453971 @default.
• W2183645397 hasRelatedWork W2138515794 @default.
• W2183645397 hasRelatedWork W2256830667 @default.
• W2183645397 hasRelatedWork W2530667695 @default.
• W2183645397 hasRelatedWork W2596072424 @default.
• W2183645397 hasRelatedWork W2768030996 @default.
• W2183645397 hasRelatedWork W2936276270 @default.
• W2183645397 hasRelatedWork W3117905501 @default.
• W2183645397 hasRelatedWork W4294844901 @default.
• W2183645397 hasRelatedWork W4296745034 @default.
• W2183645397 hasRelatedWork W4297538799 @default.

• next