FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2183678104> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2183678104 endingPage "122" @default.
• W2183678104 startingPage "116" @default.
• W2183678104 abstract "other words, they [pets] make us feel betted--Sable, 2013, p. 94. Tony Treanor, Director of Human Resources at Northwestern Counseling & Support Services (NCSS), was faced with making an important policy decision. Employees at his Vermont-based nonprofit human services agency wanted to bring to work. At different times clients and staff have wanted to bring pets into our facilities, he said. Treanor, a pet owner himself, was open to the idea but was concerned about the consequences of allowing in the workplace. For example, would all employees and clients welcome at NCSS? How would people who fear or are allergic to react to in the workplace? NCSS currently didn't have a written policy addressing the issue. We do not have a policy but, as a rule, we allow pets in the workplace, Treanor noted. That is by choice with us so that we can bend as we may need or want to. Treanor added that employees had, on occasion, brought a new puppy or dog to work if they had a veterinary appointment during the workday. Confounding the issue was that service had long been permitted at NCSS. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) required that service be permitted where the public is allowed. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) defines service as dogs that are individually trained to do work or perform tasks for people with disabilities (ADA Requirements, 2011). DOJ guidelines made a distinction between service and pets characterizing service as trained working animals that provided a service not merely comfort or emotional support. Should Treanor continue with no official policy, adopt a policy permitting dogs, or should he adopt a written policy prohibiting them? Should he maintain the current distinction between service and pets? Adopting an informal don't ask, tell policy on at work was also an option. Concerned with maintaining good employee morale, Treanor researched the issue of in the workplace in order to make a recommendation to members of the NCSS leadership team. Northwestern Counseling & Support Services Founded in 1958, NCSS was a private nonprofit human services agency whose mission was to ensure that the residents of Franklin and Grand Isle Counties have access to high quality services, which promote healthy living and emotional well-being (Northwestern, 2015). NCSS provided over 75 community mental health programs to children, adolescents, and adults in Northwestern Vermont near Lake Champlain and the Canadian border. These programs were designed to help Vermonters with behavioral or emotional problems; mental and/or developmental disabilities; autism; and substance abuse problems. Services were provided in schools, homes, at a family center in St. Albans, Vermont, and at a parent-child center in Alburg, Vermont. The agency's administrative offices were located in St. Albans. NCSS was accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF), an independent accreditor of health and human service agencies. In fiscal year 2013, NCSS had a budget of $32 million and had 505 employees-300 of which worked off site in the community. NCSS's budget was spent on Developmental Services (41%); Children, Youth and Family Services (39%); Adult Behavioral Services (16%); Crisis Services (4%); and Administration ( Pet Ownership Americans love pets. In 2012, sixty-two percent of U.S. households (164 million) had at least one pet. Forty-seven percent had at least one dog while 46% had at least one cat (Humane Society, 2013). Additionally, Herzog (2010) reported that in 2009, Americans shared their homes with 15 million birds, 14 million reptiles, 16 million small mammals, and 180 million fish. …" @default.
• W2183678104 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2183678104 creator A5078368575 @default.
• W2183678104 date "2015-11-15" @default.
• W2183678104 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2183678104 title "See Spot Run? The Dogs in the Workplace Debate" @default.
• W2183678104 cites W2023057033 @default.
• W2183678104 cites W2033116908 @default.
• W2183678104 cites W2078597179 @default.
• W2183678104 cites W2100680563 @default.
• W2183678104 cites W2488490970 @default.
• W2183678104 cites W2497383455 @default.
• W2183678104 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2183678104 type Work @default.
• W2183678104 sameAs 2183678104 @default.
• W2183678104 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2183678104 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2183678104 hasAuthorship W2183678104A5078368575 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConcept C181907467 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConcept C2778726489 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConcept C2780378061 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConceptScore W2183678104C108170787 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConceptScore W2183678104C127413603 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConceptScore W2183678104C139621336 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConceptScore W2183678104C144024400 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConceptScore W2183678104C144133560 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConceptScore W2183678104C15744967 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConceptScore W2183678104C162853370 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConceptScore W2183678104C17744445 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConceptScore W2183678104C181907467 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConceptScore W2183678104C18762648 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConceptScore W2183678104C18903297 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConceptScore W2183678104C199539241 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConceptScore W2183678104C2778726489 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConceptScore W2183678104C2780378061 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConceptScore W2183678104C36289849 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConceptScore W2183678104C39549134 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConceptScore W2183678104C78519656 @default.
• W2183678104 hasConceptScore W2183678104C86803240 @default.
• W2183678104 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2183678104 hasLocation W21836781041 @default.
• W2183678104 hasOpenAccess W2183678104 @default.
• W2183678104 hasPrimaryLocation W21836781041 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W13393285 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W1569152157 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W1964675928 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W1998224839 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W2009611600 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W2015792352 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W2087503858 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W2094229403 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W2124977650 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W2160769820 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W2184750065 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W219046316 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W229371785 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W2294871989 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W2331574510 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W238366342 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W245949722 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W2504770403 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W3207005540 @default.
• W2183678104 hasRelatedWork W329213528 @default.
• W2183678104 hasVolume "33" @default.
• W2183678104 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2183678104 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2183678104 magId "2183678104" @default.
• W2183678104 workType "article" @default.