FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2183675522> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2183675522 abstract "This article argues that there has been increasing inaccuracy in defining the concept of “conflict management”. The term has been given a far narrower meaning than it deserves. Historically, it has been understood to mean the containment or suspension of a conflict. The linguistic and conceptual meanings of “management” in disciplines such as “business management” are much wider than the conventional meaning of the term in conflict studies. Conflict management covers every action taken by the parties to the conflict to handle the situation. Therefore, the definition of the term should be extended to cover a whole discipline, which includes the initiation of a conflict, its escalation, the ensuing complications, containment, resolution and transformation as sub-topics. Introduction The end of the Cold War brought a new momentum to the study of conflict management. One of the main reasons for this was the proliferation of violent conflicts in regions such as Eastern Europe. The level of domestic ethnic conflicts, as well as of ethnic conflicts between communities and neighbouring states, attracted much interest among researchers. The momentum stimulated the development of the theoretical framework of conflict studies and, in particular, the conceptual framework. Criticism has been 1 According to David Garnham, some evidence suggests that the world has become more secure. He quotes statistics showing that since the last year of the Cold War, the number of major armed conflicts causing more than 1,000 fatalities has declined steadily from 36 in 1989 to 32 in 1991, 30 in 1995, 27 in 1996, and 25 in 1997. See, David Garnham, Studies in International Conflict and Crisis Management (Abu Dhabi: The Emirates Center for Strategic Studies and Research, Emirates Lectures Series, 25, 2000), p.1. 2 Hamad, Ahmad, Azem, “The Reconceptualisation of Conflict Management”, Peace, Conflict and Development: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol. 7, July 2005, available from http://www.peacestudiesjournal.org.uk. growing regarding the methods used in handling conflict. Assertions have been made that many of the researchers and consultants who advise the decision-makers on handling conflict lack the background of theoretical and scientific methodology. Several proposals have been made to devise new concepts and methods for studying conflict. I shall argue in this article that a large part of the problem with what is known as “conflict studies” stems not only from the lack of appropriate concepts, but also from the definition of some basic concepts in the field. Inaccuracy in defining concepts has led, in turn, to problems in the methodology of studying and handling conflict. This study argues that there has been inaccuracy in defining the concept of conflict management. I believe that the concept has been given a far narrower meaning than it deserves. A more comprehensive definition would cover the study of the various dimensions of the conflict. Indeed, it could describe a whole discipline, in which conflict resolution, transformation and prevention, along with other handling patterns such as escalation, complication and initiation, would be sub-topics within the wider frame of conflict management. It would encompass understanding, containment, settlement, resolution, transformation, and other associated concepts and theories of conflict. To present my argument, I have divided my research into four sections: 1. The conventional meaning of conflict management. 2. Criticism of the concept of conflict management. 3. Retrospection in the development of the concept. 4. Conclusion: reconceptualisation of conflict management." @default.
• W2183675522 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2183675522 creator A5036626221 @default.
• W2183675522 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W2183675522 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2183675522 title "The reconceptualisation of conflict management" @default.
• W2183675522 cites W1492914799 @default.
• W2183675522 cites W1500225526 @default.
• W2183675522 cites W1535592365 @default.
• W2183675522 cites W1583986518 @default.
• W2183675522 cites W1605580508 @default.
• W2183675522 cites W1999617133 @default.
• W2183675522 cites W2051561333 @default.
• W2183675522 cites W2055162760 @default.
• W2183675522 cites W2313754824 @default.
• W2183675522 cites W417141623 @default.
• W2183675522 cites W574916204 @default.
• W2183675522 cites W583978563 @default.
• W2183675522 cites W596614564 @default.
• W2183675522 cites W606872163 @default.
• W2183675522 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2183675522 type Work @default.
• W2183675522 sameAs 2183675522 @default.
• W2183675522 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2183675522 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2183675522 hasAuthorship W2183675522A5036626221 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConcept C118084267 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConcept C14224292 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConcept C201670107 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConcept C21711469 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConcept C2779683958 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConcept C2780791683 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConcept C7991579 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConceptScore W2183675522C111472728 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConceptScore W2183675522C118084267 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConceptScore W2183675522C121332964 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConceptScore W2183675522C138885662 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConceptScore W2183675522C14224292 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConceptScore W2183675522C144024400 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConceptScore W2183675522C162324750 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConceptScore W2183675522C17744445 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConceptScore W2183675522C199539241 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConceptScore W2183675522C201670107 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConceptScore W2183675522C21711469 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConceptScore W2183675522C2779683958 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConceptScore W2183675522C2780791683 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConceptScore W2183675522C2780876879 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConceptScore W2183675522C36289849 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConceptScore W2183675522C62520636 @default.
• W2183675522 hasConceptScore W2183675522C7991579 @default.
• W2183675522 hasLocation W21836755221 @default.
• W2183675522 hasOpenAccess W2183675522 @default.
• W2183675522 hasPrimaryLocation W21836755221 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W137182519 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W1584510520 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W1818613183 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W1975041972 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W1999617133 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W2013630458 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W2105474955 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W2122128111 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W2125217058 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W2131747402 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W2151239931 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W2406549532 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W2469128975 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W2585745368 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W2603527096 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W2948826323 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W2951298114 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W3159419041 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W629514192 @default.
• W2183675522 hasRelatedWork W779891568 @default.
• W2183675522 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2183675522 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2183675522 magId "2183675522" @default.
• W2183675522 workType "article" @default.