FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2186927557> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2186927557 endingPage "30" @default.
• W2186927557 startingPage "26" @default.
• W2186927557 abstract "The problem of mesothelial cell injury derived from the use of peritoneal dialysis solutions has been explored deeply. Conversely, the eventual detrimental effects upon mesothelial cell regeneration have awaked less investigative efforts than those focused on injury.To evaluate in the in vivo and in situ rat doughnut model of mesothelial repopulation, the eventual effect of peritoneal lavage with Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) as well as that of 4.25% glucose and 7.5% icodextrin dialysis solutions.100 Sprague-Dawley albino rats were included in the study. Animals were divided into five groups of 20 rats each: group 1: control at zero time; group 2: sham-injected rats; group 3: rats exposed to HBSS; group 4: rats treated with 4.25% glucose peritoneal dialysis solution; group 5: rats injected with 7.5% icodextrin.Selective exfoliation of a ring of mesothelium (width 0.8 mm, diameter 4 mm) covering the anterior surface of the liver was performed in 80 animals. The control zero-time group was used to evaluate the normal density distribution of the mesothelial cells forming the monolayer. The other groups were treated by means of daily sham injections or intraperitoneal infusion of each experimental solution for a period of 30 consecutive days. After a recovery period of 15 days, imprints and biopsies from the monolayer covering the exfoliated area were taken and processed for light microscopy.Macroscopic observation of the abdominal cavity at the end of the 15-day recovery period showed that the prevalence of fibrotic adhesions between the peritoneal exfoliated area and the neighboring diaphragm was 10% forthe sham-injected group, 5% for the HBSS-exposed animals, 85% for the rats injected with 4.25% glucose, and 95% for the icodextrin-treated group. Prevalence of fibrous adhesions in sham-injected animals and rats exposed to HBSS were devoid of statistically significant differences. Conversely, comparison of these groups with results observed in animals treated with the osmotic agents was significant, at the p < 0.0039 level. Regarding density distribution of mesothelial cells observed in imprints, there were no significant differences between the control zero-time and the sham-injected group. This parameter was marginally lower (p < 0.05) in the HBSS-treated rats. Imprints were not taken from animals exposed to glucose or icodextrin because a dense layer of connective tissue replaced the exfoliated mesothelial area.Observations made in this study support the contention that both osmotic agents, 4.25% glucose and 7.5% icodextrin, substantially restrain the normal process of mesothelial cell repopulation and induce repair by means of connective tissue. The underlying mechanism is most likely sustained oxidative stress." @default.
• W2186927557 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2186927557 creator A5011676383 @default.
• W2186927557 creator A5026746074 @default.
• W2186927557 creator A5086179231 @default.
• W2186927557 date "2005-02-01" @default.
• W2186927557 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2186927557 title "Osmotic Agents Hamper Mesothelial Repopulation as Seen in the Doughnut<i>In Vivo</i>Model" @default.
• W2186927557 cites W1488288160 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W1760745268 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W1971420250 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W1973470084 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W1975841830 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W1976457488 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W1982470672 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W1991272197 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W2010148672 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W2011637409 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W2017280929 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W2065673760 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W2071792075 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W2094426086 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W2114377281 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W2145199690 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W2147984242 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W2340682711 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W2387510351 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W3164668873 @default.
• W2186927557 cites W4238450584 @default.
• W2186927557 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/089686080502503s07" @default.
• W2186927557 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16048251" @default.
• W2186927557 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2186927557 type Work @default.
• W2186927557 sameAs 2186927557 @default.
• W2186927557 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W2186927557 countsByYear W21869275572012 @default.
• W2186927557 countsByYear W21869275572013 @default.
• W2186927557 countsByYear W21869275572016 @default.
• W2186927557 countsByYear W21869275572019 @default.
• W2186927557 countsByYear W21869275572021 @default.
• W2186927557 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2186927557 hasAuthorship W2186927557A5011676383 @default.
• W2186927557 hasAuthorship W2186927557A5026746074 @default.
• W2186927557 hasAuthorship W2186927557A5086179231 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C150903083 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C16685009 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C207001950 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C2776001837 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C2777397205 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C2778536324 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C2778996431 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C2779056158 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C2779747549 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C2780159080 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C2780936613 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C2781148755 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C2909640154 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C126322002 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C126894567 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C141071460 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C142724271 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C150903083 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C16685009 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C178790620 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C185592680 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C207001950 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C2776001837 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C2777397205 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C2778536324 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C2778996431 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C2779056158 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C2779747549 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C2780159080 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C2780936613 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C2781148755 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C2909640154 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C71924100 @default.
• W2186927557 hasConceptScore W2186927557C86803240 @default.
• W2186927557 hasIssue "3_suppl" @default.
• W2186927557 hasLocation W21869275571 @default.
• W2186927557 hasLocation W21869275572 @default.
• W2186927557 hasOpenAccess W2186927557 @default.
• W2186927557 hasPrimaryLocation W21869275571 @default.
• W2186927557 hasRelatedWork W185477547 @default.
• W2186927557 hasRelatedWork W2049210073 @default.
• W2186927557 hasRelatedWork W2144523957 @default.
• W2186927557 hasRelatedWork W2181871794 @default.
• W2186927557 hasRelatedWork W2186927557 @default.
• W2186927557 hasRelatedWork W2203378659 @default.
• W2186927557 hasRelatedWork W2260979738 @default.

• next