FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2187582152> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2187582152 endingPage "71" @default.
• W2187582152 startingPage "53" @default.
• W2187582152 abstract "Purpose – A major limitation in cross-cultural research continues to be attempts to compare construct measurements across cultures without adequate conceptual and empirical evidence of the equivalency of the measurement scores. Of significant concern in such studies is the presence of various types of response bias that may systematically differ from one culture to another, resulting in a potential violation of the assumption that measurement scores across cultures are equivalent. The focus of this study is to investigate the role of the response format type, extreme response style (ERS). Most studies have investigated response bias styles using Likert-type scales as response formats, yet it has long been argued that these particular formats tend to result in various types of response style bias, especially in cross-cultural research. Would other scaling devices, such as semantic differential (SD), lessen response style bias in pan-cultural studies? To answer this question, our study employs two types of response formats (i.e., Liker-type and SD) to empirically test for the presence of ERS within each response format style.Methodology/approach – This chapter takes the form of empirical research using ERS indices to test for the degree of ERS between response formats using samples from a collectivistic culture (i.e., South Korea) and an individualistic culture (i.e., United States).Findings – Results show that samples from both cultures exhibit greater levels of ERS when using Likert-type scales compared to SD scales. Additionally, this study finds that, when using Likert-type scales, ERS is greater for U.S. respondents than for South Korea respondents. Finally, results show that there is no statistically significant difference in ERS between the two cultural groups when using SD response formats.Research implications – Findings show that the use of SD response formats eliminates systematic differences in ERS between a collectivist sample and an individualist sample. Therefore, the use of such response formats in future cross-cultural research can greatly diminish the problematic effects of culturally based ERS and lead to greater confidence in the equivalency of measurement scores across cultures.Originality/value of paper – This study is the first to simultaneously assess culturally based ERS using two types of response formats to investigate the impact of response format on ERS. Furthermore, this study assesses the role of response format on ERS both within and between two distinctly different cultures." @default.
• W2187582152 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2187582152 creator A5040566539 @default.
• W2187582152 creator A5053369032 @default.
• W2187582152 creator A5063696813 @default.
• W2187582152 creator A5085890274 @default.
• W2187582152 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W2187582152 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2187582152 title "The Role of Response Formats on Extreme Response Style: A Case of Likert-Type vs. Semantic Differential Scales" @default.
• W2187582152 cites W1486839280 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W1897007643 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W1965685537 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W1971753067 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W1972655304 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W1985482022 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W1994760139 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W1998970255 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2000312273 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2009884587 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2018126168 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2021616958 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2034178275 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2040825146 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2050112305 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2055684847 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2064683297 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2065429616 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2073635657 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2095762164 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2100914198 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2101654432 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2108806381 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2112472109 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2121203072 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2123901740 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2133087357 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2141960018 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2147472338 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2149498473 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2165018471 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2171864614 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2318975446 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2324693856 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2328234520 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2335599196 @default.
• W2187582152 cites W2902743864 @default.
• W2187582152 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/s1474-7979(2011)0000022006" @default.
• W2187582152 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2187582152 type Work @default.
• W2187582152 sameAs 2187582152 @default.
• W2187582152 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2187582152 countsByYear W21875821522013 @default.
• W2187582152 countsByYear W21875821522015 @default.
• W2187582152 countsByYear W21875821522017 @default.
• W2187582152 countsByYear W21875821522018 @default.
• W2187582152 countsByYear W21875821522019 @default.
• W2187582152 countsByYear W21875821522022 @default.
• W2187582152 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W2187582152 hasAuthorship W2187582152A5040566539 @default.
• W2187582152 hasAuthorship W2187582152A5053369032 @default.
• W2187582152 hasAuthorship W2187582152A5063696813 @default.
• W2187582152 hasAuthorship W2187582152A5085890274 @default.
• W2187582152 hasConcept C105776082 @default.
• W2187582152 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
• W2187582152 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2187582152 hasConcept C159447121 @default.
• W2187582152 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2187582152 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2187582152 hasConcept C2776445246 @default.
• W2187582152 hasConcept C43020497 @default.
• W2187582152 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2187582152 hasConceptScore W2187582152C105776082 @default.
• W2187582152 hasConceptScore W2187582152C138496976 @default.
• W2187582152 hasConceptScore W2187582152C15744967 @default.
• W2187582152 hasConceptScore W2187582152C159447121 @default.
• W2187582152 hasConceptScore W2187582152C166957645 @default.
• W2187582152 hasConceptScore W2187582152C205649164 @default.
• W2187582152 hasConceptScore W2187582152C2776445246 @default.
• W2187582152 hasConceptScore W2187582152C43020497 @default.
• W2187582152 hasConceptScore W2187582152C77805123 @default.
• W2187582152 hasLocation W21875821521 @default.
• W2187582152 hasOpenAccess W2187582152 @default.
• W2187582152 hasPrimaryLocation W21875821521 @default.
• W2187582152 hasRelatedWork W1547399853 @default.
• W2187582152 hasRelatedWork W1582765793 @default.
• W2187582152 hasRelatedWork W1988185375 @default.
• W2187582152 hasRelatedWork W1988471354 @default.
• W2187582152 hasRelatedWork W1996318672 @default.
• W2187582152 hasRelatedWork W2117225191 @default.
• W2187582152 hasRelatedWork W2355748453 @default.
• W2187582152 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2187582152 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2187582152 hasRelatedWork W4231557569 @default.
• W2187582152 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2187582152 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2187582152 magId "2187582152" @default.
• W2187582152 workType "book-chapter" @default.