FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2185048759> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2185048759 abstract "1. The basic idea At the end of the 19 th century several French scholars noted that a remarkable change was taking place in the population of their country. The number of children per family declined, clearly as the result of deliberate efforts to reduce fertility within marriage. It was soon understood that the voluntary limitation of marital fertility was a revolutionary novelty and the term 'demographic revolution' was, in fact, the original term used to describe it. Efforts to explain what was happening began almost immediately. Interestingly enough these first explanations assumed the phenomenon reflected what people wanted out of life. Dumont (1890:130) argued that the desire to be upwardly mobile was the root cause. When climbing the social ladder having a large family would be, no doubt, a hindrance. Dumont concluded that, as a result, the birth rate would decline as social mobility increased. Other French authors, such as Leroy-Beaulieu (1896) and Landry (1909) attributed it to changes in the moral order. Towards the end of the Second World War, and also after it, American scholars took de lead in the discussions about the demographic changes that were taking place. As a result the explanations preferred became more economic in nature and the term 'transition' replaced the term revolution. The changes in demographic behaviour were considered to be mainly a function of progress in society (Kirk, 1944:28). Notestein (1945), who played a crucial part in the formulation of the demographic transition theory, stressed the overriding importance of mortality decline and the impact of the modernization process in people's lives and in society as a whole. He concluded that the demographic transition was likely to be a universal phenomenon; all countries were bound to pass through it once they had achieved the level of development required. It was understood by all knowledgeable people that the decline in fertility was an adjustment made necessary by the decline in mortality. The latter had resulted in unsustainably high levels of natural population growth. The long-term demographic balance had been upset; consequently a new balance had to be established at low levels of both mortality and fertility. The very appealing assumption was that we would move from one long-term quasi- equilibrium to another. As Bongaarts recently stated in a paper (2001:260): 'If fertility in contemporary post-transitional societies had indeed levelled off at or near the replacement level, there would have been limited interest in the subject because this would have been expected.' He then continues as follows: 'However, fertility has dropped below the replacement level -sometimes by a substantial margin- in virtually every population that has moved through the demographic transition. If future fertility remains at these low levels, population will decline in size and age rapidly.' The basic idea behind the concept of the Second Demographic Transition as launched in 1986 is that industrialized countries have indeed reached a new stage in their demographic" @default.
• W2185048759 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2185048759 creator A5011233947 @default.
• W2185048759 date "2002-01-01" @default.
• W2185048759 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2185048759 title "The Idea of a Second Demographic Transition in Industrialized Countries" @default.
• W2185048759 cites W143512335 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W1484021421 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W1523750156 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W1553158282 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W1595752585 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W189830498 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W1918877908 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W1971334151 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W1985010975 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W1991441598 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2007550880 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2032197438 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2038872796 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2045668377 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2053199086 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2058963296 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2061435220 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2064118423 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2108221308 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2140166193 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2203867857 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2279339748 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2316299365 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2321368448 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2325906001 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2757648933 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2798721215 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W3148657029 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W3149937860 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W368654802 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W59608586 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W617897245 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W63025791 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W650277676 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W66822483 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W67920356 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W9879392 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W9880170 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W1720802149 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2277756688 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2607999192 @default.
• W2185048759 cites W2728240565 @default.
• W2185048759 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2185048759 type Work @default.
• W2185048759 sameAs 2185048759 @default.
• W2185048759 citedByCount "64" @default.
• W2185048759 countsByYear W21850487592012 @default.
• W2185048759 countsByYear W21850487592013 @default.
• W2185048759 countsByYear W21850487592014 @default.
• W2185048759 countsByYear W21850487592015 @default.
• W2185048759 countsByYear W21850487592016 @default.
• W2185048759 countsByYear W21850487592017 @default.
• W2185048759 countsByYear W21850487592018 @default.
• W2185048759 countsByYear W21850487592019 @default.
• W2185048759 countsByYear W21850487592020 @default.
• W2185048759 countsByYear W21850487592021 @default.
• W2185048759 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2185048759 hasAuthorship W2185048759A5011233947 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConcept C143845886 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConcept C160050368 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConcept C2779527642 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConcept C37512671 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConcept C4249254 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConcept C47768531 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConcept C518429986 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConcept C554144382 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConceptScore W2185048759C143845886 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConceptScore W2185048759C144024400 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConceptScore W2185048759C149923435 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConceptScore W2185048759C160050368 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConceptScore W2185048759C162324750 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConceptScore W2185048759C17744445 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConceptScore W2185048759C2779527642 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConceptScore W2185048759C2908647359 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConceptScore W2185048759C37512671 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConceptScore W2185048759C4249254 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConceptScore W2185048759C47768531 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConceptScore W2185048759C518429986 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConceptScore W2185048759C52119013 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConceptScore W2185048759C554144382 @default.
• W2185048759 hasConceptScore W2185048759C95457728 @default.
• W2185048759 hasLocation W21850487591 @default.
• W2185048759 hasOpenAccess W2185048759 @default.
• W2185048759 hasPrimaryLocation W21850487591 @default.
• W2185048759 hasRelatedWork W1556057683 @default.
• W2185048759 hasRelatedWork W1655761341 @default.
• W2185048759 hasRelatedWork W1721492040 @default.

• next