FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2186546543> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2186546543 abstract "Patient perception on physician practice while prescribing for radiology examination .our objectives is to assess the patient perception of physician practice and to assess the patient’s perception on radiologic examination. The study was conducted from February 2014 to April 2014 in South Kanara District of Karnataka (rural 65.2%, n-326 and urban 34.8%, n-174). The patient referred from the department of orthopedists and medicine to the radiology department are considered for the study. The selections of the patients are based on the convenience sample. The prospective study design approach was considered for the study. In this study i had developed 15 items forming two domains using frequency four point scales with nine items and Likert five point scales with six items, to assess the patient perception of physician practice and the patient perception on radiologic examination.to analysis the data obtained from our questionnaire study we considered the descriptive static analysis and Pearson chi square test. The descriptive static analysis used to analysis the demographic chart of the patient and items. The Pearson chi square test was used to determine the association between the (a) educations of the patient and radiation awareness, (b) previous radiology examination and knowledge about radiation, (c) previous radiology examination and protective device used in radiology examination, (d) previous radiology examination and signage’s used in radiology department. The outcome of our study shows that referring physician follows poor justification ofpractice. The majority of the physicians (75.0%) do not explain the importance of radiology examination to the patient. Only 1.2% of research population had agreed that the referring physician always explains or discuss the relevance of radiology examination prescribed to the diagnosis of the patient specific condition.The majority of the research population had reported that referring physician does not explain the risk (91.4%) and benefit (87.4%) associated with the radiology examination were radiation is used. Minority of research population had strongly agreed that they were comfortable when referring doctors informing about the risk (12.6%) and benefit (11.6%) from radiology examination. The most interesting outcome of the study shows that 88.2% of the referring physician never resists the patient wish to undergo the radiology examination when it is not necessary. In present study there is a poor communication between the medical practitioner and patient while prescribing for the radiology examination. The outcome of the study also shows that Patient who were undergoing the radiology examination had poor knowledge about the radiation and get very less or no information about the benefit, risk and dose involved in radiologic examination from the prescribed doctors." @default.
• W2186546543 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2186546543 creator A5022732735 @default.
• W2186546543 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W2186546543 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2186546543 title "Patient perception on physician practice while prescribing for radiology examination" @default.
• W2186546543 cites W1964701434 @default.
• W2186546543 cites W2029372003 @default.
• W2186546543 cites W2039535959 @default.
• W2186546543 cites W2051110932 @default.
• W2186546543 cites W2080022029 @default.
• W2186546543 cites W2085579159 @default.
• W2186546543 cites W2118604851 @default.
• W2186546543 cites W2128289784 @default.
• W2186546543 cites W2132511845 @default.
• W2186546543 cites W2134492669 @default.
• W2186546543 cites W2145484750 @default.
• W2186546543 cites W2165438891 @default.
• W2186546543 cites W2171465583 @default.
• W2186546543 cites W2171696073 @default.
• W2186546543 cites W2335809121 @default.
• W2186546543 cites W56001887 @default.
• W2186546543 cites W1488445635 @default.
• W2186546543 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2186546543 type Work @default.
• W2186546543 sameAs 2186546543 @default.
• W2186546543 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2186546543 countsByYear W21865465432016 @default.
• W2186546543 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2186546543 hasAuthorship W2186546543A5022732735 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConcept C32809988 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConcept C39896193 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConcept C527108885 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConceptScore W2186546543C105776082 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConceptScore W2186546543C105795698 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConceptScore W2186546543C126838900 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConceptScore W2186546543C138496976 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConceptScore W2186546543C151730666 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConceptScore W2186546543C15744967 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConceptScore W2186546543C169760540 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConceptScore W2186546543C26760741 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConceptScore W2186546543C2777267654 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConceptScore W2186546543C32809988 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConceptScore W2186546543C33923547 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConceptScore W2186546543C39896193 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConceptScore W2186546543C512399662 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConceptScore W2186546543C527108885 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConceptScore W2186546543C71924100 @default.
• W2186546543 hasConceptScore W2186546543C86803240 @default.
• W2186546543 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2186546543 hasLocation W21865465431 @default.
• W2186546543 hasOpenAccess W2186546543 @default.
• W2186546543 hasPrimaryLocation W21865465431 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W1488191094 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W1989961189 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W2009755811 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W2038496295 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W2044203246 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W2053969929 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W2066090768 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W2080674991 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W2116911260 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W2139713880 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W2149748498 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W2163127798 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W2170004089 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W2494800865 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W2522456249 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W2606609760 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W2753755243 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W2784276969 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W2920979426 @default.
• W2186546543 hasRelatedWork W2131606981 @default.
• W2186546543 hasVolume "6" @default.
• W2186546543 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2186546543 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2186546543 magId "2186546543" @default.
• W2186546543 workType "article" @default.