FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2186303671> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2186303671 abstract "The growth of information and communication technologies (ICTs) and the emerging needs of higher education students have emphasised the need to incorporate digital developments into learning and teaching activities. ICTs afford innovative and active engagement of the learner, recognise good teaching and promote lifelong learning. On the other hand, there are considerable challenges associated with implementing and integrating ICTs in course environments as academics and institutions struggle to keep abreast of rapidly evolving technologies and pedagogies, thereby wrestling with these emerging technologies and often wrangling to ensure that they support learning and teaching strategies directly and effectively. This paper reports on the incorporation of a comprehensive peer review system into a course within a Faculty of Business and Law at an Australian university, and the experiences, challenges and issues faced by academics with regard to integrating technologies with teaching, learning and assessment practices and outcomes. The peer review approaches reported in the paper first featured in a postgraduate level course and incorporate a peer review system, a course management system, an electronic assessment management system, electronic discussions and a feedback system, which are provided in conjunction with the traditional mode of teaching. After successfully running the course for two years, the course team won a grant to extend its development. The peer review system was developed and trialled within the faculty, focusing on the blended learning environment across the wide range of disciplines and contexts within the faculty. The findings showed that the systems were successful at incorporating a combination of simulative and formative assessment items. While there were challenges about trust, quality and independence, they were minimised through a structured, peer review approach and moderation process. Participants acknowledged that the blended learning environment was challenging and complex; however, learning and teaching in this environment were effective and efficient. Another challenge in developing such a strategy was the requirement to accommodate a wide range of teaching and assessment practices adopted by a large number of academics. It was concluded that blended learning can be innovative and effective, thereby reaping the rewards of wrestling and wrangling with the associated emergent ICTs, but that it requires careful management on the part of academics and a change in student attitude if the potential rewards of academics" @default.
• W2186303671 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2186303671 creator A5005355826 @default.
• W2186303671 creator A5067004734 @default.
• W2186303671 creator A5067581909 @default.
• W2186303671 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W2186303671 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2186303671 title "Challenges and Opportunities for Academics Adopting an Online Peer Review Teaching Model" @default.
• W2186303671 cites W125733476 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W1488581027 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W170694066 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W1964624836 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W1968561821 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W1969641600 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W1997652138 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2007647465 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2008528123 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2010963628 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2018119962 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2023655891 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2027481547 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2029977810 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2061246436 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2071436134 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2084773745 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2085592690 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2095191533 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2106856654 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2110428344 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2122954012 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2129574052 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2146984243 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2152587505 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2158059346 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2162870238 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2166484189 @default.
• W2186303671 cites W2216949479 @default.
• W2186303671 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2186303671 type Work @default.
• W2186303671 sameAs 2186303671 @default.
• W2186303671 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2186303671 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2186303671 hasAuthorship W2186303671A5005355826 @default.
• W2186303671 hasAuthorship W2186303671A5067004734 @default.
• W2186303671 hasAuthorship W2186303671A5067581909 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConcept C108771440 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConcept C110354214 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConcept C2779114481 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConcept C42525527 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConcept C49774154 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConceptScore W2186303671C108771440 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConceptScore W2186303671C110354214 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConceptScore W2186303671C120912362 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConceptScore W2186303671C127413603 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConceptScore W2186303671C144024400 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConceptScore W2186303671C17744445 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConceptScore W2186303671C19417346 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConceptScore W2186303671C199539241 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConceptScore W2186303671C2779114481 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConceptScore W2186303671C41008148 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConceptScore W2186303671C42525527 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConceptScore W2186303671C49774154 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConceptScore W2186303671C55587333 @default.
• W2186303671 hasConceptScore W2186303671C56739046 @default.
• W2186303671 hasLocation W21863036711 @default.
• W2186303671 hasOpenAccess W2186303671 @default.
• W2186303671 hasPrimaryLocation W21863036711 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W1517201160 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W1574069377 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W2007533449 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W2097179383 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W2120047685 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W2593625278 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W2741778887 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W2774863349 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W2789381807 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W2978157795 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W2997005842 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W3110813713 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W3131877524 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W3148690244 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W3203653059 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W412132566 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W636772512 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W2144140193 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W2911987552 @default.
• W2186303671 hasRelatedWork W568887735 @default.
• W2186303671 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2186303671 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2186303671 magId "2186303671" @default.
• W2186303671 workType "article" @default.